ABSTRACT
When dealing with choices concerning life-threatening or major surgery shared decision making, continuous tuning in with colleagues and monitoring direction is a necessity. The gastroenterologist detected a pancreatic tumour in a 53-year-old man. The patient was told that this tumour was almost surely malignant and that he would die within a year. A pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy was advised and performed. However, the final outcome was an IgG4-mediated autoimmune pancreatitis. The patient felt betrayed by the doctors. Crucial episodes of communication were analysed and we concluded the following. First, in decision-making on life and death, most doctors unconsciously assume a paternalistic attitude, which is not always preferred by the patient. Second, excessive emotional distress of the patient impedes counselling. Third, even in a case of perceived medical urgency, most patients should be allowed some time for reflection. Finally, multidisciplinary consultation may lead to an indistinct ownership of responsibilities by the doctors.
