Cardiovascular Safety of the ß3 -Adrenoceptor Agonist Mirabegron and the Antimuscarinic Agent Solifenacin in the SYNERGY Trial.

There have been concerns that treatment of overactive bladder with ß3 -adrenoceptor agonists may potentially have detrimental cardiovascular (CV) side effects. We evaluated the CV safety of mirabegron, a ß3 -adrenoceptor agonist, alone and in combination therapy with the antimuscarinic agent solifenacin. The SYNERGY trial was a multinational, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo and active-controlled phase 3 trial. Patients were randomized to receive solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg (combination 5 + 50 mg), solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg (combination 5 + 25 mg), solifenacin 5 mg monotherapy, mirabegron 25 mg monotherapy, mirabegron 50 mg monotherapy, or placebo for a 12-week double-blind treatment period. A total of 3398 patients were included in the study. Mean changes from baseline to the end of therapy in ECG parameters were similar across treatment groups, although there was an increase in heart rate of 1 beat/minute in the mirabegron treatment groups. There were no clinically meaningful differences in change from baseline in QTcF between monotherapies and placebo and between monotherapies and combination therapy. There were very few major CV events: 1 of 853 (0.1%) with a nonfatal myocardial infarction in the combination 5 + 25 mg group, 2 of 848 (0.2%) with a nonfatal stroke in the combination 5 + 50 mg group, and no events in the other groups. This CV safety analysis of the combination of mirabegron and solifenacin showed rates of CV events comparable with those for monotherapy treatments based on assessments of vital signs, electrocardiograms, and adjudicated CV events.

A strategy utilizing ambulatory monitoring and home and clinic blood pressure measurements to optimize the safety evaluation of noncardiovascular drugs with potential for hemodynamic effects: a report from the SYNERGY trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to perform a blood pressure (BP) safety evaluation in patients with an overactive bladder receiving solifenacin (an antimuscarinic agent), mirabegron (a ß3-adrenoceptor agonist), or both compared with placebo in the SYNERGY trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive solifenacin 5 mg+mirabegron 50 mg (combination 5+50 mg); solifenacin 5 mg+mirabegron 25 mg (combination 5+25 mg); solifenacin 5 mg; mirabegron 50 mg; mirabegron 25 mg; or placebo for a double-blind 12-week treatment period. Systolic BP, diastolic BP, and heart rate were measured by ambulatory BP monitoring, and in the clinic or home. RESULTS: A total of 715 patients were analyzed in an ambulatory BP monitoring substudy. At the end of treatment, ambulatory BP monitoring measurements showed no consistent increases from baseline in the mean 24-h systolic BP or diastolic BP for combination versus monotherapy groups or for monotherapy groups versus placebo. Analysis of 1-h BP averages during the 6 h range that included the Tmax values of both study drugs showed no significant BP effects. Shift analysis (switch between different normotension/hypertension stages) did not show differences among the active and placebo groups, nor did outlier analysis of major BP changes differ between placebo and active treatment. Similarly, there were no significant signals in the 24-h heart rate. Office and home measurements were consistent with ambulatory BP monitoring findings. CONCLUSIONS: A paradigm of ambulatory BP monitoring analysis designed to test BP safety of noncardiovascular drugs showed that solifenacin plus mirabegron combination therapy during 12 weeks produced no meaningful changes in BP or heart rate.

A clinical perspective on the analysis and presentation of the number of incontinence episodes following treatment for OAB.

AIMS: To provide a clinical view and interpretation on the methods for analysis of incontinence in patients with overactive bladder. METHODS: Results are analyzed using the total number of incontinence episodes in a 3-day diary period, using fixed and random effect Poisson regression models to calculate ratio of event rates and 95% confidence interval (CI) together with P-values and are compared with the analysis of the mean number of incontinence episodes/24 hr using analysis of covariance models to calculate P-values and 95% CI for the difference between treatments. RESULTS: Using random effects Poisson regression models demonstrated that the number of incontinence episodes was reduced by 26% more with mirabegron 50 mg than with placebo. For solifenacin 5 and 10 mg, treatment resulted in a 43% (41%) greater decrease in the number of incontinence episodes compared with placebo. CONCLUSION: Instead of providing a fixed number of incontinence episodes/24 hr that reflects the mean effect, the estimate using Poisson methodology provides an efficacy estimate that can be interpreted in the context of, and relative to, the patient's baseline (severity). Using the total number of incontinence episodes in the diary period, and expressing this as percent decrease in the number of episodes, may be easier to interpret; for example, because this results in a relative measure of effect that provides an alternative understanding of a patient's improvement at end of treatment compared with the comparator arm. Also, it is based on statistical methods that are more suitable for the analysis of count data. Neurourol. Urodynam. 35:728-732, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.