Endochondral Bone Regeneration by Non-autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Mimicking endochondral bone formation is a promising strategy for bone regeneration. To become a successful therapy, the cell source is a crucial translational aspect. Typically, autologous cells are used. The use of non-autologous mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) represents an interesting alternative. Nevertheless, non-autologous, differentiated MSCs may trigger an undesired immune response, hampering bone regeneration. The aim of this study was to unravel the influence of the immune response on endochondral bone regeneration, when using xenogeneic (human) or allogeneic (Dark Agouti) MSCs. To this end, chondrogenically differentiated MSCs embedded in a collagen carrier were implanted in critical size femoral defects of immunocompetent Brown Norway rats. Control groups were included with syngeneic/autologous (Brown Norway) MSCs or a cell-free carrier. The amount of neo-bone formation was proportional to the degree of host-donor relatedness, as no full bridging of the defect was observed in the xenogeneic group whereas 2/8 and 7/7 bridges occurred in the allogeneic and the syngeneic group, respectively. One week post-implantation, the xenogeneic grafts were invaded by pro-inflammatory macrophages, T lymphocytes, which persisted after 12 weeks, and anti-human antibodies were developed. The immune response toward the allogeneic graft was comparable to the one evoked by the syngeneic implants, aside from an increased production of alloantibodies, which might be responsible for the more heterogeneous bone formation. Our results demonstrate for the first time the feasibility of using non-autologous MSC-derived chondrocytes to elicit endochondral bone regeneration in vivo. Nevertheless, the pronounced immune response and the limited bone formation observed in the xenogeneic group undermine the clinical relevance of this group. On the contrary, although further research on how to achieve robust bone formation with allogeneic cells is needed, they may represent an alternative to autologous transplantation.

A composite hydrogel-3D printed thermoplast osteochondral anchor as example for a zonal approach to cartilage repair: in vivo performance in a long-term equine model.

Recent research has been focusing on the generation of living personalized osteochondral constructs for joint repair. Native articular cartilage has a zonal structure, which is not reflected in current constructs and which may be a cause of the frequent failure of these repair attempts. Therefore, we investigated the performance of a composite implant that further reflects the zonal distribution of cellular component both in vitro and in vivo in a long-term equine model. Constructs constituted of a 3D-printed poly(ϵ-caprolactone) (PCL) bone anchor from which reinforcing fibers protruded into the chondral part of the construct over which two layers of a thiol-ene cross-linkable hyaluronic acid/poly(glycidol) hybrid hydrogel (HA-SH/P(AGE-co-G)) were fabricated. The top layer contained Articular Cartilage Progenitor Cells (ACPCs) derived from the superficial layer of native cartilage tissue, the bottom layer contained mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs). The chondral part of control constructs were homogeneously filled with MSCs. After six months in vivo, microtomography revealed significant bone growth into the anchor. Histologically, there was only limited production of cartilage-like tissue (despite persistency of hydrogel) both in zonal and non-zonal constructs. There were no differences in histological scoring; however, the repair tissue was significantly stiffer in defects repaired with zonal constructs. The sub-optimal quality of the repair tissue may be related to several factors, including early loss of implanted cells, or inappropriate degradation rate of the hydrogel. Nonetheless, this approach may be promising and research into further tailoring of biomaterials and of construct characteristics seems warranted.

Effects of body mass on microstructural features of the osteochondral unit: A comparative analysis of 37 mammalian species.

Since Galileo's days the effect of size on the anatomical characteristics of the structural elements of the body has been a subject of interest. However, the effects of scaling at tissue level have received little interest and virtually no data exist on the subject with respect to the osteochondral unit in the joint, despite this being one of the most lesion-prone and clinically relevant parts of the musculoskeletal system. Imaging techniques, including Fourier transform infrared imaging, polarized light microscopy and micro computed tomography, were combined to study the response to increasing body mass of the osteochondral unit. We analyzed the effect of scaling on structural characteristics of articular cartilage, subchondral plate and the supporting trabecular bone, across a wide range of mammals at microscopic level. We demonstrated that, while total cartilage thickness scales to body mass in a negative allometric fashion, thickness of different cartilage layers did not. Cartilage tissue layers were found to adapt to increasing loads principally in the deep zone with the superficial layers becoming relatively thinner. Subchondral plate thickness was found to have no correlation to body mass, nor did bone volume fraction. The underlying trabecular bone was found to have thicker trabeculae (r=0.75, p<0.001), as expected since this structure carries most loads and plays a role in force mitigation. The results of this study suggest that the osteochondral tissue structure has remained remarkably preserved across mammalian species during evolution, and that in particular, the trabecular bone carries the adaptation to the increasing body mass.

