Diagnosis of union of distal tibia fractures: accuracy and interobserver reliability.

Decisions about return to activity and additional surgery are often made on the basis of radiographs obtained 3 months after injury. If radiographs 3 months after injury cannot reliably and accurately diagnose union, then patients may be needlessly disabled and might receive unnecessary treatments including surgery. We evaluated the accuracy and the reliability of the diagnosis of union or eventual union on radiographs obtained 3 months after open reduction and internal fixation of a fracture of the distal tibia by having 69 trauma surgeons evaluate radiographs of 33 consecutively treated patients in an online survey. Observers were also asked to judge specific criteria that are commonly used to diagnose fracture union. There was moderate interobserver reliability for the diagnosis of union or diagnosis of "eventual union". The interobserver agreement for the various specific radiographic signs of union varied between fair to moderate. The sensitivity of radiographs for diagnosis of "union or eventual union" of distal tibia fractures was 47%, the specificity was 73% and the accuracy was 68%. The prevalence adjusted positive predictive value was 25% and the negative predictive value was 88%. Diagnosis of union based on radiographs 3 months after injury is only moderately reliable and accurate but has a high negative predictive value. Decisions about activity level and additional treatment 3 months after injury should not be based on radiographs alone.

Magnetic resonance imaging signal abnormalities in enthesopathy of the extensor carpi radialis longus origin.

PURPOSE: Some surgeons use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in patients with enthesopathy of the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) origin (commonly referred to as lateral epicondylitis) to plan and justify surgical treatment. Overinterpretation of defects of the origin of the ECRB or associated abnormalities of the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) could affect decision-making. We tested the hypothesis that patients with MRI signal abnormalities consistent with enthesopathy of the ECRB are equally likely to have findings consistent with an ECRB defect or LCL abnormality whether they are being evaluated as part of preoperative planning for lateral elbow pain or for an elbow condition that does not feature lateral elbow pain. METHODS: For each of 24 consecutive patients with enthesopathy of the ECRB who had MRI for preoperative evaluation, we selected 2 age- and gender-matched controls from a list of patients who had an elbow MRI to evaluate other elbow problems. The origin of the ECRB and the LCL were specifically evaluated. RESULTS: Patients diagnosed with enthesopathy of the ECRB were significantly more likely than control patients to have signal changes consistent with enthesopathy of the ECRB origin (24 of 24 vs 9 of 48; p < .001). The proportion of patients with a partial thickness defect of the ECRB origin (14 of 24 vs 4 of 9) was comparable between patients diagnosed with enthesopathy of the ECRB origin and controls. Signal changes in the LCL were comparable in patients diagnosed with enthesopathy of the ECRB origin and control patients (8 of 24 vs 2 of 9; p = .27), and no patient had clinical evidence of instability. CONCLUSIONS: Use of MRI in the management of patients with enthesopathy of the ECRB origin merits further study.

Chordoma of a thoracic vertebra. A case report.

A 51-year-old woman presented with aspecific clinical symptoms of the thoracic spine. Radiological survey showed a tumour mass at T3-T4. Initial microscopic evaluation was suggestive of renal cell carcinoma metastasis. Lack of a primary tumour and revision of the specimens changed the diagnosis into chordoma.