Colonoscopic-assisted laparoscopic wedge resection for colonic neoplasms: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: The current literature describes a variety of techniques detailed under the name of combined endoscopic-laparoscopic surgery (CELS) procedures. This systematic review of literature assessed the outcomes of colonoscopic-assisted laparoscopic-wedge resection (CAL-WR) in particular to evaluate its feasibility to remove colonic lesions that do not qualify for endoscopic resection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane) were searched for studies evaluating CAL-WR for the treatment of colonic lesions. Studies with missing full text, language other than English, systematic reviews, and studies with fewer than ten patients were excluded. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: Out of 68 results, duplicate studies (n = 27) as well as studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria (n = 32) were removed. Nine studies were included, encompassing 326 patients who underwent a CAL-WR of the colon. The technical success rate varied from 93 to 100%, with an R0 resection rate of 91-100%. Morbidity ranged from 6% to 20%. The quality of the included studies was rated as low to moderate and contained heterogeneous terminology, methodology, and outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient high-quality data and substantial variation in outcome measures to draw firm conclusions regarding the value of CAL-WR. Although CAL-WR is a promising local resection technique for endoscopically unremovable neoplasms of the colon, further investigation of this technique in well-designed prospective, multicenter studies with predefined outcome measures is required.Trial registration: A protocol for this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO with the number CRD42023407966.

Psoriasis seems often underdiagnosed in patient with axial spondyloarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is known to be associated with several extra-skeletal manifestations (ESM), including the inflammatory skin disease psoriasis. It is important to recognize and diagnose psoriasis timely in axSpA in order to provide optimal treatment and outcome for both axSpA and psoriasis. METHODS: In this observational study, all patients from the Dutch Groningen Leeuwarden Axial Spondyloarthritis (GLAS) cohort included before June 2016 were sent a questionnaire with self-screening psoriasis questions including prototypical color pictures. RESULTS: Of the 592 questionnaires sent, 448 (75.7%) were eligible for analysis. Of these 448 respondents, 58 (13%) had a positive self-screening for psoriasis symptoms, currently or in the past. In 28 (48%) of 58 patients, psoriasis diagnosis could be verified by medical records, resulting in a psoriasis prevalence rate of 6.3%. In comparison with patients with a confirmed psoriasis diagnosis, patients reporting psoriasis symptoms without a verified diagnosis mentioned more mild than moderate-severe psoriasis symptoms (25% vs. 3%, p = 0.02), and their psoriasis lesions were less often located on the torso area (3% vs. 18%, p = 0.04), the intergluteal cleft (0% vs. 25%, p = 0.02), and legs (7% vs. 43%, p < 0.01). Of the 31 axSpA patients who reported currently active psoriasis, 74% had only mild psoriasis symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Especially mild psoriasis seems often underdiagnosed in patients with axSpA using a patient questionnaire with prototypical pictures of psoriasis lesions. This questionnaire could be beneficial in tracing patients with undiagnosed psoriasis in daily clinical practice. As a next step, further validation of this questionnaire is needed.