Hyaluronic Acid-Based Hydrogel Coating Does Not Affect Bone Apposition at the Implant Surface in a Rabbit Model.

BACKGROUND: Uncemented orthopaedic implants rely on the bone-implant interface to provide stability, therefore it is essential that a coating does not interfere with the bone-forming processes occurring at the implant interface. In addition, local application of high concentrations of antibiotics for prophylaxis or treatment of infection may be toxic for osteoblasts and could impair bone growth. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In this animal study, we investigated the effect of a commercially available hydrogel, either unloaded or loaded with 2% vancomycin. We asked, does unloaded hydrogel or hydrogel with vancomycin (1) interfere with bone apposition and timing of bone deposition near the implant surface; and (2) induce a local or systemic inflammatory reaction as determined by inflammation around the implant and hematologic parameters. METHODS: In 18 New Zealand White rabbits, an uncoated titanium rod (n = 6), a rod coated with unloaded hydrogel (n = 6), or a rod coated with 2% vancomycin-loaded hydrogel (n = 6) was implanted in the intramedullary canal of the left tibia. After 28 days, the bone volume fraction near the implant was measured with microCT analysis, inflammation was semiquantitatively scored on histologic sections, and timing of bone apposition was followed by semiquantitative scoring of fluorochrome incorporation on histologic sections. Two observers, blinded to the treatment, scored the sections and reconciled their scores if there was a disagreement. The hematologic inflammatory reaction was analyzed by measuring total and differential leukocyte counts and erythrocyte sedimentation rates in blood. With group sizes of six animals per group, we had 79% power to detect a difference of 25% in histologic scoring for infection and inflammation. RESULTS: No differences were found in the amount of bone apposition near the implant in the No Gel group (48.65% ± 14.95%) compared with the Gel group (59.97% ± 5.02%; mean difference [MD], 11.32%; 95% CI, -3.89% to 26.53%; p = 0.16) or for the Van2 group (56.12% ± 10.06%; MD, 7.46; 95% CI, -7.75 to 22.67; p = 0.40), with the numbers available. In addition, the scores for timing of bone apposition did not differ between the No Gel group (0.50 ± 0.55) compared with the Gel group (0.33 ± 0.52; MD, -0.17; 95% CI, -0.86 to 0.53; p = 0.78) or the Van2 group (0.83 ± 0.41; MD, 0.33; 95% CI, -0.36 to 1.03; p = 0.42). Furthermore, we detected no differences in the histopathology scores for inflammation in the No Gel group (2.33 ± 1.67) compared with the Gel group (3.17 ± 1.59; MD, 0.83; 95% CI, -0.59 to 2.26; p = 0.31) or to the Van2 group (2.5 ± 1.24; MD, 0.17; 95% CI, -1.26 to 1.59; p = 0.95). Moreover, no differences in total leukocyte count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and neutrophil, monocyte, eosinophil, basophil, and lymphocyte counts were present between the No Gel or Van2 groups compared with the Gel control group, with the numbers available. CONCLUSION: The hydrogel coated on titanium implants, unloaded or loaded with 2% vancomycin, had no effect on the volume or timing of bone apposition near the implant, and did not induce an inflammatory reaction in vivo, with the numbers available. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Antibiotic-loaded hydrogel may prove to be a valuable option to protect orthopaedic implants from bacterial colonization. Future clinical safety studies will need to provide more evidence that this product does not impair bone formation near the implant and prove the safety of this product.

One-stage focal cartilage defect treatment with bone marrow mononuclear cells and chondrocytes leads to better macroscopic cartilage regeneration compared to microfracture in goats.

