Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol ; 230(3): 372-82, 2008 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18486175

ABSTRACT

There is concern widely on the increase in human exposure to exogenous (anti)estrogenic compounds. Typical are certain ingredients in cosmetic consumer products such as musks, phthalates and parabens. Monitoring a variety of human samples revealed that these ingredients, including the ones that generally are considered to undergo rapid metabolism, are present at low levels. In this in vitro research individual compounds and combinations of parabens and endogenous estradiol (E(2)) were investigated in the MCF-7 cell proliferation assay. The experimental design applied a concentration addition model (CA). Data were analyzed with the estrogen equivalency (EEQ) and method of isoboles approach. In addition, the catalytic inhibitory properties of parabens on an enzyme involved in a rate limiting step in steroid genesis (aromatase) were studied in human placental microsomes. Our results point to an additive estrogenic effect in a CA model for parabens. In addition, it was found that parabens inhibit aromatase. Noticeably, the effective levels in both our in vitro systems were far higher than the levels detected in human samples. However, estrogenic compounds may contribute in a cumulative way to the circulating estrogen burden. Our calculation for the extra estrogen burden due to exposure to parabens, phthalates and polycyclic musks indicates an insignificant estrogenic load relative to the endogenous or therapeutic estrogen burden.


Subject(s)
Aromatase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Cosmetics/adverse effects , Estrogens/adverse effects , Parabens/adverse effects , Preservatives, Pharmaceutical/adverse effects , Catalysis , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Microsomes/enzymology , Placenta/enzymology
2.
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol ; 228(3): 269-76, 2008 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18201740

ABSTRACT

Interference of exogenous chemicals with the aromatase enzyme can be useful as a tool to identify chemicals that could act either chemopreventive for hormone-dependent cancer or adverse endocrine disruptive. Aromatase is the key enzyme in the biosynthesis of steroids, as it converts androgens to estrogens. Certain flavonoids, plant derived chemicals, are known catalytic aromatase inhibitors. Various systems are in use to test aromatase inhibitory properties of compounds. Commonly used are microsomes derived from ovary or placental tissue characterized by high aromatase activity. To a lesser extent whole cell systems are used and specifically cell systems that are potential target tissue in breast cancer development. In this study aromatase inhibitory properties of fadrozole, 8-prenylnaringenin and a synthetic lactone (TM-7) were determined in human placental microsomes and in human primary breast fibroblasts. In addition, apigenin, chrysin, naringenin and two synthetic lactones (TM-8 and TM-9) were tested in human microsomes only. Comparison of the aromatase inhibitory potencies of these compounds between the two test systems showed that the measurement of aromatase inhibition in human placental microsomes is a good predictor of aromatase inhibition in human breast fibroblasts.


Subject(s)
Aromatase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Flavonoids/pharmacology , Lactones/pharmacology , Breast/enzymology , Catalysis , Cells, Cultured , Female , Fibroblasts/enzymology , Humans , Microsomes/enzymology , Placenta/enzymology , Structure-Activity Relationship
3.
Food Chem Toxicol ; 45(11): 2319-30, 2007 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17651883

ABSTRACT

Humans are exposed to a variety of food-borne phytochemicals (PC) as well as synthetic chemicals (SC). Some of these compounds have been reported to have estrogenic or anti-estrogenic properties and are therefore suspected endocrine disruptors. Until now it remains unclear if non-additive effects occur in combinations with endogenous estrogens, such as 17beta-estradiol (E(2)). To investigate such interactions, several PC and SC were tested individually, in mixtures and as combinations of mixtures with E(2) for effects on ERalpha receptor mediated cell proliferation and estrogen regulated pS2 expression level in MCF-7(bus) cells. PCs (coumestrol, genistein, naringenin, catechin, epicatechin, quercetin) or SCs (4-nonylphenol, octylphenol, beta-hexachlorocyclohexane, bisphenol A, methoxychlor, dibutyl phthalate) were mixed (PCmix and SCmix) either in concentrations reflecting human serum concentrations or at equipotent concentrations for estrogenicity. EC(50) values were applied in two approaches of the concentration-addition model (the method of isoboles and the cumulative estrogen equivalency method) to assess mixture effects. In both models PCmix and SCmix or combinations of the mixtures with E(2) showed no departure from additivity. In conclusion, the tested PCs and SCs appeared to act as (full) agonists for the estrogen receptor and interacted in mixtures and with estradiol in an additive way. In addition, it is concluded that the possible contribution of food-borne PCs to the estrogenic effect of xenobiotics is likely to be more significant than that caused by food-borne SCs.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Estrogens/pharmacology , Tumor Suppressor Proteins/metabolism , Adenocarcinoma/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Cell Line, Tumor , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Environmental Exposure , Estrogen Receptor alpha/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Humans , Plant Extracts/chemistry , Plant Extracts/pharmacology , Trefoil Factor-1 , Tumor Suppressor Proteins/genetics
4.
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol ; 221(3): 372-83, 2007 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17482226

