Impact of the duration of infection on the activity of ceftazidime, gentamicin and ciprofloxacin in Klebsiella pneumoniae pneumonia and septicemia in leukopenic rats.

An experimental Klebsiella pneumoniae pneumonia and septicemia in leukopenic rats was used to study the impact of the duration of infection on the bactericidal activity of ceftazidime, gentamicin and ciprofloxacin. It appeared that the number of bacteria persisting after a single intravenous injection progressively increased with delay of antibiotic administration up to 3 h after bacterial inoculation with each of the drugs tested. This effect was most pronounced for ciprofloxacin. An inoculum effect could not explain this decrease in bacterial killing. It was also observed that a single injection with a particular dose of each of the respective drugs did not kill all the Klebsiella pneumoniae organisms in the lung. Persisting bacteria did not represent a preexisting less susceptible subpopulation selected after antibiotic administration. In further experiments the impact of delay of the start of treatment on the efficacy of ceftazidime or ciprofloxacin after administration for a period of four days with intramuscular injections at 6 h intervals was investigated. Treatment was started at 5, 12 or 24 h after bacterial inoculation. The therapeutic efficacy of both drugs decreased with the increase of duration of infection, which may be at least in part due to the progressive number of bacteria persisting after antibiotic administration. These data underline the need to start antimicrobial treatment as soon as possible.

Impact of the dosage schedule on the efficacy of ceftazidime, gentamicin and ciprofloxacin in Klebsiella pneumoniae pneumonia and septicemia in leukopenic rats.

The impact of the dosage schedule on the therapeutic efficacy of antibiotics was investigated in experimental Klebsiella pneumoniae pneumonia and septicemia in leukopenic rats. The daily doses (mg/kg) that protected 50% of the animals from death, when calculated for administration at 6 h intervals or by continuous infusion, were as follows: ceftazidime 24.4 and 1.5 (p less than 0.001), gentamicin 2.8 and 3.8 (p greater than 0.05), and ciprofloxacin 3.3 and 6.5 (p less than 0.05), respectively. This correlates with the observation that ceftazidime killed Klebsiella pneumoniae slowly but constantly, and relatively independently of concentration, whereas killing by gentamicin or ciprofloxacin was rapid, and markedly dependent on antibiotic concentration. Exposure of bacteria for 1 h to concentrations of fivefold the MBC did not give rise to a postantibiotic effect for any of the drugs. In our model ceftazidime was far more effective when given continuously than when administered at 6 h intervals. On the other hand, the activity of gentamicin was not influenced by the mode of administration, whereas ciprofloxacin was slightly more effective when given intermittently. However, to avoid misleading conclusions regarding the use of antibiotics in humans, the pharmacokinetic differences between rats and man must be considered when interpreting these results.

Influence of dose frequency on the therapeutic efficacies of ciprofloxacin and ceftazidime in experimental Klebsiella pneumoniae pneumonia and septicemia in relation to their bactericidal activities in vitro.

The antibacterial activities of ciprofloxacin versus ceftazidime against Klebsiella pneumoniae in vitro and in vivo were compared. Although there was only a minor difference in MBC values between both drugs ciprofloxacin demonstrated a high and dose-dependent bacterial killing rate in vitro and in lungs of leukopenic rats in contrast to the more time-dependent bactericidal activity of ceftazidime. After treatment of a K.pneumoniae pneumonia and septicemia the efficacy of ciprofloxacin was only slightly influenced by the mode of administration, either at 6-h intervals or continuously, whereas ceftazidime was far more effective after continuous administration. This resulted in a superior efficacy of ciprofloxacin after intermittent treatment as compared to ceftazidime, whereas ceftazidime was more effective after continuous administration as compared to ciprofloxacin. Also ciprofloxacin proved to be bactericidal against bacteria that were not actively growing, both in vitro and in vivo, whereas ceftazidime was not.

Comparative activities of ciprofloxacin and ceftazidime against Klebsiella pneumoniae in vitro and in experimental pneumonia in leukopenic rats.