OBJECTIVE: The combination of chondrocytes and mononuclear fraction (MNF) cells might solve the expansion induced dedifferentiation problem of reimplanted cells in autologous chondrocytes implantation as sufficient cells would be available for direct, one-stage, implantation. Earlier in vitro work already showed a positive stimulation of cartilage specific matrix production when chondrocytes and MNF cells were combined. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate cartilage regeneration using a one-stage procedure combining MNF cells and primary chondrocytes for the treatment of focal cartilage lesions in goats compared to microfracture treatment. DESIGN: Freshly created focal cartilage defects were treated with either a combination of chondrocytes and MNF cells embedded in fibrin glue or microfracture treatment. After 6 months follow-up local regeneration as well as the general joint cartilage health were evaluated using validated scores and biochemical assays. RESULTS: Macroscopic (P = 0.015) scores for the cartilage surface at the treated defect were, after 6 months, significantly higher for the chondrocyteMNF treatment compared to microfracture-treated defects, but microscopic scores were not (P = 0.067). The articulating cartilage showed more (P = 0.005) degeneration following microfracture treatment compared to chondrocyteMNF treatment. Biochemical glycosaminoglycans (GAG) evaluation did not reveal differences between the treatments. Both treatments had resulted in a slight to moderate cartilage degeneration at other locations in the joint. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, treatment of focal articular cartilage lesions in goats using a combination of MNF cells from bone marrow and unexpanded chondrocytes leads to better macroscopic regeneration compared to microfracture, however needs further fine-tuning to decrease the negative influence on other joint compartments.

Cartilage degeneration in the goat knee caused by treating localized cartilage defects with metal implants.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the current study was to investigate the feasibility of applying defect-size femoral implants for the treatment of localized cartilage defects in a 1-year follow-up model. METHODS: In 13 goats, a medial femoral condyle defect was created in both knees. Defects were randomly treated by immediate placement of an oxidized zirconium (OxZr) (n=9) or cobalt-chromium (CoCr) implant (n=9) or left untreated (n=8). Six un-operated knee joints served as a control. Animals were sacrificed at 52 weeks. Joints were evaluated macroscopically. Cartilage quality was analyzed macroscopically and microscopically and cartilage repair of untreated defects was scored microscopically. Glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content, release and synthesis were measured in tissue and medium. Implant osseointegration was measured by automated histomorphometry. RESULTS: Cartilage repair score of the defects was 13.3+/-3.0 out of 24 points (0=no repair, 24=maximal repair). Articular evaluation scores decreased (indicative of degeneration) in untreated defects and in defects treated with either implant (P<0.05). Macroscopical, microscopical and biochemical analysis showed that the presence of untreated defects and the implants caused considerable degeneration of medial tibial plateau, and to a lesser extent of the lateral compartment. Mean bone-implant contact was extensive and not different between materials (39.5+/-28.1% for OxZr and 42.3+/-31.5% for CoCr) (P=0.873). CONCLUSIONS: Considerable cartilage degeneration was induced in the articulating cartilage of the medial tibial plateau 1 year after creating an osteochondral defect in the medial femoral condyle. Treating this defect with a small metal implant, made of either OxZr or CoCr, could not prevent this degeneration. Further optimization of defect-size implants and their placement is required to make this the therapy of choice for the treatment of local cartilage defects.

Articular cartilage degeneration following the treatment of focal cartilage defects with ceramic metal implants and compared with microfracture.

