Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 32
Filter
1.
Virchows Arch ; 475(1): 25-37, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30719547

ABSTRACT

Biomarker analysis for colorectal cancer has been shown to be reliable in Europe with 97% of samples tested by EQA participants to be correctly classified. This study focuses on errors during the annual EQA assessment. The aim was to explore the causes and actions related to the observed errors and to provide feedback and assess any improvement between 2016 and 2017. An electronic survey was sent to all laboratories with minimum one genotyping error or technical failure on ten tumor samples. A workshop was organized based on 2016 survey responses. Improvement of performance in 2017 was assessed for returning participants (n = 76), survey respondents (n = 13) and workshop participants (n = 4). Survey respondents and workshop participants improved in terms of (maximum) analysis score, successful participation, and genotyping errors compared to all returning participants. In 2016, mostly pre- and post-analytical errors (both 25%) were observed caused by unsuitability of the tumor tissue for molecular analysis. In 2017, most errors were due to analytical problems (50.0%) caused by methodological problems. The most common actions taken (n = 58) were protocol revisions (34.5%) and staff training (15.5%). In 24.1% of issues identified no action was performed. Corrective actions were linked to an improved performance, especially if performed by the pathologist. Although biomarker testing has improved over time, error occurrence at different phases stresses the need for quality improvement throughout the test process. Participation to quality improvement projects and a close collaboration with the pathologist can have a positive influence on performance.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Diagnostic Errors , Laboratory Proficiency Testing/standards , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/standards , Quality Improvement/standards , Quality Indicators, Health Care/standards , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Congresses as Topic , Europe , Follow-Up Studies , Formative Feedback , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Observer Variation , Phenotype , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results , Workflow
2.
Br J Cancer ; 119(5): 605-614, 2018 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30140047

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Predictive biomarkers allow clinicians to optimise cancer treatment decisions. Therefore, molecular biomarker test results need to be accurate and swiftly available. To ensure quality of oncology biomarker testing, external quality assessments (EQA) for somatic variant analyses were organised. This study hypothesised whether laboratory characteristics influence the performance of laboratories and whether these can be imposed before authorisation of biomarker testing. METHODS: Longitudinal EQA data from the European Society of Pathology were available over six (metastatic colorectal cancer) and four years (non-small cell lung cancer), including the percentage of analysis errors and technical failures, and information on laboratory characteristics (accreditation status, laboratory setting, number of samples analysed and detection method). Statistical models for repeated measurements were used to analyse the association between the EQA results and the laboratory characteristics. RESULTS: Laboratory accreditation was associated with fewer analysis errors in early stages of biomarker introduction into the laboratory. Analysing more samples, or university and research laboratories showed better performance. Changing the detection method did not have an effect. CONCLUSION: The indicators support the clinicians in choosing molecular pathology laboratories by improving quality assurance and guaranteeing patient safety. Accreditation of laboratories, centralisation of biomarker testing or a university and research setting should be stimulated.


Subject(s)
Accreditation/methods , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Laboratories/standards , Genetic Variation , Humans , Medical Oncology , Neoplasm Metastasis , Quality Control , Research Design
3.
Eur J Cancer Prev ; 27(4): 384-390, 2018 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25969132

ABSTRACT

The conventional definition for rare disease is based on prevalence. Because of differences in prognosis, a definition on the basis of incidence was deemed to be more appropriate for rare cancers. Within the European RARECARE project, a definition was introduced that defines cancers as rare when the crude incidence rate is less than six per 100 000 per year. In this study, we applied the RARECARE definition for rare cancer to the Netherlands; this to identify the usefulness of the definition in a single country and to provide more insight into the burden of rare cancers in the Netherlands. Data for 2004 through 2008 were extracted from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and classified according to the RARECARE entities (tumour groupings). Crude and European standardized incidence rates were calculated. Out of the 260 entities, 223 (86%) were rare according to the definition, accounting for 14 000 cancers (17% of all). Considerable fluctuations in crude rates over years were observed for the major group of cancers. Rare tumours in the Netherlands constituted 17% of all newly diagnosed tumours, but were divided over 223 different entities, indicating the challenge that faces clinicians. To make the definition of rare cancers better applicable, it should be refined by taking into consideration the sex-specific incidence for sex-specific cancer sites. Moreover, a mean incidence over 5 years will provide more solid insight into the burden, eliminating large fluctuations in time of most of the cancers.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/epidemiology , Rare Diseases/epidemiology , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Netherlands/epidemiology , Prognosis
4.
World J Gastrointest Oncol ; 9(6): 251-256, 2017 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28656075

