Temporary omission of oral anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: rationale and design of the WOEST-3 randomised trial.

The optimal antithrombotic management of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who require oral anticoagulation (OAC) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unclear. Current guidelines recommend dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT; OAC plus P2Y12 inhibitor - preferably clopidogrel) after a short course of triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT; DAT plus aspirin). Although DAT reduces bleeding risk compared to TAT, this is counterbalanced by an increase in ischaemic events. Aspirin provides early ischaemic benefit, but TAT is associated with an increased haemorrhagic burden; therefore, we propose a 30-day dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT; aspirin plus P2Y12 inhibitor) strategy post-PCI, temporarily omitting OAC. The study aims to compare bleeding and ischaemic risk between a 30-day DAPT strategy following PCI and a guideline-directed therapy in AF patients requiring OAC. WOEST-3 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04436978) is an investigator-initiated, international, open-label, randomised controlled trial (RCT). AF patients requiring OAC who have undergone successful PCI will be randomised within 72 hours after PCI to guideline-directed therapy (edoxaban plus P2Y12 inhibitor plus limited duration of aspirin) or a 30-day DAPT strategy (P2Y12 inhibitor plus aspirin, immediately discontinuing OAC) followed by DAT (edoxaban plus P2Y12 inhibitor). With a sample size of 2,000 patients, this trial is powered to assess both superiority for major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding and non-inferiority for a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, systemic embolism or stent thrombosis. In summary, the WOEST-3 trial is the first RCT temporarily omitting OAC in AF patients, comparing a 30-day DAPT strategy with guideline-directed therapy post-PCI to reduce bleeding events without hampering efficacy.

CT as gatekeeper of invasive coronary angiography in patients with suspected CAD.

Cardiac CT has been accepted as a valuable diagnostic tool in today's patient care. However, several other noninvasive, in particular, functional diagnostic tests are available on the menu for the ordering clinician and target more or less the same patient population. These tests come with a cost and financial constraints in the present economic environment will no longer allow its indiscriminate use. The gatekeeper function of a diagnostic testing strategy implies that a test is selected judiciously with the aim of preventing access to invasive yet expensive coronary angiography. On the basis of current knowledge, cardiac CT stands a good chance to claim the position of effective gatekeeper to the cathlab.

Prediction model to estimate presence of coronary artery disease: retrospective pooled analysis of existing cohorts.

OBJECTIVES: To develop prediction models that better estimate the pretest probability of coronary artery disease in low prevalence populations. DESIGN: Retrospective pooled analysis of individual patient data. SETTING: 18 hospitals in Europe and the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with stable chest pain without evidence for previous coronary artery disease, if they were referred for computed tomography (CT) based coronary angiography or catheter based coronary angiography (indicated as low and high prevalence settings, respectively). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Obstructive coronary artery disease (≥ 50% diameter stenosis in at least one vessel found on catheter based coronary angiography). Multiple imputation accounted for missing predictors and outcomes, exploiting strong correlation between the two angiography procedures. Predictive models included a basic model (age, sex, symptoms, and setting), clinical model (basic model factors and diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, and smoking), and extended model (clinical model factors and use of the CT based coronary calcium score). We assessed discrimination (c statistic), calibration, and continuous net reclassification improvement by cross validation for the four largest low prevalence datasets separately and the smaller remaining low prevalence datasets combined. RESULTS: We included 5677 patients (3283 men, 2394 women), of whom 1634 had obstructive coronary artery disease found on catheter based coronary angiography. All potential predictors were significantly associated with the presence of disease in univariable and multivariable analyses. The clinical model improved the prediction, compared with the basic model (cross validated c statistic improvement from 0.77 to 0.79, net reclassification improvement 35%); the coronary calcium score in the extended model was a major predictor (0.79 to 0.88, 102%). Calibration for low prevalence datasets was satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: Updated prediction models including age, sex, symptoms, and cardiovascular risk factors allow for accurate estimation of the pretest probability of coronary artery disease in low prevalence populations. Addition of coronary calcium scores to the prediction models improves the estimates.

CRosser As First choice for crossing Totally occluded coronary arteries (CRAFT Registry): focus on conventional angiography and computed tomography angiography predictors of success.