The antibacterial activities of ciprofloxacin and ceftazidime against Klebsiella pneumoniae in vitro and in vivo were compared. Although there was only a minor difference between the MBCs of both drugs, the bacterial killing rate of ciprofloxacin in vitro was very fast in comparison with that of ceftazidime. Similarly, the intravenous administration of ciprofloxacin at 1 h after bacterial inoculation resulted in effective bacterial killing in the lungs of leukopenic rats. This killing was dose dependent, in contrast to the dose-independent bactericidal effect of ceftazidime. The high antibacterial activity of ciprofloxacin in the lungs as compared with that of ceftazidime was also reflected in its therapeutic efficacy in K. pneumoniae pneumonia and septicemia in leukopenic rats when these infections were treated at 6-h intervals over 4 days, starting at 5 h after bacterial inoculation. Concentrations of ciprofloxacin and ceftazidime in lung tissue were not significantly different. Regarding the antibacterial activity of both drugs against K. pneumoniae in relation to the bacterial growth rate in vitro and in the lungs of leukopenic rats, ciprofloxacin killed K. pneumoniae organisms that were not actively growing, whereas ceftazidime did not. In addition, it was demonstrated that when the intravenous administration of antibiotic was delayed from 1 h up to 24 h after bacterial inoculation, ceftazidime lost its antibacterial activity in the lungs and blood of leukopenic rats, whereas ciprofloxacin was still very effective. These data suggest that the capacity of an antibiotic to kill bacteria at a slow growth rate may be relevant for its therapeutic effect in established infections, in which slowly growing bacteria form a substantial part of the total bacterial population.

Continuous versus intermittent administration of ceftazidime in experimental Klebsiella pneumoniae pneumonia in normal and leukopenic rats.

Experimental Klebsiella pneumoniae pneumonia was used to study the influence of cyclophosphamide-induced leukopenia on the relative therapeutic efficacy of continuous and intermittent (6-h intervals) administration of ceftazidime. The antimicrobial response was evaluated with respect to the calculated daily dose that protected 50% of the animals from death (PD50) until 16 days after the termination of a 4-day treatment. When ceftazidime was administered intermittently to leukopenic rats, the PD50 was 24.37 mg/kg per day, 70 times (P less than 0.001) the PD50 of 0.35 mg/kg per day for normal rats. Continuous administration of ceftazidime to leukopenic rats resulted in a PD50 of 1.52 mg/kg per day, four times (P less than 0.001) the PD50 of 0.36 mg/kg per day for normal rats. Continuous administration of ceftazidime in daily doses that protected 100% of normal and leukopenic rats from death resulted in serum levels of 0.06 and 0.38 micrograms/ml, respectively, whereas the MIC for the infecting K. pneumoniae strain was 0.2 micrograms of ceftazidime per ml. The effect of the duration of ceftazidime treatment by continuous infusion on the therapeutic efficacy in relation to the persistence of leukopenia was then investigated in leukopenic rats. The administration of 3.75 mg of ceftazidime/kg per day for 4 days protected all leukopenic rats from death, provided the circulating leukocytes returned at the end of antibiotic treatment. When leukopenia persisted for 8 days this ceftazidime treatment schedule resulted in the mortality of rats (P less than 0.05). However, when ceftazidime treatment was continued for 8 days, until the return of the leukocytes, there was no significant mortality (P greater than 0.05).

Tolerance percentage as a criterion for the detection of tolerant Staphylococcus aureus strains.

In this study, the degree of tolerance was determined in several populations of Staphylococcus aureus isolates. The degree of tolerance of a staphylococcal strain can be established in a reproducible way by exposing the strain to increasing concentrations of a beta-lactam antibiotic and determining the number of surviving bacteria at each concentration. The number of surviving bacteria was expressed as a fraction of the initial inoculum. By this technique, it appears that for each strain the value of the surviving fraction stabilized above a certain concentration of the antibiotic. This value was called the tolerance percentage of the strain. In 64 S. aureus strains isolated from blood cultures in 1982, the tolerance percentages, after exposure to methicillin, varied from less than or equal to 0.1 to 6; 28% of the strains showed a tolerance percentage of less than or equal to 0.1, and 12.5% showed a tolerance percentage of greater than or equal to 2. Similar tolerance percentages were found with cloxacillin, nafcillin, cephalothin, and penicillin. Strains with a tolerance percentage of greater than or equal to 2 showed slow killing and lysis in the presence of a high methicillin concentration. A tolerance percentage of 2 appeared to be the breakpoint between susceptible and tolerant strains. Older collections of S. aureus strains, dating from the years 1951 to 1953 and 1957 to 1958, also included strains with a survival percentage of greater than or equal to 2, thus indicating that tolerance of S. aureus to beta-lactam antibiotics is not a new phenomenon.