The adsorption of dabigatran is as efficient as addition of idarucizumab to neutralize the drug in routine coagulation assays.

INTRODUCTION: The direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran interferes with thrombophilia screening and with the diagnosis of hemostasis disorders that develop during treatment with the anticoagulant. In vitro addition of idarucizumab, a humanized antibody fragment that binds dabigatran, to plasma samples containing dabigatran fully neutralizes the drug. This study was carried out to determine whether binding of dabigatran on selected insoluble commercial adsorbent material, DOAC-STOPR , was as efficient as idarucizumab to neutralize the anticoagulant activity of the drug in vitro. METHODS: Coagulation assays sensitive to dabigatran were carried out with patient and control plasma samples spiked with dabigatran and supplemented with idarucizumab or incubated with adsorbent material. RESULTS: In samples containing upto 10 000 ng/mL dabigatran, the adsorption procedure was at least as efficient as the addition of idarucizumab to neutralize the activity of the anticoagulant drug. Neither the adsorption procedure nor the addition of idarucizumab did impair routine coagulation assays carried out with plasma devoid of dabigatran, such as the activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, fibrinogen Clauss, and the thrombophilia screening assays used to detect antiphospholipid antibodies or activated protein C resistance. In addition, the adsorption procedure did not interfere with the detection of lupus anticoagulant samples. CONCLUSIONS: Adsorption of dabigatran in plasma samples containing the drug neutralizes its activity as efficiently as the addition of idarucizumab. This method allows the evaluation of thrombophilia markers without interruption of anticoagulation therapy or the detection of hemostasis disorders in patients treated with the drug.

Measurement of B-domain-deleted ReFacto AF activity with a product-specific standard is affected by choice of reagent and patient-specific factors.

INTRODUCTION: Postinfusion ReFacto AF levels can be difficult to measure accurately due to discrepancies between one-stage and chromogenic FVIII assays. To overcome this, the use of the ReFacto AF laboratory standard (RAFLS) is recommended, but there are discordant reports regarding its usefulness. AIM: We investigated whether calibration with RAFLS and measurement of ReFacto AF levels are influenced by the choice of reagents and patient-specific factors in one-stage FVIII assays. METHODS: Calibration curves were generated with both the RAFLS and a plasma standard using different F8DPs and one-stage FVIII assay reagents. This selection of reagents was then used to determine FVIII levels in the plasma of patients repeatedly treated with ReFacto AF. Results were compared with those obtained with a chromogenic assay. RESULTS: F8DP devoid of von Willebrand factor (VWF) falsely increased the values of RAFLS pro-coagulant activity generated using the APTT reagent. The resulting RAFLS calibration curve underestimated ReFacto AF levels to be half of their true concentration. The use of RAFLS with F8DP containing VWF reduced the discrepancy observed between the one-stage and chromogenic FVIII assays. However, the mean difference between the two assays still varied up to 50% depending on the patient. CONCLUSIONS: The RAFLS is a suitable calibrator for one-stage FVIII assays carried out with F8DP containing VWF. However, calibration with the RAFLS does not avoid the effect of patient-specific variables that contribute to discrepancies between the measurements of ReFacto AF levels with one-stage and chromogenic FVIII assays.

The amplitude of coagulation curves from thrombin time tests allows dysfibrinogenemia caused by the common mutation FGG-Arg301 to be distinguished from hypofibrinogenemia.

INTRODUCTION: Thrombin time (TT) tests are useful for diagnosing coagulation disorders involving abnormal fibrinogen but do not allow us to distinguish between qualitative and quantitative defects. However, with the widening availability of optical coagulation automates, more information about the coagulation process is becoming increasingly accessible. METHODS: In this study, we compared the coagulation curves of TT tests carried out with plasma from healthy donors with those from patients with acquired low Clauss fibrinogen levels or with dysfibrinogenemia caused by a heterozygous point mutation in the fibrinogen γ-chain that results in a p.Arg301(275)Cys substitution. The functional fibrinogen levels of these three groups of samples were also measured with the Clauss method, and their fibrinogen protein levels were determined by ELISA. RESULTS: Our data indicate that the amplitude and maximal velocity of coagulation curves from plasma samples from FGG p.Arg301(275)Cys dysfibrinogenemic patients were comparable to those from plasma samples with fibrinogen in the normal range, whereas the amplitude of coagulation curves from patients with acquired low fibrinogen levels was lower. CONCLUSIONS: Examination of the amplitude of coagulation curves generated during TT tests may provide additional information to enable the differential diagnoses of diseases following a low fibrinogen measurement by the Clauss method.

The addition of idarucizumab to plasma samples containing dabigatran allows the use of routine coagulation assays for the diagnosis of hemostasis disorders.

BACKGROUND: The anticoagulant effect of dabigatran can be approximated by its prolongation of routine coagulation assays. Consequently, dabigatran also interferes with thrombophilia screening or with diagnosing hemostasis disorders that have developed after the initiation of anticoagulant treatment, such as vitamin K deficiency or acquired hemophilia A. OBJECTIVES: This study was carried out to determine whether idarucizumab, a humanized antibody fragment that binds dabigatran, could fully neutralize dabigatran in routine diagnostic coagulation assays conducted in vitro, thereby preventing false-positive or false-negative diagnostic readouts. METHODS: Preliminary experiments identified coagulation assays that were sensitive to dabigatran, and identified a concentration of idarucizumab that neutralized the effects of dabigatran. These assays were then carried out with patient and control plasma samples spiked with dabigatran, with or without a molar excess of idarucizumab. RESULTS: Dabigatran altered the prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time and thrombin time, and the measurement of intrinsic and extrinsic factor levels. Screening and confirmation tests used for lupus anticoagulant detection were prolonged by dabigatran, falsely suggesting the presence of lupus anticoagulant. Conversely, the addition of dabigatran falsely corrected an abnormal activated protein C resistance ratio. Addition of idarucizumab completely normalized these measurements, and allowed the correct identification of normal and abnormal samples with these assays. CONCLUSIONS: In vitro addition of idarucizumab to plasma samples containing dabigatran fully neutralizes the drug, and facilitates the use of routine coagulation assays to allow the diagnosis of hemostasis disorders that may be concurrently present in patients taking dabigatran.