AIMS: We investigated the use of the CROSSER catheter, a CTO crossing device based upon high frequency mechanical vibration, as a first resort to treat patients with chronic total occlusions (CTO) while describing angiographic and computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) serving as predictors for success. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty consecutive patients were enrolled in this prospective multicentre registry of patients treated for a CTO. For 76.3% of the patients, this was the first attempt to open the CTO. Overall success rate was 75%. By conventional coronary angiography, the length of the occlusion was 26.7±14.1 mm and there was a difference in successful vs. unsuccessful cases (24.5±13.9 and 32.8±13.1, p=0.02). The presence of angulation, as defined qualitatively, was more prevalent in failed cases (60.0% vs. 32.2%, p=0.03). The mean ratio CROSSER distance within the occlusion site and length of the occlusion showed a trend towards statistical significance in successful procedures (0.56±0.90 vs. 0.30±0.34, p=0.08). During hospitalisation, two patients had a non-fatal myocardial infarction. One patient experienced delayed onset of tamponade six hours postprocedure. At 30 days, two patients had PCI in a non-treated vessel and one patient had a transient ischaemic attack. Relation to the CROSSER catheter was inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: The success rate of the use of a dedicated-CTO device--the CROSSER catheter--as a first choice to open a chronic total occlusion was 75%. By multivariate analysis, in a subset of patients that were imaged with computed tomography coronary angiography, the absence of angulation was related with higher success rate.

A clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: validation, updating, and extension.

AIMS: The aim was to validate, update, and extend the Diamond-Forrester model for estimating the probability of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in a contemporary cohort. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prospectively collected data from 14 hospitals on patients with chest pain without a history of CAD and referred for conventional coronary angiography (CCA) were used. Primary outcome was obstructive CAD, defined as ≥ 50% stenosis in one or more vessels on CCA. The validity of the Diamond-Forrester model was assessed using calibration plots, calibration-in-the-large, and recalibration in logistic regression. The model was subsequently updated and extended by revising the predictive value of age, sex, and type of chest pain. Diagnostic performance was assessed by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (c-statistic) and reclassification was determined. We included 2260 patients, of whom 1319 had obstructive CAD on CCA. Validation demonstrated an overestimation of the CAD probability, especially in women. The updated and extended models demonstrated a c-statistic of 0.79 (95% CI 0.77-0.81) and 0.82 (95% CI 0.80-0.84), respectively. Sixteen per cent of men and 64% of women were correctly reclassified. The predicted probability of obstructive CAD ranged from 10% for 50-year-old females with non-specific chest pain to 91% for 80-year-old males with typical chest pain. Predictions varied across hospitals due to differences in disease prevalence. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the Diamond-Forrester model overestimates the probability of CAD especially in women. We updated the predictive effects of age, sex, type of chest pain, and hospital setting which improved model performance and we extended it to include patients of 70 years and older.

Incremental value of the CT coronary calcium score for the prediction of coronary artery disease.

OBJECTIVES: To validate published prediction models for the presence of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with new onset stable typical or atypical angina pectoris and to assess the incremental value of the CT coronary calcium score (CTCS). METHODS: We searched the literature for clinical prediction rules for the diagnosis of obstructive CAD, defined as ≥50% stenosis in at least one vessel on conventional coronary angiography. Significant variables were re-analysed in our dataset of 254 patients with logistic regression. CTCS was subsequently included in the models. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated to assess diagnostic performance. RESULTS: Re-analysing the variables used by Diamond & Forrester yielded an AUC of 0.798, which increased to 0.890 by adding CTCS. For Pryor, Morise 1994, Morise 1997 and Shaw the AUC increased from 0.838 to 0.901, 0.831 to 0.899, 0.840 to 0.898 and 0.833 to 0.899. CTCS significantly improved model performance in each model. CONCLUSIONS: Validation demonstrated good diagnostic performance across all models. CTCS improves the prediction of the presence of obstructive CAD, independent of clinical predictors, and should be considered in its diagnostic work-up.

Diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of noninvasive testing for coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) has become a popular noninvasive test for diagnosing coronary artery disease. OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy and clinical utility of stress testing and CTCA for identifying patients who require invasive coronary angiography (ICA). DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: University medical center in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. PATIENTS: 517 patients referred by their treating physicians for evaluation of chest symptoms by using stress testing or ICA. INTERVENTION: Stress testing and CTCA in all patients. MEASUREMENTS: Diagnostic accuracy of stress testing and CTCA compared with ICA; pretest probabilities of disease by Duke clinical score; and clinical utility of noninvasive testing, defined as a pretest or posttest probability that suggests how to proceed with testing (no further testing if < or =5%, proceed with ICA if between 5% and 90%, and refer directly for ICA if > or =90%). RESULTS: Stress testing was not as accurate as CTCA; CTCA sensitivity approached 100%. In patients with a low (<20%) pretest probability of disease, negative stress test or CTCA results suggested no need for ICA. In patients with an intermediate (20% to 80%) pretest probability, a positive CTCA result suggested need to proceed with ICA (posttest probability, 93% [95% CI, 92% to 93%]) and a negative result suggested no need for further testing (posttest probability, 1% [CI, 1% to 1%]). Physicians could proceed directly with ICA in patients with a high (>80%) pretest probability (91% [CI, 90% to 92%]). LIMITATIONS: Referral and verification bias might have influenced findings. Stress testing provides functional information that may add value to that from anatomical (CTCA or ICA) imaging. CONCLUSION: Computed tomography coronary angiography seems most valuable in patients with intermediate pretest probability of disease, because the test can distinguish which of these patients need invasive angiography. These findings need to be confirmed before CTCA can be routinely recommended for these patients.

Impact of heart rate frequency and variability on radiation exposure, image quality, and diagnostic performance in dual-source spiral CT coronary angiography.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of heart rate frequency (HRF) and heart rate variability (HRV) on radiation exposure, image quality, and diagnostic performance to help detect significant stenosis (> or =50% lumen diameter reduction) by using adaptive electrocardiographic (ECG) pulsing at dual-source (DS) spiral computed tomographic (CT) coronary angiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review committee approval and informed consent were obtained. No prescan beta-blockers were applied. Unenhanced CT and CT coronary angiography with adaptive ECG pulsing were performed in 927 consecutive patients (600 men, 327 women; mean age, 60.3 years +/- 11.0 [standard deviation]) divided in three HRF groups: low, intermediate, and high (< or =65, 66-79, and > or =80 beats/min, respectively), and four HRV groups given mean interbeat difference (IBD) during CT coronary angiography: normal, minor, moderate, and severe (IBDs of 0-1, 2-3, 4-10, and >10, respectively). Radiation exposure and image quality were also evaluated. In 444 of these, diagnostic performance was presented as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPVs), and negative predictive values and likelihood ratios with corresponding 95% confidence intervals by using quantitative coronary angiography as the reference standard. RESULTS: CT coronary angiography yielded good image quality in 98% of patients and no significant differences in image quality were found among HRF and HRV groups. Radiation exposure was significantly higher in patients with low versus high HRF and in patients with severe versus normal HRV. No significant differences among HRF and HRV groups in image quality and diagnostic performance were found. A nonsignificant trend was found toward a lower specificity and PPV in patients with a high HRF or severe HRV when compared with low HRF or normal HRV in patients with a low calcium score (Agatston score <100). CONCLUSION: DS spiral CT coronary angiography performed with adaptive ECG pulsing results in preserved diagnostic image quality and performance independent of HRF or HRV at the cost of limited dose reduction in arrhythmic patients.

Is there a role for CT coronary angiography in patients with symptomatic angina? Effect of coronary calcium score on identification of stenosis.