BACKGROUND: Localized cartilage defects are frequently associated with joint pain, reduced function, and a predisposition to the development of osteoarthritis. The purposes of the current study were to investigate the feasibility of the application of defect-sized femoral implants for the treatment of localized cartilage defects and to compare this treatment, in terms of joint degeneration, with the use of microfracture in a goat model of established cartilage defects. METHODS: In nine Dutch milk goats, a defect in the medial femoral condyle was created in both knees. After ten weeks, the knees were randomly treated by microfracture or by placement of an oxidized zirconium implant. At twenty-six weeks after surgery, the animals were killed. The joints were evaluated macroscopically. Implant osseointegration was measured by automated histomorphometry, and cartilage repair (after microfracture) was scored histologically. Cartilage quality was analyzed macroscopically and histologically. Glycosaminoglycan content and release were measured by alcian blue assay, and the synthesis and release of newly formed glycosaminoglycans were measured by liquid scintillation analysis of the incorporation of 35SO4(2-) in tissue and medium. RESULTS: The mean bone-implant contact (and standard error) was appropriate (14.6%+/-5.4%), and the amount of bone surrounding the implant was extensive (mean, 40.3%+/-4.0%). The healing of the microfracture-treated defects was extensive, although not complete (mean, 18.38+/-0.43 points of a maximum possible score of 24 points). The macroscopic cartilage evaluation did not show any significant differences between the treatments. On histologic evaluation, the cartilage of the medial tibial plateau articulating directly against the treated defects demonstrated significantly more degeneration in the microfracture-treated knees than in the implant-treated knees (p<0.05). This was in accordance with a significantly higher glycosaminoglycan content, higher synthetic activity, and decreased glycosaminoglycan release of the medial tibial plateau cartilage of the implant-treated knees (p<0.05 for all). On histological analysis, degeneration was also found in the cartilage of the lateral tibial plateau and condyle, but no significant difference was found between the treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Both microfracture and the use of implants as a treatment for established localized cartilage defects in the medial femoral condyle caused considerable (p < 0.05) degeneration of the directly articulating cartilage as well as in more remote sites in the knee. However, in the medial tibial plateau, the metal implants caused less damage than the microfracture technique.

Reliability, reproducibility and variability of the traditional Histologic/Histochemical Grading System vs the new OARSI Osteoarthritis Cartilage Histopathology Assessment System.

OBJECTIVE: For many years, the Histologic/Histochemical Grading System (HHGS) for osteoarthritis monitoring has been used as a histological scoring system for the quality of cartilage. There are, however, some limitations using this grading system. The goal of the investigation presented in this paper was to examine the hypothesized advantage of the recently introduced Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) Cartilage Histopathology Assessment System (OOCHAS) as compared to the most frequently used HHGS by means of reliability, reproducibility, and variability evaluation as well as the correlation analysis between the two systems in goat knee articular cartilage. METHODS: Nine hundred and thirty-six sections of Dutch Milk goat articular knee cartilage were scored using light microscopy. Three observers applied the HHGS for all sections and subsequently, the OOCHAS. The same scoring procedure was repeated after a minimum interval of 1 week. For each system the reliability, reproducibility and variability as well as the correlation between both systems were determined. RESULTS: The reliability of the OOCHAS was higher as compared to the HHGS. Both the HHGS as well the OOCHAS have an excellent intra- and inter-observer reproducibility and variability and a good positive correlation between the scores. CONCLUSIONS: Although the HHGS has proven to be an excellent tool for histological scoring of cartilage quality, we recommend the OOCHAS as the premium choice while stressing the importance of further research investigating the correlation of the histological results to macroscopic and biochemical parameters.

Articular damage caused by metal plugs in a rabbit model for treatment of localized cartilage defects.

OBJECTIVE: Currently, the surgical treatment of localized cartilage defects has limitations. Alternatively, localized cartilage defects may be treated with small biocompatible metal cartilage tacks. Our purpose was to investigate the applicability of defect-size femoral implants. Different bearing materials, cobalt-chromium (CoCr) and oxidized zirconium (OxZr), were tested to evaluate the effect on opposing cartilage quality and osseointegration at different insertion depths. METHODS: In 18 adult female New Zealand White rabbits, a medial femoral condyle defect was filled with either an OxZr or a CoCr implant (Ø articulating surface 3.5 mm; fixating pin of 9.1 mm length), placed flush, 1mm deep or 1mm protruding with respect to the level of the surrounding cartilage. Animals were sacrificed after 4 weeks. Tibial cartilage quality was scored microscopically and osseointegration measured by automated histomorphometry. RESULTS: Considerable articulating cartilage erosion was found in all conditions. Tibial cartilage quality was least compromised when both implants were placed flush compared to deep (P=0.01) or protruding position (P=0.004) and was better for OxZr compared to CoCr (P=0.011) when left protruding, while no differences were found when placed deep of flush. Most bone formation around the fixating pin was observed in a protruding position (P=0.01). In deep position, more bone-implant contact was observed with CoCr compared to OxZr (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: OxZr and CoCr implants showed good osseointegration when used as a localized cartilage defect treatment in the rabbit knee; however, opposite cartilage damage was observed in all cases. Placement flush to the surrounding cartilage seems essential and when left protruding OxZr may be less erosive. In conclusion, caution is warranted using small metal implants for the treatment of localized cartilage in the human patient.