ABSTRACT

AIM: To evaluate a step up approach: Taking macrobiopsies and performing excision biopsies in patients with suspected rectal cancer in which biopsies taken though the flexible endoscope showed benign histology. METHODS: Patients with a rectal neoplasm who underwent flexible endoscopy and biopsies were included. In case of benign biopsies rigid rectoscopy and macrobiopsies were employed. If this failed to prove malignancy, transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) was used in a final effort to establish a certain preoperative diagnosis. The preoperative results were compared with the findings after surgical excision and follow up to calculate the reliability of this algorithm. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-two patients were included. One hundred and ten patients with a carcinoma and 22 with an adenoma. Seventy-five of 110 carcinomas were proven malignant after flexible endoscopy. With the addition of rigid endoscopy and taking of macrobiopsies, this number increased to 89. Performing TEM excision biopsies further enlarged the number of proven malignancies to 100. CONCLUSION: The step-up approach includes taking macrobiopsies through the rigid rectoscope and performing excision biopsies using transanal endoscopic microsurgery in addition to flexible endoscopy. This approach, reduced the number of missed preoperative malignant diagnoses from 32% to 9%.

5.
Virchows Arch ; 471(2): 199-207, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28343306

ABSTRACT

The raid evolution in molecular pathology resulting in an increasing complexity requires careful reporting. The need for standardisation is clearer than ever. While synoptic reporting was first used for reporting hereditary genetic diseases, it is becoming more frequent in pathology, especially molecular pathology reports too. The narrative approach is no longer feasible with the growing amount of essential data present on the report, although narrative components are still necessary for interpretation in molecular pathology. On the way towards standardisation of reports, guidelines can be a helpful tool. There are several guidelines that focus on reporting in the field of hereditary diseases, but it is not always feasible to extrapolate these to the reporting of somatic variants in molecular pathology. The rise of multi-gene testing causes challenges for the laboratories. In order to provide a continuous optimisation of the laboratory testing process, including reporting, external quality assessment is essential and has already proven to improve the quality of reports. In general, a clear and concise report for molecular pathology can be created by including elements deemed important by different guidelines, adapting the report to the process flows of the laboratory and integrating the report with the laboratory information management system and the patient record.


Subject(s)
Pathology, Molecular/standards , Research Design/standards , Humans
6.
Virchows Arch ; 470(1): 5-20, 2017 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27678269

ABSTRACT

The clinical demand for mutation detection within multiple genes from a single tumour sample requires molecular diagnostic laboratories to develop rapid, high-throughput, highly sensitive, accurate and parallel testing within tight budget constraints. To meet this demand, many laboratories employ next-generation sequencing (NGS) based on small amplicons. Building on existing publications and general guidance for the clinical use of NGS and learnings from germline testing, the following guidelines establish consensus standards for somatic diagnostic testing, specifically for identifying and reporting mutations in solid tumours. These guidelines cover the testing strategy, implementation of testing within clinical service, sample requirements, data analysis and reporting of results. In conjunction with appropriate staff training and international standards for laboratory testing, these consensus standards for the use of NGS in molecular pathology of solid tumours will assist laboratories in implementing NGS in clinical services.


Subject(s)
Genetic Predisposition to Disease , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Mutation/genetics , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/genetics , Pathology, Molecular , Expert Testimony/methods , Humans , Pathology, Molecular/methods
9.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 908: 371-91, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27573781

ABSTRACT

Familial clustering is seen in 10 % of gastric cancer cases and approximately 1-3 % of gastric cancer arises in the setting of hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC). In families with HDGC, gastric cancer presents at young age. HDGC is predominantly caused by germline mutations in CDH1 and in a minority by mutations in other genes, including CTNNA1. Early stage HDGC is characterized by a few, up to dozens of intramucosal foci of signet ring cell carcinoma and its precursor lesions. These include in situ signet ring cell carcinoma and pagetoid spread of signet ring cells. Advanced HDGC presents as poorly cohesive/diffuse type carcinoma, normally with very few typical signet ring cells, and has a poor prognosis. Currently, it is unknown which factors drive the progression towards aggressive disease, but it is clear that most intramucosal lesions will not have such progression.Immunohistochemical profile of early and advanced HDGC is often characterized by abnormal E-cadherin immunoexpression, including absent or reduced membranous expression, as well as "dotted" or cytoplasmic expression. However, membranous expression of E-cadherin does not exclude HDGC. Intramucosal HDGC (pT1a) presents with an "indolent" phenotype, characterized by typical signet ring cells without immunoexpression of Ki-67 and p53, while advanced carcinomas (pT > 1) display an "aggressive" phenotype with pleomorphic cells, that are immunoreactive for Ki-67 and p53. These features show that the IHC profile is different between intramucosal and more advanced HDGC, providing evidence of phenotypic heterogeneity, and may help to define predictive biomarkers of progression from indolent to aggressive, widely invasive carcinomas.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/methods , Gene Expression Profiling/methods , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Stomach Neoplasms/genetics , Animals , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Biomedical Research/trends , Forecasting , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/genetics , Humans , Mutation , Stomach Neoplasms/metabolism , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology
10.
J Mol Diagn ; 18(2): 205-14, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26752307