Present guidelines discourage the use of CT coronary angiography (CTCA) in symptomatic angina patients. We examined the relation between coronary calcium score (CS) and the performance of CTCA in patients with stable and unstable angina in order to understand under which conditions CTCA might be a gate-keeper to conventional coronary angiography (CCA) in such patients. We included 360 patients between 50 and 70 years old with stable and unstable angina who were clinically referred for CCA irrespective of CS. Patients received CS and CCTA on 64-slice scanners in a multicenter cross-sectional trial. The institutional review board approved the study. Diagnostic performance of CTCA to detect or rule out significant coronary artery disease was calculated on a per patient level in pre-defined CS categories. The prevalence of significant coronary artery disease strongly increased with CS. Negative CTCA were associated with a negative likelihood ratio of <0.1 independent of CS. Positive CTCA was associated with a high positive likelihood ratio of 9.4 if CS was <10. However, for higher CS the positive likelihood ratio never exceeded 3.0 and for CS >400 it decreased to 1.3. In the 62 (17%) patients with CS <10, CTCA reliably identified the 42 (68%) of these patients without significant CAD, at no false negative CTCA scans. In symptomatic angina patients, a negative CTCA reliably excludes significant CAD but the additional value of CTCA decreases sharply with CS >10 and especially with CS >400. In patients with CS <10, CTCA provides excellent diagnostic performance.

Computed tomography in total coronary occlusions (CTTO registry): radiation exposure and predictors of successful percutaneous intervention.

AIMS: There is no mention in the current "appropriateness criteria for CTCA" of the need of CTCA investigation prior to an attempt at recanalisation of a CTO. To define better the role of CTCA in the treatment of patients with CTOs, we performed CTCA in a consecutive cohort of eligible patients who were scheduled for percutaneous recanalisation of a CTO. METHODS AND RESULTS: Symptomatic patients due to a CTO suitable for percutaneous treatment were included. One hundred and thirty-nine (142 CTOs) patients were studied. Overall success rate was 62.7%. By CTCA, the occlusion length was 24.9 +/- 18.3 vs. 30.7 +/- 20.7 mm in successful and failed cases (p = 0.1), but the frequency of patients with an occlusion length >15 mm was different, i.e., 63.2% vs. 82.7%, respectively (p = 0.02). Severe calcification, (> 50% CSA) was more prevalent in failed cases (54.7% vs. 35.9%, p = 0.03). Calcification at the entry of the occlusion was present in 58.5% of the failures vs. 41.6% of the successful cases (p = 0.04), while calcium at the exit was not different. The length of calcification was 8.5 +/- 8.4 vs. 5.5 +/- 6.6 mm in the failed and successful cases respectively (p = 0.027). By multivariable analysis, the only independent predictor of procedural success was the absence of severe calcification as defined by CTCA. The mean effective radiation dose of the PCI was 39.3 +/- 30.1 mSv. The mean effective radiation dose of CT scan was 22.4 mSv: 19.2 +/- 6.5 mSv for contrast-enhanced scan, 3.2 +/- 1.7 mSv for calcium scoring scan. CONCLUSIONS: More severe calcified patterns, as assessed by CTCA, are seen in failed cases. The radiation exposure during a CT scan prior to a CTO PCI is considerable, and further studies are required to determine whether this extra diagnostic study is warranted.

Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTCA) to detect or rule out significant coronary artery disease (CAD). BACKGROUND: CTCA is emerging as a noninvasive technique to detect coronary atherosclerosis. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study involving 360 symptomatic patients with acute and stable anginal syndromes who were between 50 and 70 years of age and were referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography (CCA) from September 2004 through June 2006. All patients underwent a nonenhanced calcium scan and a CTCA, which was compared with CCA. No patients or segments were excluded because of impaired image quality attributable to either coronary motion or calcifications. Patient-, vessel-, and segment-based sensitivities and specificities were calculated to detect or rule out significant CAD, defined as >or=50% lumen diameter reduction. RESULTS: The prevalence among patients of having at least 1 significant stenosis was 68%. In a patient-based analysis, the sensitivity for detecting patients with significant CAD was 99% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 98% to 100%), specificity was 64% (95% CI: 55% to 73%), positive predictive value was 86% (95% CI: 82% to 90%), and negative predictive value was 97% (95% CI: 94% to 100%). In a segment-based analysis, the sensitivity was 88% (95% CI: 85% to 91%), specificity was 90% (95% CI: 89% to 92%), positive predictive value was 47% (95% CI: 44% to 51%), and negative predictive value was 99% (95% CI: 98% to 99%). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients in whom a decision had already been made to obtain CCA, 64-slice CTCA was reliable for ruling out significant CAD in patients with stable and unstable anginal syndromes. A positive 64-slice CTCA scan often overestimates the severity of atherosclerotic obstructions and requires further testing to guide patient management.

Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive visual (computed tomography coronary angiography [CTCA]) and quantitative computed tomography coronary angiography (QCT) to predict the hemodynamic significance of a coronary stenosis, using intracoronary fractional flow reserve (FFR) as the reference standard. BACKGROUND: It has been demonstrated that CTCA provides excellent diagnostic sensitivity for identifying coronary stenoses, but may lack accurate delineation of the hemodynamic significance. METHODS: We investigated 79 patients with stable angina pectoris who underwent both 64-slice or dual-source CTCA and FFR measurement of discrete coronary stenoses. CTCA and conventional coronary angiography (CCA), and QCT and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), were performed to determine the severity of a stenosis that was compared with FFR measurements. A significant anatomical or functional stenosis was defined as >/=50% diameter stenosis or an FFR <0.75. Stented segments and bypass grafts were not included in the analysis. RESULTS: A total of 89 stenoses were evaluated of which 18% (16 of 89) had an FFR <0.75. The diagnostic accuracy of CTCA, QCT, CCA, and QCA to detect a hemodynamically significant coronary lesion was 49%, 71%, 61%, and 67%, respectively. Correlation between QCT and QCA with FFR measurement was weak (R values of -0.32 and -0.30, respectively). Correlation between QCT and QCA was significant, but only moderate (R = 0.53; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The anatomical assessment of the hemodynamic significance of coronary stenoses determined by visual CTCA, CCA, or QCT or QCA does not correlate well with the functional assessment of FFR. Determining the hemodynamic significance of an angiographically intermediate stenosis remains relevant before referral for revascularization treatment.

Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in women versus men with angina pectoris.

We compared the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomographic (CT) coronary angiography to detect significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in women and men. The 64-slice CT coronary angiography was performed in 402 symptomatic patients, 123 women and 279 men, with CAD prevalence of 51% and 68%, respectively. Significant CAD, defined as > or =50% coronary stenosis on quantitative coronary angiography, was evaluated on a patient, vessel, and segment level. The sensitivity and negative predictive value to detect significant CAD was very good, both for women and men (100% vs 99%, p = NS; 100% vs 98%, p = NS), whereas diagnostic accuracy (88% vs 96%; p <0.01), specificity (75% vs 90%, p <0.05), and positive predictive value (81% vs 95%, p <0.001) were lower in women. The per-segment analysis demonstrated lower sensitivity in women compared with men (82% vs 93%, p <0.001). The sensitivity in women did not show a difference in proximal and midsegments, but was significantly lower in distal segments (56% vs 85%, p <0.05) and side branches (54% vs 89%, p <0.001). In conclusion, CT coronary angiography reliably rules out the presence of obstructive CAD in both men and women. Specificity and positive predictive value of CT coronary angiography were lower in women. The sensitivity to detect stenosis in small coronary branches was lower in women compared with men.

Three-year clinical outcomes after coronary stenting of chronic total occlusion using sirolimus-eluting stents: insights from the rapamycin-eluting stent evaluated at Rotterdam cardiology hospital-(RESEARCH) registry.

BACKGROUND: We previously reported that the 1-year survival-free from target lesion revascularization was 97.4% in patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO) treated with sirolimus-eluting stents (SES). There are currently no long-term results of the efficacy of SES in this subset of lesions. We assessed the 3-year clinical outcomes of 147 patients with CTO treated with either SES or bare metal stents (BMS). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 147 (BMS = 71, SES = 76) patients were included. Four patients died in the BMS group while five patients died in the SES group, P = 0.8; two myocardial infarctions occurred in both groups, P = 0.9; and target vessel revascularization was performed in nine patients in the BMS and seven in the SES group, P = 0.5. The cumulative event-free survival of MACE was 81.7% in BMS group and 84.2% in SES group, P = 0.7. Two patients of the SES group had a coronary aneurism at 3-year angiographic follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The use of SES was no longer associated with significantly lower rates of target vessel revascularization and major adverse cardiac events in patients with CTOs after 3 years of follow-up compared with BMSs.