ABSTRACT

In the public opinion, phytochemicals (PCs) present in the human diet are often considered beneficial (e.g. by preventing breast cancer). Two possible mechanisms that could modulate tumor growth are via interaction with the estrogen receptor (ER) and inhibition of aromatase (CYP19). Multiple in vitro studies confirmed that these compounds act estrogenic, thus potentially induce tumor growth, as well as aromatase inhibitory, thus potentially reduce tumor growth. It is thought that in the in vivo situation breast epithelial (tumor) cells communicate with surrounding connective tissue by means of cytokines, prostaglandins and estradiol forming a complex feedback mechanism. Recently our laboratory developed an in vitro co-culture model of healthy mammary fibroblasts and MCF-7 cells that (at least partly) simulated this feedback mechanism (M. Heneweer et al., TAAP vol. 202(1): 50-58, 2005). In the present study biochanin A, chrysin, naringenin, apigenin, genistein and quercetin were studied for their estrogenic properties (cell proliferation, pS2 mRNA) and aromatase inhibition in MCF-7 breast tumor cells, healthy mammary fibroblasts and their co-culture. The proliferative potency of these compounds in the MCF-7 cells derived from their EC(50)s decreased in the following order: estadiol (4*10(-3) nM)>biochanin A (9 nM)>genistein (32 nM)>testosterone (46 nM)>naringenin (287 nM)>apigenin (440 nM)>chrysin (4 microM). The potency to inhibit aromatase derived from their IC(50)s decreased in the following order: chrysin (1.5 microM)>naringenin (2.2 microM)>genistein (3.6 microM)>apigenin (4.1 microM)>biochanin A (25 microM)>quercetin (30 microM). The results of these studies show that these PCs can induce cell proliferation or inhibit aromatase in the same concentration range (1-10 microM). Results from co-cultures did not elucidate the dominant effect of these compounds. MCF-7 cell proliferation occurs at concentrations that are not uncommon in blood of individuals using food supplements. Results also indicate that estrogenicity of these PCs is quantitatively more sensitive than aromatase inhibition. It is suggested that perhaps a more cautionary approach should be taken for these PCs before taken as food supplements.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/metabolism , Aromatase/metabolism , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Fibroblasts/metabolism , Mammary Glands, Human/drug effects , Phytoestrogens/pharmacology , Aromatase/drug effects , Aromatase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Cell Communication/drug effects , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Coculture Techniques , Dietary Supplements , Estrogen Receptor Modulators/pharmacology , Fibroblasts/drug effects , Humans , Mammary Glands, Human/cytology
5.
Toxicol Lett ; 170(2): 165-76, 2007 Apr 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17428625

ABSTRACT

Through the diet humans are exposed to many weak estrogenic phytochemicals (PCs) and synthetic chemicals (SCs), but most experimental studies used individual compounds rather than mixtures. Estrogenic effects were determined in the rat juvenile uterotrophic assay using a predefined phytochemical mixture (PCmix) containing coumestrol, genistein, naringenin, (+,-)catechin, (-,-)epicatechin and quercetin, and a predefined synthetic chemical mixture (SCmix) containing nonyl-, and octylphenol, beta-hexachlorocyclohexane, methoxychlor, bisphenol A and dibutylphthalate. The mixture composition was based on human dietary uptake and actual ratios in serum. 17beta-Estradiol and genistein were also tested individually. It was found that combinations of phytoestrogens and exogenous 17beta-estradiol act additive. In contrast SCmix, inactive by itself even at high dose levels relative to human exposure, caused no synergistic or antagonistic uterotrophic effect with E(2) and/or the PCmix. Based on ED(05) and ED(01) values of the PCmix the margin of exposure in regular human diet for a uterotrophic effect is estimated many orders of magnitude. However, food supplements with phytochemicals might bring individual exposure around ED(05) and ED(01) values of the PCmix. Based on the results of our study the contribution of SCs to total estrogenicity in human diet can probably be neglected.


Subject(s)
Complex Mixtures/pharmacology , Phytoestrogens/pharmacology , Uterus/drug effects , Xenobiotics/pharmacology , Animals , Biological Assay , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Injections, Subcutaneous , Organ Size/drug effects , Rats , Sexual Maturation , Uterus/growth & development , Uterus/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...