Objective perimetry identifies regional functional progression and recovery in mild Diabetic Macular Oedema.

PURPOSE: Retinal function beyond foveal vision is not routinely examined in the clinical screening and management of diabetic retinopathy although growing evidence suggests it may precede structural changes. In this study we compare optical coherence tomography (OCT) based macular structure with function measured objectively with the ObjectiveFIELD Analyzer (OFA), and with Matrix perimetry. We did that longitudinally in Type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients with mild Diabetic Macular Oedema (DMO) with good vision and a similar number of T2D patients without DMO, to evaluate changes in retinal function more peripherally over the natural course of retinopathy. METHODS: Both eyes of 16 T2D patients (65.0 ± 10.1, 10 females), 10 with baseline DMO, were followed for up longitudinally for 27 months providing 94 data sets. Vasculopathy was assessed by fundus photography. Retinopathy was graded using to Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) guidelines. Posterior-pole OCT quantified a 64-region/eye thickness grid. Retinal function was measured with 10-2 Matrix perimetry, and the FDA-cleared OFA. Two multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry (mfPOP) variants presented 44 stimuli/eye within either the central 30° or 60° of the visual field, providing sensitivities and delays for each test-region. OCT, Matrix and 30° OFA data were mapped to a common 44 region/eye grid allowing change over time to be compared at the same retinal regions. RESULTS: In eyes that presented with DMO at baseline, mean retinal thickness reduced from 237 ± 25 µm to 234.2 ± 26.7 µm, while the initially non-DMO eyes significantly increased their mean thickness from 250.7 ± 24.4 µm to 255.7 ± 20.6 µm (both p<0.05). Eyes that reduced in retinal thickness over time recovered to more normal OFA sensitivities and delays (all p<0.021). Matrix perimetry quantified fewer regions that changed significantly over the 27 months, mostly presenting in the central 8 degrees. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in retinal function measured by OFA possibly offer greater power to monitor DMO over time than Matrix perimetry data.

Rapid Objective Testing of Visual Function Matched to the ETDRS Grid and Its Diagnostic Power in Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Purpose: To study the power of an 80-second multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry (mfPOP) test tailored to the ETDRS grid to diagnose age-related macular degeneration (AMD) by Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) severity grade. Design: Evaluation of a diagnostic technology. Methods: We compared diagnostic power of acuity, ETDRS grid retinal thickness data, new 80-second M18 mfPOP test, and two wider-field 6-minute mfPOP tests (Macular-P131, Widefield-P129). The M18 stimuli match the size and shape of bifurcated ETDRS grid regions, allowing easy structure-function comparisons. M18, P129, and P131 stimuli test both eyes concurrently. We recruited 34 patients with early-stage AMD with a mean ± standard deviation (SD) age of 72.6 ± 7.06 years. The M18 and P129 plus P131 stimuli had 26 and 51 control participants, respectively with mean ± SD ages of 73.1 ± 8.17 years and 72.1 ± 5.83 years, respectively. Multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry testing used the Food and Drug Administration-cleared Objective FIELD Analyzer (OFA; Konan Medical USA). Main Outcome Measures: Percentage area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) and Hedge's g effect size. Results: Acuity and OCT ETDRS grid thickness and volume produced reasonable diagnostic power (percentage AUC) for AREDS grade 4 eyes at 83.9 ± 9.98% and 90.2 ± 6.32% (mean ± standard error), respectively, but not for eyes with less severe disease. By contrast, M18 stimuli produced percentage AUCs from 72.8 ± 6.65% (AREDS grade 2) to 92.9 ± 3.93% (AREDS grade 4), and 82.9 ± 3.71% for all eyes. Hedge's g effect sizes ranged from 0.84 to 2.32 (large to huge). Percentage AUC for P131 stimuli performed similarly and for P129 performed somewhat less well. Conclusions: The rapid and objective M18 test provided diagnostic power comparable with that of wider-field 6-minute mfPOP tests. Unlike acuity or OCT ETDRS grid data, OFA tests produced reasonable diagnostic power in AREDS grade 1 to 3 eyes.

Objective perimetry and progression of multiple sclerosis.

Introduction: We re-examined the per-region response amplitudes and delays obtained from multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry (mfPOP) after 10 years in 44 persons living with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), both to examine which parts of the visual field had progressed in terms of response properties and to examine if the baseline data could predict the overall progression of disease. Methods: Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores were assessed in 2009 and 2019. Both eyes of each participant were concurrently tested at 44 locations/eye on both occasions. Several measures of clinical progression were examined, using logistic regression to determine the odds of progression. Results: At the second examination the 44 PwMS (31 females) were aged 61.0 ± 12.2 y. Mean EDSS had not changed significantly (3.69 ± 1.23 in 2009, 3.81 ± 2.00 in 2019). mfPOP delay increased progressively from inferior to superior regions of the visual fields while amplitudes demonstrated a temporal to nasal gradient. The mean of the 3 most delayed visual field regions was correlated with progression of MS by 2019 (p = 0.023). Logistic regression indicated a significant association between delay and odds of progression (p = 0.045): an individual with 3 regions at least 1 SD (40 ms) slower than the mean in 2009 had 2.05× (±SE: 1.43× to 2.95×) the odds of progression by 2019. A 1 SD shorter delay was associated with 2.05× lower odds of progression. Amplitude changes were not predictive of progression. Significance: mfPOP may provide a rapid, convenient method of monitoring and predicting MS progression.

Comparing Objective Perimetry, Matrix Perimetry, and Regional Retinal Thickness in Mild Diabetic Macular Edema.

Purpose: To compare per-region macular sensitivity and delay from objective perimetry with Matrix perimetry and retinal thickness in mild diabetic macular edema (DMO). Methods: Thirty-three patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) aged 59.2 ± 10.5 years participated in a longitudinal study. Macular thickness, sensitivities and delays from the objectiveFIELD Analyzer (OFA), and Matrix perimeter sensitivities were mapped onto a common spatial layout to compute per-region correlations between structure/function measures. A generalized linear mixed-effects logistic regression model determined which variables contributed to clinical diagnosis of DMO. Results: For OFA, the mean sensitivity differences compared with normal in patients with T2D were negative and the mean delay differences positive, indicating lowered sensitivities and prolonged delays, both increasing with diabetes duration. Shorter diabetes duration could produce either localized peripheral hypersensitivities or shorter delays. Functional change could occur when retinal thickness was stable. Peripheral macular thickness correlated with central and peripheral OFA sensitivity and delay, all P < 0.0012 in DMO and a median of P = 0.001 without DMO; this was not true for Matrix sensitivities. The logistic model determined that peripheral thickness, OFA sensitivity (P = 0.043), and time in the study (P = 0.001) contribute independently to the odds of DMO versus no DMO. Conclusions: Mean sensitivities decreased and mean delays increased with duration of diabetes. Peripheral macular thickness correlated significantly with central and peripheral macular OFA sensitivity and delay. Peripheral macular thickness and functional measures may provide sensitive prognostic data. Translational Relevance: Functional loss can precede structural change in DMO, so including such functional assessment for deciding on treatment may be beneficial.