DOMINO, doxycycline 40 mg vs. minocycline 100 mg in the treatment of rosacea: a randomized, single-blinded, noninferiority trial, comparing efficacy and safety.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of evidence for minocycline in the treatment of rosacea. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of doxycycline 40 mg vs. minocycline 100 mg in papulopustular rosacea. METHODS: In this randomized, single-centre, 1 : 1 allocation, assessor-blinded, noninferiority trial, patients with mild-to-severe papulopustular rosacea were randomly allocated to either oral doxycycline 40 mg or minocycline 100 mg for a 16-week period with 12 weeks of follow-up. Our primary outcomes were the change in lesion count and change in patient's health-related quality of life (using RosaQoL). Intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of the 80 patients randomized (40 minocycline, 40 doxycycline), 71 were treated for 16 weeks. Sixty-eight patients completed the study. At week 16, the median change in lesion count was comparable in both groups: doxycycline vs. minocycline, respectively 13 vs. 14 fewer lesions. The RosaQoL scores were decreased for both doxycycline and minocycline, respectively by 0·62 and 0·86. Secondary outcomes were comparable except for Investigator's Global Assessment success, which was seen significantly more often in the minocycline group than in the doxycycline group (60% vs. 18%, P < 0·001). At week 28, outcomes were comparable, except for RosaQoL scores and PaGA, which were significantly different in favour of minocycline (P = 0·005 and P = 0·043, respectively), and fewer relapses were recorded in the minocycline group than in the doxycycline group (7% and 48%, respectively; P < 0·001). No serious adverse reactions were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Minocycline 100 mg is noninferior to doxycycline 40 mg in efficacy over a 16- week treatment period. At follow-up, RosaQoL and PaGA were statistically significantly more improved in the minocycline group than in the doxycycline group, and minocycline 100 mg gives longer remission. In this study there was no significant difference in safety between these treatments; however, based on previous literature minocycline has a lower risk-to-benefit ratio than doxycycline. Minocycline 100 mg may be a good alternative treatment for those patients who, for any reason, are unable or unwilling to take doxycycline 40 mg.

Mild to moderate hidradenitis suppurativa treated with local excision and primary closure.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic skin disease with a great impact on quality of life. Treatment with antibiotics or anti-inflammatory drugs, such as prednisone or TNF-alpha-inhibitors usually achieves only temporary improvement. Surgical intervention is considered as the only curative treatment for recurrent lesions. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and patient satisfaction of local excision followed by primary closure. METHODS: Between 2005 and 2010, 92 local excisions with primary closure were performed in 57 patients with mild to moderate HS. All patients were treated on an outpatient basis, under local anaesthesia. Local excision was defined as complete excision of the affected tissue, beyond the borders of activity, leaving clear margins. The medical records were reviewed retrospectively in 2010. The final outcome of the procedure, cosmetic appearance and patient satisfaction was measured using a questionnaire. RESULTS: Successful treatment, without recurrence, was accomplished in 66% of the cases. The intervention was generally well tolerated: 84% of the patients stated that they would undergo the same surgical procedure again if necessary, and 89% would recommend the procedure to other patients. CONCLUSION: Local excision followed by primary closure is a valuable treatment for patients with mild to moderate HS (Hurly stage I & II), with low morbidity and a high patient satisfaction rate.

New-onset polyarthritis during successful treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa with infliximab.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) can be associated with several forms of arthritis, usually considered as reactive arthritis. A new observation is that some patients with HS develop arthritis after treatment with infliximab (antitumour necrosis factor-α). OBJECTIVES: A retrospective study was performed to establish the frequency and clinical presentation of new-onset arthritis during infliximab treatment. METHODS: Between 2005 and 2009, 27 individuals with severe HS were treated with infliximab and followed up closely. Laboratory parameters and side-effects were recorded. The frequency of arthritis was compared with control groups consisting of 227 patients with HS not treated with any biological, 22 patients with HS treated with adalimumab and 28 patients with psoriasis treated with infliximab, in the same period at the same clinic. RESULTS: Five of the 27 patients with HS (18%) treated with infliximab developed an acute and painful polyarthritis during treatment. The arthritis occurred on average after 12 months of treatment, was not clearly associated with anti-infliximab antibodies and resolved on average after 4 months. Interestingly, none of the patients had suffered from arthritis before despite the long duration of HS and all showed a good skin response to infliximab. Moreover, arthritis was not observed in any of the control groups. Compared with the adalimumab group and the psoriasis group, odds ratios of 7·241 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1·15-45·6] and 9·025 (95% CI 1·45-55·82) were calculated. CONCLUSIONS: The five cases described in this article suggest that infliximab treatment in HS can induce a transient but severe polyarthritis. The underlying mechanisms remain to be investigated further.