Unstable angina: good long-term outcome after a complicated early course.

OBJECTIVES: This study was performed to investigate the long-term outcome of patients with unstable angina within subgroups of the Braunwald classification. BACKGROUND: Long-term follow-up studies of patients with unstable angina are rare and date from more than two decades ago. This study was performed to establish the prognosis of different subgroups of patients with unstable angina (Braunwald criteria) during a 7-year follow-up period. METHODS: We registered a well defined group of 417 consecutive patients, admitted to the hospital for suspected unstable angina. The definite diagnosis was unstable angina in 282 patients (68%) and evolving myocardial infarction in 26; in 109 patients (26%), the symptoms were attributed to other or nonspecific causes. Patients with definite unstable angina were subclassified according to the Braunwald classification. Survival, survival without infarction and survival without infarction or intervention were determined for each class. RESULTS: After a median follow-up period of 94 months, the mortality rate in the first year was 6% and 2% to 3% in the following years. The frequency of revascularization was 47% in the first year, and that for myocardial infarction was 11% in the first year and 1% to 3% thereafter. The Braunwald classification appeared to be appropriate for risk stratification in the first year. However, at 7 years the event rates in all classes were similar. In particular, the Braunwald classification had no long-term impact on mortality or infarction rates. However, patients with acute angina at rest or postinfarction angina and patients with extensive anginal treatment had high intervention rates. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this study is the first to demonstrate that despite a complicated course during the first year, current management results in good long-term outcome in patients with unstable angina.

Cardiologists' use of clinical information for management decisions for patients with unstable angina: a policy analysis.

Previous studies of management of unstable angina have revealed substantial differences in management between different hospitals, especially with respect to the use of coronary angiography. Physicians in a hospital with angiography facilities were more inclined to perform angiography than were physicians in hospitals without these facilities, even when differences in patient populations were taken into account. The authors compared the management strategies of 18 cardiologists, working in hospitals with and without angiography facilities, using a series of paper-case summaries, in order to assess the contribution of individual variability between physicians to practice differences. Physicians who worked in a hospital with in-house angiography facilities were more inclined to request angiography in similar case summaries, but the inter-individual variation exceeded the between-hospital variation. The variation in individual policies with respect to the decision to initiate coronary angiography could be associated with differences in weighting clinical information. These results confirm that practice variations may have many causes: variability in patients' characteristics, variations in how physicians react to these, differences in the availability of services, and variability in thresholds for action.

Variation in the use of coronary angiography in patients with unstable angina is related to differences in patient population and availability of angiography facilities, without affecting prognosis.

OBJECTIVES: Examination of the difference in management strategies with respect to coronary angiography in patients with unstable angina pectoris, and the consequences of this difference on prognosis. DESIGN: Prospective registration of consecutive patients admitted to two different hospitals. SETTING: University and a large community hospital in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. SUBJECTS: Patients under 80 years, without recent (< 4 weeks) infarction or recent (< 6 months) coronary revascularization procedure, admitted for chest pain suspected to indicate unstable angina pectoris. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Decision to initiate coronary angiography or to continue on medical treatment. At 6 months the occurrence of death and myocardial infarction was measured. RESULTS: Clinical variables associated with the decision to initiate angiography were young age, male gender, progression of angina, multiple pain episodes and use of beta-blocker or calcium antagonists before admission, abnormal ST-T segment on baseline ECG, recurrent pain in hospital, and ECG changes during pain. These associations did not differ between hospitals. Nevertheless, angiography was performed more often in the presence of angiography facilities (university hospital), independent of the variable case-mix. Survival and infarct-free survival were similar in both hospitals, 96% and 90% respectively. CONCLUSION: The difference in angiography rate for unstable angina can be explained in part by differences in patient population and hospital facilities, but no difference was observed in physicians' assessment of patient characteristics. The observed practice variation did not affect prognosis.

Incidence and follow-up of Braunwald subgroups in unstable angina pectoris.

OBJECTIVES: This study was performed to establish the prognosis of patients with unstable angina within the subgroups of the Braunwald classification. BACKGROUND: Among many classifications of unstable angina, the Braunwald classification is frequently used. However, the incidence and risk for each subgroup in clinical practice have not been established. METHODS: Prospective data for 417 consecutive patients admitted for suspected unstable angina were analyzed. Patients were classified according to Braunwald criteria and followed up for 6 months. Survival, infarct-free survival and infarct-free survival without intervention are reported for each class. RESULTS: After in-hospital observation the final diagnosis was acute myocardial infarction in 26 patients (6%), noncoronary chest pain in 109 (26%) and definite unstable angina in 282 (68%). Recurrence of chest pain was significantly different for the different severity classes (28%, 45% and 64% for classes I [accelerated angina], II [subacute angina at rest] and III [acute angina at rest], respectively) but not for clinical circumstances (49% and 53% for classes B [primary unstable angina] and C [postinfarction unstable angina], respectively). Six-month and infarct-free survival (96% and 88%, respectively) were not significantly different between severity classes but were significantly different (p = 0.01) between classes B (97% and 89%) and C (89% and 80%). Infarct-free survival without intervention was best for class II (72%), intermediate for class I (53%) and worst for class III (35%). In multivariate analysis, elderly age, male gender, hypertension, class C and maximal (intravenous) therapy were independent predictors for death; elderly age and class C for infarct-free survival; and male gender, class III, class C, electrocardiographic changes and maximal therapy were associated with infarct-free survival without intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Braunwald classification is an appropriate instrument to predict outcome. Risk stratification by these criteria provides a tool for patient selection in clinical trials and for evaluation of treatment strategies.