ABSTRACT

Personalized medicine has gained increasing importance in clinical oncology, and several clinically important biomarkers are implemented in routine practice. In an effort to guarantee high quality of molecular testing in France, three subsequent external quality assessment rounds were organized at the initiative of the National Cancer Institute between 2012 and 2014. The schemes included clinically relevant biomarkers for metastatic colorectal (KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, microsatellite instability) and non-small cell lung cancer (EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, ERBB2), and they represent the first multigene/multicancer studies throughout Europe. In total, 56 laboratories coordinated by 28 regional molecular centers participated in the schemes. Laboratories received formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples and were asked to use routine methods for molecular testing to predict patient response to targeted therapies. They were encouraged to return results within 14 calendar days after sample receipt. Both genotyping and reporting were evaluated separately. During the three external quality assessment rounds, mean genotype scores were all above the preset standard of 90% for all biomarkers. Participants were mainly challenged in case of rare insertions or deletions. Assessment of the written reports showed substantial progress between the external quality assessment schemes on multiple criteria. Several essential elements such as the clinical interpretation of test results and the reason for testing still require improvement by continued external quality assessment education.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Laboratory Proficiency Testing/standards , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , France , Genetic Testing/standards , Genotyping Techniques/standards , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Microsatellite Instability , Time Factors
11.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 57(7): 1649-56, 2016 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26694256

ABSTRACT

Nodal marginal zone lymphoma (NMZL) is a rare type of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. This study assessed the clinical features of 56 patients with NMZL in comparison to 46 patients with follicular lymphoma (FL). Patients with NMZL and FL had a largely similar clinical presentation, but patients with FL had a higher disease stage at presentation, more frequent abdominal lymphadenopathy and bone marrow involvement, and showed more common transformation into diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) during the course of disease. Overall survival and event-free survival were similar for patients with NMZL and FL, but factors associated with worse prognosis differed between the two groups. Transformation into DLBCL was associated with a significantly poorer outcome in both groups, but the phenotypes were different: DLBCL arising in FL was mainly of germinal center B-cell phenotype, whereas DLBCL arising in NMZL was mainly of non-germinal center B-cell phenotype.


Subject(s)
Lymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal Zone/diagnosis , Lymphoma, B-Cell, Marginal Zone/mortality , Lymphoma, Follicular/diagnosis , Lymphoma, Follicular/mortality , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasm Staging , Phenotype , Prognosis , Survival Analysis , Symptom Assessment , Young Adult
12.
Oncotarget ; 6(33): 34680-90, 2015 Oct 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26415226

ABSTRACT

Over 95% of all synovial sarcomas (SS) share a unique translocation, t(X;18), however, they show heterogeneous clinical behavior. We analyzed multiple SS to reveal additional genetic alterations besides the translocation. Twenty-six SS from 22 patients were sequenced for 409 cancer-related genes using the Comprehensive Cancer Panel (Life Technologies, USA) on an Ion Torrent platform. The detected variants were verified by Sanger sequencing and compared to matched normal DNAs. Copy number variation was assessed in six tumors using the Oncoscan array (Affymetrix, USA). In total, eight somatic mutations were detected in eight samples. These mutations have not been reported previously in SS. Two of these, in KRAS and CCND1, represent known oncogenic mutations in other malignancies. Additional mutations were detected in RNF213, SEPT9, KDR, CSMD3, MLH1 and ERBB4. DNA alterations occurred more often in adult tumors. A distinctive loss of 6q was found in a metastatic lesion progressing under pazopanib, but not in the responding lesion. Our results emphasize t(X;18) as a single initiating event in SS and as the main oncogenic driver. Our results also show the occurrence of additional genetic events, mutations or chromosomal aberrations, occurring more frequently in SS with an onset in adults.


