Do hip and groin muscle strength and symptoms change throughout a football season in professional male football players? A prospective cohort study with repeated measures.

OBJECTIVES: Groin injuries are common in professional male football and result in significant complaints, time-loss and cost. We aimed to study: 1. Normal values of hip muscle strength and self-reported hip and groin function (Hip And Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS)). 2. Changes in these values throughout the season. 3. If previous (groin) injuries, leg dominance or league were associated with these outcome measures. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: 313 professional male football players (11 clubs) participated. Player characteristics and previous injuries were registered. Hip muscle strength (hand-held dynamometer) and HAGOS measurements were done at the start, middle and end of the season. RESULTS: Data from 217 players were analysed. Adduction strength (mean±standard deviation, Nm/Kg) was 3.40±0.72 (start), 3.30±0.65 (mid) and 3.39±0.74 (end) (p=0.186). Abduction strength was 3.45±0.67, 3.14±0.57 and 3.28±0.61 (p<0.001). Adduction/abduction ratio was 1.00±0.21, 1.07±0.22 and 1.05±0.23 (p<0.001). Statistically, the HAGOS-subscale 'Pain' (median [interquartile range]) deteriorated slightly during the season (p=0.005), especially from mid-season (97.5 [90.6-100.0]) to end-of-season (95.0 [87.5-100.0]) (p=0.003). Other subscale scores remained unchanged between time points; 85.7 (symptoms), 100.0 (daily living), 96.9 (sports and recreation) 100.0, (physical activities) and 90.0 (quality of life). Previous injuries were associated with lower HAGOS-scores. Dominant legs had higher abduction strength (p<0.001) and lower adduction/abduction ratio (p<0.001). No differences between leagues were found for hip muscle strength and HAGOS-scores. CONCLUSIONS: In Dutch male professional football players, hip muscle strength and HAGOS-scores remained relatively stable throughout the season. Pain increased slightly, which while statistically significant, was not clinically relevant.

Clinical and radiological hip parameters do not precede, but develop simultaneously with cam morphology: a 5-year follow-up study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to (1) investigate whether radiographic and clinical parameters, which influence how stresses during sporting activities act on the proximal femur, are associated with cam morphology or (2) precede cam morphology development. METHODS: Young male football players participated at baseline (n = 89, 12-19 years of age), 2.5-year (n = 63) and 5-year follow-up (n = 49). Standardized anteroposterior pelvic and frog-leg lateral radiographs were obtained at each time-point. Cam morphology was quantified by an alpha angle ≥ 60°, and large cam morphology ≥ 78°. The neck-shaft angle (NSA), epiphyseal extension (EE), lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) and hip internal rotation (IR) were also measured. Cross-sectional associations between NSA, EE, LCEA and IR and (large) cam morphology were studied at all time-points. To study whether these variables preceded cam morphology development, hips without cam morphology at baseline were studied prospectively. RESULTS: A lower NSA, a higher EE and limited IR were consistently associated with cam morphology at all three time-points. These differences were more pronounced in hips with large cam morphology. No association between cam morphology and the LCEA was found. None of the parameters studied preceded cam morphology development. CONCLUSION: Cam morphology developed simultaneously with a varus orientation, growth plate extension towards the femoral neck and limited hip internal rotation. These parameters did not precede cam morphology development. The hip parameters studied cannot be used to identify individuals at risk of developing cam morphology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.