64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with high, intermediate, or low pretest probability of significant coronary artery disease.

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the usefulness of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) to detect or rule out coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with various estimated pretest probabilities of CAD. BACKGROUND: The pretest probability of the presence of CAD may impact the diagnostic performance of CTCA. METHODS: Sixty-four-slice CTCA (Sensation 64, Siemens, Forchheim, Germany) was performed in 254 symptomatic patients. Patients with heart rates > or =65 beats/min received beta-blockers before CTCA. The pretest probability for significant CAD was estimated by type of chest discomfort, age, gender, and traditional risk factors and defined as high (> or =71%), intermediate (31% to 70%), and low (< or =30%). Significant CAD was defined as the presence of at least 1 > or =50% coronary stenosis on quantitative coronary angiography, which was the standard of reference. No coronary segments were excluded from analysis. RESULTS: The estimated pretest probability of CAD in the high (n = 105), intermediate (n = 83), and low (n = 66) groups was 87%, 53%, and 13%, respectively. The diagnostic performance of the computed tomography (CT) scan was different in the 3 subgroups. The estimated post-test probability of the presence of significant CAD after a negative CT scan was 17%, 0%, and 0% and after a positive CT scan was 96%, 88%, and 68%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Computed tomography coronary angiography is useful in symptomatic patients with a low or intermediate estimated pretest probability of having significant CAD, and a negative CT scan reliably rules out the presence of significant CAD. Computed tomography coronary angiography does not provide additional relevant diagnostic information in symptomatic patients with a high estimated pretest probability of CAD.

Angiographic stent thrombosis after routine use of drug-eluting stents in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the importance of thrombus burden.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate the impact of thrombus burden on the clinical outcome and angiographic infarct-related artery stent thrombosis (IRA-ST) in patients routinely treated with drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). BACKGROUND: There are limited data for the safety and effectiveness of DES in STEMI. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 812 consecutive patients treated with DES implantation for STEMI. Intracoronary thrombus burden was angiographically estimated and categorized as large thrombus burden (LTB), defined as thrombus burden > or =2 vessel diameters, and small thrombus burden (STB) to predict clinical outcomes. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined as death, repeat myocardial infarction, and IRA reintervention. RESULTS: Mean duration of follow-up was 18.2 +/- 7.8 months. Large thrombus burden was an independent predictor of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.76, p = 0.023) and MACE (HR 1.88, p = 0.001). The cumulative angiographic IRA-ST was 1.1% at 30 days and 3.2% at 2 years, and continued to augment beyond 2 years. It was significantly higher in the LTB compared with the STB group (8.2% vs. 1.3% at 2 years, respectively, p < 0.001). Significant independent predictors for IRA-ST were LTB (HR 8.73, p < 0.001), stent thrombosis at presentation (HR 6.24, p = 0.001), bifurcation stenting (HR 4.06, p = 0.002), age (HR 0.55, p = 0.003), and rheolytic thrombectomy (HR 0.11, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Large thrombus burden is an independent predictor of MACE and IRA-ST in patients treated with DES for STEMI.

Detection and characterization of coronary bifurcation lesions with 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography.

AIMS: To compare the performance of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in the detection and classification (according to the Medina system) of bifurcation lesions (BLs). METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 323 consecutive patients undergoing 64-slice CTCA prior to ICA. All coronary segments >or=2 mm in diameter were evaluated for the presence of a significant (>or=50% diameter reduction on quantitative coronary angiography) BL. Evaluation of BL by CTCA included the assessment of significant lumen obstruction in both main and side branch vessels. Forty-one out of 43 patients (46/48 lesions) with significant BL were identified by CTCA. Excluding coronary segments with non-diagnostic image quality (5%), the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of CTCA for detecting significant BL were 96, 99, and 85 and 99%, respectively. In 39 of these 41 patients, CTCA assessment was concordant with the Medina lesion classification on ICA. CONCLUSION: Sixty-four-slice CTCA allows accurate assessment of complex BL.

