ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In evaluating follow-up of early breast cancer, patients' views on care are important. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the introduction of nurse practitioners (NPs) in a breast cancer unit on patients' informational needs, preferences and attitude towards follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was performed among two groups in 2005. Group A (n = 89) consisted of patients operated before, and group B (n = 100) after the introduction of a breast cancer unit (respectively in 1998-1999 and 2001-2004). RESULTS: Response was 72% in group A and 84% in group B. Median follow-up was 69 (54-86) and 33 (0-57) months, respectively. Aspects highly appreciated by patients in both groups were lifetime follow-up, information about prognosis, life style and additional investigations. Important discussion subjects were fatigue, pain, genetic factors, prevention and arm function/lymph-oedema. Less valued aspects were information about peers, conversations with psychologists or social workers, breast reconstruction, and acceptation by family members. The informational needs and preferences did not differ statistically significantly between both groups. In group B, communication with the caregiver was valued higher and more patients indicated that the caregiver took the time needed. More patients in group B indicated that follow-up could be performed by the NP. Duration of follow-up correlated with preferred frequency, not with informational needs in follow-up, only young age increased these needs. CONCLUSION: Despite the limitations of this retrospective study, we conclude that while expectations and informational needs did not change with the introduction of a NP to the standard care, patient satisfaction increased and communication and time taken were appreciated more.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/nursing , Continuity of Patient Care , Nurse Practitioners , Patient Preference , Adaptation, Psychological , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Attitude to Health , Breast Neoplasms/psychology , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Patient Education as Topic , Quality of Life , Role , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
AIM: To provide insight into professionals' opinions on breast cancer follow-up to facilitate implementation of new follow-up strategies. The study focuses on current practice, purpose and perceived effects, and preferred frequency and duration of follow-up. DESIGN: A 29-item questionnaire on professionals' demographics, current practice, opinion on the current guideline, preferences in frequency and duration of tailored follow-up, and the purpose and perceived effects of follow-up was sent to 633 Dutch professionals. RESULTS: The current national guideline is followed by 81% of respondents. All different specialists are involved in follow-up. Sixty-nine percent of respondents' report nurse practitioners to be involved in follow-up. When asked for tailored follow-up, professionals indicate more factors for increased follow-up (age<40 years, pT3-4 tumour, pN2-3, treatment related morbidity, and psychosocial support), than for reduced schedules (age >70 years and DCIS histology). Alternative forms of follow-up are not endorsed by >90% of respondents. Detection of a new primary tumour of the breast is considered the most important purpose of follow-up (98%), 57% still indicates detecting metastases as a goal. CONCLUSIONS: Professionals tend towards longer and more intensive follow-up than the current guideline for a large group of patients. Limitations and developments in follow-up need to be considered to facilitate alternative follow-up strategies.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Continuity of Patient Care , Nurse Practitioners/psychology , Physicians/psychology , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Chi-Square Distribution , Female , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Risk Factors , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
AIMS: After treatment, early breast cancer patients undergo follow-up according to standard regimens. After the first year, the main goal is particularly to detect locoregional recurrences (LRR). Our aim was to develop a simple prognostic index to predict LRR to tailor the follow-up programme. METHODS: We used data from four large international clinical randomised trials and constructed the prognostic index using Cox proportional hazards regression. The bootstrap (a resampling method) was used for internal validation. RESULTS: A total of 6516 patients treated according to current guidelines with complete covariable information were used for analysis. Covariables important for LRR in patients treated with breast conserving therapy were age, pathological tumour status, boost and surgical margins. The same variables were important for patients treated with a mastectomy, however, instead of the boost, the pathological nodal status was important. The index is composed to consist of three groups based on LRR risk after 10-years. CONCLUSIONS: We constructed a simple prognostic index that can be used to estimate risks of LRR in patients with early breast cancer. The prognostic index enables patients to be stratified into three subgroups with different outcomes with regard to LRR.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Analysis of Variance , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic , Decision Trees , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Mastectomy, Modified Radical , Mastectomy, Segmental , Middle Aged , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Neoplasm Staging , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk Assessment , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Body composition evaluation by bioelectrical impedance analysis in children makes use of different group-specific population-derived equations. The present study was conducted to attempt to validate the use of population-independent physical model-derived equations in children. METHODS: The validity of bioelectrical impedance analysis for the measurement of total body water in children was evaluated by comparing results of two physical model-derived and two population-derived equations with those of deuterium dilution as reference method in a group of 38 heterogeneous children. RESULTS: Means +/- standard deviation (in liters) for total body water measured with deuterium dilution and the physical model 1-derived equation were 18.4 +/- 4.7 L and 18.1 +/- 4.4 L, respectively. This difference is not significant, whereas significant differences were found for all other tested equations. Significant smaller absolute differences between the model 1 equation and deuterium reference results were found when compared with the results of the other three tested equations. CONCLUSION: When compared with results of the reference deuterium method the physical model 1-derived equation was the only one that provided reliable total body water results by bioelectrical impedance analysis in children.
