Characterization of the pharmacodynamic interaction between parent drug and active metabolite in vivo: midazolam and alpha-OH-midazolam.

The pharmacodynamic interaction between midazolam and its active metabolite alpha-OH-midazolam was investigated to evaluate whether estimates of relevant pharmacodynamic parameters are possible after administration of a mixture of the two. Rats were administered 10 mg/kg of midazolam, 15 mg/kg of alpha-OH-midazolam, or a combination of 3.6 mg/kg of midazolam and 35 mg/kg of alpha-OH-midazolam. Increase in the 11.5- to 30-Hz frequency band of the electroencephalogram was used as the pharmacodynamic endpoint. The pharmacodynamics of midazolam and alpha-OH-midazolam after combined administration were first analyzed according to an empirical and a competitive interaction model to evaluate each model's capability in retrieving the pharmacodynamic estimates of both compounds. Both models failed to accurately estimate the true pharmacodynamic estimates of midazolam and alpha-OH-midazolam. The pharmacodynamic interaction was subsequently analyzed according to a new mechanism-based model. This approach is based on classical receptor theory and allows estimation of the in vivo estimated receptor affinity and intrinsic in vivo drug efficacy. The relationship between stimulus and effect is characterized by a monotonically increasing function f, which is assumed to be identical for midazolam and alpha-OH-midazolam. The pharmacodynamic interaction is characterized by the classical equation for the competition between two substrates for a common receptor site. This mechanism-based interaction model was able to estimate the pharmacodynamic parameters of both midazolam and alpha-OH-midazolam with high accuracy. It is concluded that pharmacodynamic parameters of single drugs can be estimated after a combined administration when a mechanistically valid interaction model is applied.

Integrated pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of Ro 48-6791, a new benzodiazepine, in comparison with midazolam during first administration to healthy male subjects.

AIMS: This study was performed to investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ascending doses of Ro 48-6791, compared with midazolam, in healthy subjects during first administration to man studies. METHODS: The study was double-blind and five-way crossover with treatment on 5 consecutive days (three ascending doses, placebo, fixed midazolam dose) in two sequential groups of five healthy male subjects. Ro 48-6791 was administered as a slow i.v. infusion in doses of 0.1-0.3-1 mg in the first group, and 1-2-3 mg in the second. Midazolam was infused at 0.1 mg kg(-1). The infusions were stopped after 20 min or if sedation became too strong for proper performance of the tests. Consequently, infusion rates (mg min(-1)) differed considerably among doses. Blood samples were collected frequently for pharmacokinetic determinations (two-compartment model). Pharmacodynamics were assessed by recording of saccadic eye movements (saccadic peak velocity) and electroencephalography (beta-power). These parameters were used for pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling. RESULTS: Ro 48-6791 and midazolam were both well tolerated. Most clinical events were dose-dependent central depressant effects. The volume of distribution (V(SS)) and plasma clearance of Ro 48-6791 were on average markedly larger than those of midazolam (171 +/- 65 vs 41 +/- 10 l and 2.2 +/- 0.9 vs 0.42 +/- 0.11 l min(-1), respectively). The doses of Ro 48-6791 leading to loss of saccadic eye movements were on average four times lower than that of midazolam. The corresponding predicted effect compartment concentrations differed by a factor of about six. Doses of Ro 48-6791 and midazolam eliciting similar maximum effects had a comparable onset and duration of action for saccadic peak velocity. Midazolam caused a significantly larger (33%, range 17, 55%) increase in beta-power than Ro 48-6791 at the highest administered dose. Ro 48-6792, a metabolite of Ro 48-6791, showed a considerably longer half-life than the parent compound. Although there were no indications of a discernable effect of Ro 48-6792 in the present study, the effects of possible accumulation during prolonged administration should be investigated further. CONCLUSIONS: This first study with Ro 48-6791 in humans has shown that this benzodiazepine is approximately four to six times as potent as midazolam, but has a comparable onset and duration of action.

Solving inconsistencies in the analysis of receptor-ligand interactions.

According to the occupation model, the observed sigmoidicity in receptor-binding studies frequently yields non-integer values for the number of molecules that bind per receptor, which may suggest inconsistencies of the model. Here, Bertil Tuk and Michael van Oostenbruggen re-examine the derivation of the model and pinpoint the origin of the observed inconsistencies, thereby demonstrating that these inconsistencies may lead to substantial error in estimates of receptor affinity, number of molecules that bind per receptor and cooperativity. A reformulated model allows more information to be derived from receptor-binding experiments, yielding integer estimates of the number of molecules that bind per receptor and quantitatively estimating the degree of cooperativity.