Prospective multicenter evaluation of adherence to the Dutch guideline for children aged 0-16 years with fever without a source-febrile illness in children (FINCH) study.

Evaluation of guidelines in actual practice is a crucial step in guideline improvement. A retrospective evaluation of the Dutch guideline for children with fever without an apparent source (FWS) showed 50% adherence in young infants. We prospectively evaluated adherence to the Dutch guideline and its impact on management in current practice. Prospective observational multicenter cross-sectional study, including children 3 days to 16 years old presented for FWS at one of seven emergency departments in participating secondary and tertiary care hospitals in the Netherlands. Adherence to the Dutch FWS guideline, adapted from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline, was evaluated, and patterns in non-adherence and the impact of non-adherence on clinical outcomes and resource use were explored. Adherence to the guideline was 192/370 (52%). Adherence was lowest in patients categorized as high risk for severe infection (72/187, 39%), compared to the low-risk group (64/73, 88%). Differences in adherence were significant between risk categories (P < 0.001) but not between age categories. In case of non-adherence, less urinalysis, fewer bacterial cultures (blood, urine, and cerebral spinal fluid), and less empirical antibiotic treatment were performed (P < 0.050). Clinical outcomes were not significantly different between the non-adherence and the adherence group, particularly regarding missed severe infections. CONCLUSIONS: We found a high non-adherence rate of 48%, which did not lead to unfavorable clinical outcomes. This substantiates the need for a critical reevaluation of the FWS guideline and its indications for bacterial cultures, viral testing, and antibiotic treatment. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Despite the development of national guidelines, variation in practice is still substantial in the assessment of febrile children to distinguish severe infection from mild self-limiting disease. • Previous retrospective research suggests low adherence to national guidelines for febrile children in practice. WHAT IS NEW: • In case of non-adherence to the Dutch national guideline, similar to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline from the United Kingdom, physicians have used fewer resources than the guideline recommended without increasing missed severe infections.

Evaluating the Impact of the 2017 Dutch Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis Guideline.

BACKGROUND: In 2017, a new Dutch neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) guideline was implemented. It is an adaptation from the United Kingdom National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline and focuses on maternal and neonatal risk factors. We aim to assess if this guideline performs better at reducing the rate of antibiotic treatment for EOS than the old Dutch categorical EOS guideline, which focused primarily on group B streptococcus (GBS) testing and prophylaxis. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study in the Netherlands. Data were collected from two 12-month epochs (2015 vs. 2019). Neonates were included when treated for suspected EOS or when observed for an elevated EOS risk. RESULTS: The empirical antibiotic rate was 4.6% in both years. Prolonged antibiotic treatment (>48 u) increased from 24% in 2015 to 39% in 2019 ( P = 0.021). Adherence to the guideline decreased from 98% in 2015 to 84% in 2019 ( P < 0.001). Strict adherence in 2019 would have led to more antibiotic treatment (5.1% instead of 4.6%). The EOS incidence rate was comparable, namely 0.6% in 2015 and 0.0% in 2019 ( P = 0.480). The change in the definition of risk factors in 2019 led to less antibiotic treatment in case of a maternal fever during birth, from 48% in 2015 to 26% in 2019 ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The new Dutch categorical EOS guideline does not achieve its intended purpose of reducing empiric antibiotic therapy for suspected EOS. We advocate the need for a new screening strategy.

Group B Streptococcus Early-Onset Disease: New Preventive and Diagnostic Tools to Decrease the Burden of Antibiotic Use.

The difficulty in recognizing early-onset neonatal sepsis (EONS) in a timely manner due to non-specific symptoms and the limitations of diagnostic tests, combined with the risk of serious consequences if EONS is not treated in a timely manner, has resulted in a low threshold for starting empirical antibiotic treatment. New guideline strategies, such as the neonatal sepsis calculator, have been proven to reduce the antibiotic burden related to EONS, but lack sensitivity for detecting EONS. In this review, the potential of novel, targeted preventive and diagnostic methods for EONS is discussed from three different perspectives: maternal, umbilical cord and newborn perspectives. Promising strategies from the maternal perspective include Group B Streptococcus (GBS) prevention, exploring the virulence factors of GBS, maternal immunization and antepartum biomarkers. The diagnostic methods obtained from the umbilical cord are preliminary but promising. Finally, promising fields from the newborn perspective include biomarkers, new microbiological techniques and clinical prediction and monitoring strategies. Consensus on the definition of EONS and the standardization of research on novel diagnostic biomarkers are crucial for future implementation and to reduce current antibiotic overexposure in newborns.