Chronic total occlusion treatment in post-CABG patients: saphenous vein graft versus native vessel recanalization-long-term follow-up in the drug-eluting stent era.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the postprocedural and long-term clinical outcomes of two groups of patients, all presenting with chronic saphenous vein graft (SVG) occlusion, who underwent either SVG or native vessel reopening. BACKGROUND: Chronic total occlusions (CTO) treatment in patients who underwent previous surgical revascularization is a dilemma and the choice of performing native vessel or SVG recanalization is not always easy. METHODS: Between July 2002 and October 2004, a total of 260 patients were successfully treated for a CTO. Of them, we selected all patients (n = 24) who had previous bypass surgery with graft occlusion. Of this final group, 13 patients underwent a percutaneous graft recanalization while 11 underwent native vessel reopening. RESULTS: Primary end points were in-hospital and 3-year rates of death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and target vessel revascularization. No events occurred in either group during the in-hospital period. Cumulative 3-year event-free survival in the native vessel and SVG group was 81.8% and 83.9% respectively (P = NS). One death and one TVR occurred in each group. CONCLUSION: In selected cases, SVG reopening instead of the native vessel is feasible. In such a high-risk population, drug-eluting stent implantation in both SVG and native CTO lesions is associated with good long-term outcomes.

64-Slice CT coronary angiography in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome.

BACKGROUND: A high diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice CT coronary angiography (CTCA) has been reported in selected patients with stable angina pectoris, but only scant information is available in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS). OBJECTIVES: To study the diagnostic performance of 64-slice CTCA in patients with non-ST elevation ACS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 64-slice CTCA was performed in 104 patients (mean (SD) age 59 (9) years) with non-ST elevation ACS. Two independent, blinded observers assessed all coronary arteries for stenosis, using conventional quantitative angiography as a reference. Coronary lesions with >or=50% luminal narrowing were classified as significant. RESULTS: Conventional coronary angiography demonstrated the absence of significant disease in 15% (16/104) of patients, and the presence of single-vessel disease in 40% (42/104) and multivessel disease in 44% (46/104) of patients. Sensitivity for detecting significant coronary stenoses on a patient-by-patient analysis was 100% (88/88; 95% CI 95 to 100), specificity 75% (12/16; 95% CI 47 to 92), and positive and negative predictive values were 96% (88/92; 95% CI 89 to 99) and 100% (12/12; 95% CI 70 to 100), respectively. CONCLUSION: 64-slice CTCA has a high sensitivity to detect significant coronary stenoses, and is reliable to exclude the presence of significant coronary artery disease in patients who present with a non-ST elevation ACS.

Use of 64-slice CT in symptomatic patients after coronary bypass surgery: evaluation of grafts and coronary arteries.

AIMS: Although previous generations of multislice computed tomography (CT) have demonstrated accurate detection of obstructive bypass graft disease, progression of coronary disease is a more frequent cause for ischaemic symptoms late after bypass graft surgery. We explored the diagnostic performance of 64-slice CT in symptomatic patients after bypass surgery, for the assessment of both grafts and native coronary arteries. METHODS AND RESULTS: The 64-slice CT angiography (Siemens Sensation 64, Germany) was performed in 52 symptomatic patients, 10 +/- 5 years after bypass surgery. Two independent, blinded observers assessed all grafts and coronary arteries for stenosis, using conventional quantitative angiography as a reference. A total of 109 grafts (182 graft segments), 123 distal coronary run-offs, and 116 non-bypassed coronary branches (288 segments) were analysed. Per-segment detection of graft disease yielded a sensitivity of 99% (71/72) and specificity of 96% (106/110). Sensitivity and specificity to detect run-off disease were 89% (8/9) and 93% (106/114), positive predictive value was 50% (8/16). In non-grafted coronary segments, CT detected significant stenosis with a sensitivity and specificity of 97% (62/64) and 86% (192/224). Overestimation occurred more frequently in calcified segments (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The 64-slice CT allows angiographic evaluation of grafts and coronary arteries, although overestimation of coronary obstruction occurs, particularly in the presence of calcified disease.