Impact of nurse-led outpatient management of children with asthma on healthcare resource utilisation and costs.

The high burden of asthma on healthcare utilisation and costs warrants economic appraisal of management approaches. The authors previously demonstrated that the efficacy of nurse-led outpatient management of childhood asthma was comparable to management by a paediatrician and now report on the healthcare utilisation and costs of both management approaches. A total of 74 newly referred children with asthma were randomly assigned to a 1-yr follow-up by paediatricians or asthma nurse. Healthcare utilisation was recorded and associated costs calculated for both management approaches. There were no significant differences in healthcare utilisation except for the total time spent on patient contact (136(n = 14) versus 187(n = 41) min, for patients followed-up by paediatrician and an asthma nurse repectively). Costs within the healthcare sector were reduced by 7.2% in favour of nurse-led care. The reduction in costs was solely attributable to a 17.5% reduction in the costs of outpatient visits. Nurse-led care appeared to be cost-saving even if the duration of follow-up visits would be twice that of doctor's visits. Overall healthcare costs (within and outside the healthcare sector) were 4.1% lower for nurse-led outpatient management compared to traditional medical care. Nurse-led outpatient management of childhood asthma can be provided at a lower cost than medical care by paediatricians.

Outpatient management of childhood asthma by paediatrician or asthma nurse: randomised controlled study with one year follow up.

BACKGROUND: Until now, care provided by asthma nurses has been additional to care provided by paediatricians. A study was undertaken to compare nurse led outpatient management of childhood asthma with follow up by a paediatrician. METHODS: Seventy four children referred because of insufficient control of persistent asthma were randomly allocated to 1 year follow up by a paediatrician or asthma nurse. The main outcome measure was the percentage of symptom-free days. Additional outcome measures were airway hyperresponsiveness, lung function, daily dose of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), number of exacerbations, number of additional visits to the general practitioner, absence from school, functional health status, and disease specific quality of life. RESULTS: There were no significant differences at the end of the 1 year study period between the two treatment groups in percentage of symptom-free days (mean difference 2.5%; 95% CI -8.8 to 13.8), airway hyperresponsiveness (log10 PD20 0.06; -0.19 to 0.32), functional health status (10.1; -0.3 to 19.8), disease specific quality of life of patients (0.08; -0.9 to 0.7), and disease specific quality of life of caregivers (0.09; -0.2 to 0.3), nor in any other outcome parameters. Most outcome parameters improved considerably over the 1 year study period. These improvements were achieved although the daily dose of ICS was reduced by a mean of 26% compared with the dose received by children at referral. All parents were satisfied with the asthma care received. CONCLUSIONS: After initial assessment in a multidisciplinary clinic, childhood asthma can be successfully managed by an asthma nurse in close cooperation with a paediatrician. During close follow up by paediatrician or asthma nurse, asthma control improved despite a reduction in ICS dose.