ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Thrombin generation assays (TGAs) assess the overall functionality of the hemostatic system and thereby provide a reflection of the hemostatic capacity of patients with disorders in this system. Currently, four (semi-)automated TGA platforms are available: the Calibrated Automated Thrombogram, Nijmegen Hemostasis Assay, ST Genesia and Ceveron s100. In this study, we compared their performance for detecting patients with congenital single coagulation factor deficiencies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pooled patient samples, healthy control samples and normal pooled plasma were tested on all four platforms, using the available reagents that vary in tissue factor and phospholipid concentrations. The TGA parameters selected for analysis were peak height and thrombin potential. Results were normalized by using the calculated mean of healthy controls and a correction for between-run variation. Outcomes were presented as relative values, with the mean of healthy controls standardized to 100 %. RESULTS: Across all platforms and reagents used, thrombin potentials and peak heights of samples with coagulation factor deficiencies were lower than those of healthy controls. Reagents designed for bleeding tendencies yielded the lowest values on all platforms (relative median peak height 19-32 %, relative median thrombin potential 19-45 %). Samples representing more severe coagulation factor deficiencies generally exhibited lower relative peak heights and thrombin potentials. CONCLUSIONS: Thrombin generation assays prove effective in differentiating single coagulation factor deficient samples from healthy controls, with modest discrepancies observed between the platforms. Reagents designed for assessing bleeding tendencies, featuring the lowest tissue factor and phospholipid concentrations, emerged as the most suitable option for detecting coagulation factor deficiencies.
ABSTRACT
The diagnostic work-up of patients referred to the haematologist for bleeding evaluation is performed in a stepwise way: bleeding history and results of screening laboratory tests guide further diagnostic evaluation. This can be ineffective, time-consuming and burdensome for patients. To improve this strategy, the initial laboratory investigation can be extended. In a model-based approach, effectiveness and costs of a conventional stepwise versus a newly proposed all-in-one diagnostic approach for bleeding evaluation were evaluated and compared, using data from an observational patient cohort study, including adult patients referred for bleeding evaluation. In the all-in-one approach, specialized platelet function tests, coagulation factors, and fibrinolysis tests were included in the initial investigation. Final diagnosis, hospital resource use and costs and patient burden were compared. A total of 150 patients were included. Compared to the stepwise approach, in the all-in-one approach, 19 additional patients reached a diagnosis and patient burden was lower, but total costs per patient were higher [359, 95% bootstrapped confidence interval (BCI) 283-518, p = 0.001]. For bleeding evaluation of patients referred to the haematologist, an all-in-one diagnostic approach has a higher diagnostic yield and reduces patient burden, at a higher cost. This raises the question what costs justify the diagnosis of a bleeding disorder and a less burdensome diagnostic strategy.