Altered in vitro chondrogenic properties of chondrocytes harvested from unaffected cartilage in osteoarthritic joints.

OBJECTIVE: In vitro models of chondrogenesis often depart from chondrocytes harvested from less-affected areas of osteoarthritic joints. However, there are indications that these chondrocytes are phenotypically different from chondrocytes from healthy joints and thus might differ in their capacity to generate hyaline cartilage. The goal of this study was to compare the chondrogenic capacity of chondrocytes from healthy and OA joints. DESIGN: Chondrocytes isolated from nine healthy and nine OA knee joints were expanded in monolayer for two passages. Chondrocytes from passages 1 and 2 were analyzed for expression of (de)differentiation and hypertrophy markers and were seeded at passage 2 on collagen-coated filters for redifferentiation culture to study cartilage matrix formation. RESULTS: The collagen II/I mRNA ratio, reflecting differentiation, decreased from passage 1 to 2 in both chondrocytes from OA joints and chondrocytes from healthy joints (P<0.05), without a significant difference between the two donor types. At passage 1, levels of the cartilage transcription factors Sox-5, Sox-6 and Sox-9 appeared to be higher in chondrocytes from OA joints (n.s.), but this was not seen at passage 2. However, a clear difference was observed in collagen type X expression, which was high in chondrocytes from OA joints at both passages, while undetectable in chondrocytes from healthy joints (P<0.01). Tissue generated by chondrocytes from healthy joints redifferentiated for 28 days, showed a significantly better morphology, as assessed by histological scoring (P<0.01) and higher proteoglycan content (P<0.05), compared to chondrocytes from OA joints. Matrix turnover parameters, i.e., proteoglycan synthesis and degradation rate, were not significantly affected by donor tissue origin. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that clear differences between chondrocytes from healthy and OA joints exist and that these are not completely abolished during the process of de- and redifferentiation. Therefore, in vitro cartilage regeneration models, which use chondrocytes from OA joints, should be interpreted with care.

Increased coronary perfusion augments cardiac contractility in the rat through stretch-activated ion channels.

The role of stretch-activated ion channels (SACs) in coronary perfusion-induced increase in cardiac contractility was investigated in isolated isometrically contracting perfused papillary muscles from Wistar rats. A brief increase in perfusion pressure (3-4 s, perfusion pulse, n = 7), 10 repetitive perfusion pulses (n = 4), or a sustained increase in perfusion pressure (150-200 s, perfusion step, n = 7) increase developed force by 2.7 +/- 1.1, 7.7 +/- 2.2, and 8.3 +/- 2.5 mN/mm(2) (means +/- SE, P < 0.05), respectively. The increase in developed force after a perfusion pulse is transient, whereas developed force during a perfusion step remains increased by 5.1 +/- 2.5 mN/mm(2) (P < 0.05) in the steady state. Inhibition of SACs by addition of gadolinium (10 micromol/l) or streptomycin (40 and 100 micromol/l) blunts the perfusion-induced increase in developed force. Incubation with 100 micromol/l N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine [nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibition], 10 micromol/l sodium nitroprusside (NO donation) and 0.1 micromol/l verapamil (L-type Ca(2+) channel blockade) are without effect on the perfusion-induced increase of developed force. We conclude that brief, repetitive, or sustained increases in coronary perfusion augment cardiac contractility through activation of stretch-activated ion channels, whereas endothelial NO release and L-type Ca(2+) channels are not involved.