Subject(s)
DNA Mutational Analysis , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Sarcoma, Synovial/genetics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , DNA Copy Number Variations , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Male , Middle Aged , Mutation , Young Adult
14.
Mol Oncol ; 8(4): 830-9, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24704265

ABSTRACT

Tumor evaluation in pathology is more and more based on a combination of traditional histopathology and molecular analysis. Due to the rapid development of new cancer treatments that specifically target aberrant proteins present in tumor cells, treatment decisions are increasingly based on the molecular features of the tumor. Not only the number of patients eligible for targeted precision medicine, but also the number of molecular targets per patient and tumor type is rising. Diagnostic molecular pathology, the discipline that determines the molecular aberrations present in tumors for diagnostic, prognostic or predictive purposes, is faced with true challenges. The laboratories have to meet the need of comprehensive molecular testing using only limited amount of tumor tissue, mostly fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin (FFPE), in short turnaround time. Choices must be made for analytical methods that provide accurate, reliable and cost-effective results. Validation of the test procedures and results is essential. In addition, participation and good performance in internal (IQA) and external quality assurance (EQA) schemes is mandatory. In this review, we critically evaluate the validation procedure for comprehensive molecular tests as well as the organization of quality assurance and assessment of competence of diagnostic molecular pathology laboratories within Europe.


Subject(s)
High-Throughput Screening Assays , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Pathology, Molecular/methods , Europe , High-Throughput Screening Assays/standards , Humans , Laboratories/standards , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/standards , Neoplasms/pathology , Pathology, Molecular/standards , Pathology, Molecular/trends , Quality Control , Reproducibility of Results
15.
Neoplasia ; 16(3): 221-8, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24726142

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is characterized by high constitutive vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) production that induces a specific vascular phenotype. We previously reported that this phenotype may allow shedding of multicellular tumor fragments into the circulation, possibly contributing to the development of metastasis. Disruption of this phenotype through inhibition of VEGF signaling may therefore result in reduced shedding of tumor fragments and improved prognosis. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the effect of neoadjuvant sorafenib treatment on tumor cluster shedding. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with renal cancer (n = 10, of which 8 have ccRCC) received sorafenib for 4 weeks before tumor nephrectomy. The resection specimens were perfused, and the perfundate was examined for the presence of tumor clusters. Effects of the treatment on the tumor morphology and overall survival were investigated (follow-up of 2 years) and compared with a carefully matched control group. RESULTS: Neoadjuvant sorafenib treatment induced extensive ischemic tumor necrosis and, as expected, destroyed the characteristic ccRCC vascular phenotype. In contrast to the expectation, vital groups of tumor cells with high proliferation indices were detected in postsurgical renal venous outflow in 75% of the cases. Overall survival of patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment was reduced compared to a control group, matched with regard to prognostic parameters. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that neoadjuvant sorafenib therapy for ccRCC does not prevent shedding of tumor fragments. Although this is a nonrandomized study with a small patient group, our results suggest that neoadjuvant treatment may worsen survival through as yet undefined mechanisms.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Niacinamide/analogs & derivatives , Phenylurea Compounds/therapeutic use , Aged , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/surgery , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Kidney/blood supply , Kidney/drug effects , Kidney Neoplasms/mortality , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Kidney Neoplasms/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Nephrectomy , Niacinamide/therapeutic use , Sorafenib , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/metabolism
16.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 156(42): A4982, 2012.
Article in Dutch | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23075775

ABSTRACT

Lynch syndrome is the most common cause of hereditary intestinal cancer, with a 30-70% risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Prevention of CRC by colonoscopy in family members with Lynch syndrome is highly effective; therefore, it is important to trace as many people with this syndrome as possible. Criteria have been developed in the Netherlands to increase detection of hereditary colorectal cancer in a practically feasible and cost-effective way. Based on these criteria, the pathologist can perform microsatellite instability testing in patients recently diagnosed with CRC. The criteria are: CRC under the age of 50, second CRC under the age of 70, or CRC under the age of 70 with a concurrent or previous malignancy associated with Lynch syndrome. For family members and patients diagnosed with CRC more than a year ago, a digital test can be used to determine whether genetic counselling by a geneticist is indicated (www.umcn.nl/verwijzers).


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/genetics , Genetic Testing/methods , Microsatellite Instability , Age Factors , Aged , Colonoscopy , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/prevention & control , Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis/prevention & control , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Humans , Middle Aged , Risk Assessment
17.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 156(31): A4816, 2012.
Article in Dutch | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22853770

ABSTRACT

According to a recent publication, an increase in the number of lymph nodes evaluated by pathologists in colon cancer specimens has not resulted in better staging. Over the years, more lymph nodes have been evaluated; however, not more patients were classified as being node-negative. For this reason, the authors argue that the number of lymph nodes evaluated is not a good quality indicator. We disagree. In our opinion, better staging would lead to better survival in node-negative patients, which was indeed described by Parsons et al. The relatively low disease-staging score in patients with colon cancer in more recent years could be explained by an increase in screening programmes. Dutch data support this explanation.


Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Neoplasm Staging
18.
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol ; 33(2): 113-5, 2011 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21228721

ABSTRACT

In this case report, we describe a 5-month-old girl with a rapid-growing mass of the lower lip extending to the buccal cheek. After surgical interference, the diagnosis lipoblastoma was made. Dealing with a fast-growing tumor in an infant, lipoblastic tumors belong in the differential diagnosis, however, a malignant process cannot be excluded. Rapid-growing lipoblastoma of infancy is a very rare benign tumor of embryonic white fatty cells. Magnetic resonance imaging might help with the diagnosis and often shows a lesion composed mostly, but not entirely, of fat. In this case report, we want to draw attention to the problems with diagnosis and therapeutic management of children with lipoblastoma.


Subject(s)
Cheek/pathology , Lipoma/pathology , Cheek/surgery , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 8/genetics , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Infant , Lipoma/genetics , Lipoma/surgery , Magnetic Resonance Imaging
19.
Haematologica ; 95(2): 247-52, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19773267

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Malignant lymphomas are classified based on morphology, immunophenotype, genetics and clinical features. The pathological diagnosis is generally considered difficult and prone to mistakes. Since non-random chromosomal translocations are specifically involved in specific entities, their detection is an important adjunct for increasing the reliability of the diagnosis. Recently, split-signal fluorescence in situ hybridization has become available as a robust method to detect chromosomal breaks in paraffin-embedded formalin-fixed tissues. A bright field approach would bring this technology within the reach of every pathology laboratory. DESIGN AND METHODS: Our study was initiated to determine the consistency between chromogenic in situ hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization, both using split-signal probes developed for the detection of chromosomal breaks. Five hundred and forty cases of 11 lymphoma entities and reactive, benign lymphoid tissues, collected from eight different pathology laboratories, placed on 15 fluorescence in situ hybridization pre-stained tissue microarray slides, were double stained for the chromogenic hybridization. For each core morphology and actual signal were compared to the original fluorescence hybridization results. In addition, hematoxylin background staining intensity and signal intensity of the double-staining chromogenic in situ hybridization procedure were analyzed. RESULTS: With respect to the presence or absence of chromosomal breaks, 97% concordance was found between the results of the two techniques. Hematoxylin background staining intensity and signal intensity were found to correspond. The overall morphology after double-staining chromogenic in situ hybridization had decreased compared to the initial morphology scored after split-signal fluorescence in situ hybridization staining. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that double-staining chromogenic in situ hybridization is equally reliable as fluorescence in situ hybridization in detecting chromosomal breaks in lymphoid tissue. Although differences in morphology, hematoxylin staining and chromogenic signal intensity vary between the tumor entities none of the entities appeared more easy or difficult to score.


Subject(s)
Chromosome Breakage , In Situ Hybridization/methods , Lymphoma/diagnosis , Chromogenic Compounds , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Lymphoma/genetics , Lymphoma/pathology , Tissue Array Analysis
20.
Virchows Arch ; 454(4): 421-9, 2009 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19280223

ABSTRACT

Web-based virtual microscopy has enabled new applications within pathology. Here, we introduce and evaluate a network of academic servers, designed to maximize image accessibility to users from all regions of Europe. Whole-slide imaging was utilized to digitize the entire slide set (n = 154) for the slide seminars of the 21st European Congress of Pathology. The virtual slides were mirrored to five academic servers across Europe using a novel propagation method. Functionality was implemented that automatically selects the fastest server connection in order to optimize the slide-viewing speed ( http://www.webmicroscope.net/ECP2007). Results show that during 6 months of monitoring the uptime of the network was 100%. The average viewing speed with the network was 3.1 Mbit/s, as compared to 1.9 Mbit/s using single servers. A good viewing speed (>2Mbit/s) was observed in 32 of 37 countries (86%), compared to 25 of 37 (68%) using single servers. Our study shows that implementing a virtual microscopy network spanning a large geographical area is technically feasible. By utilizing existing academic networks and cost-minimizing image compression, it is also economically feasible.


Subject(s)
Computer Communication Networks , Libraries, Digital , Microscopy/methods , Pathology, Clinical , User-Computer Interface , Computer Communication Networks/instrumentation , Europe , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Internet , Pathology, Clinical/instrumentation , Pathology, Clinical/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...