Effect of anti-inflammatory therapy on vascular biomarkers for subclinical cardiovascular disease in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of 4 years of anti-inflammatory therapy on markers of subclinical vascular disease in rheumatoid arthritis patients. METHODS: Carotid intima media thickness (IMT), augmentation index (AIx@75) and pulse wave velocity (PWV) measurements were performed repeatedly in 61 RA patients (30 early RA starting with csDMARDs and 31 established RA starting with adalimumab) for 4 years. These markers were also measured in 29 controls with osteoarthritis at baseline (BL). RESULTS: IMT and AIx@75 at BL were higher in RA compared to OA, while PWV was higher in OA. In RA patients, AIx@75 and PWV decreased in the first 6 months after starting anti-inflammatory therapy. At 48 M, the level of AIx@75 remained lower than before therapy, while PWV at 48 M was comparable to BL (AIx@75: BL 28% (95% confidence interval 25-30%), 6 M 23% (20-26%), 48 M 25% (22-28%); PWV: BL 8.5 (7.8-9.2), 6 M 8.0 (7.1-8.9), 48 M 8.6 (7.6-9.6) m/s). IMT remained stable. There was an effect of disease activity (longitudinally, adjusted for changes over time) on IMT, AIx@75 and PWV. CONCLUSION: This study suggests modest beneficial changes in some surrogate markers of subclinical vascular disease after anti-inflammatory therapy. These changes were associated with improvement in disease activity markers. Whether or not these beneficial changes ultimately predict a reduction in clinicalcardiovascular endpoints remains to be established in prospective studies.

Interferon regulatory factor 5 gene variants rs2004640 and rs4728142 are associated with carotid intima media thickness but not with cardiovascular events in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality. Interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) gene polymorphisms rs2004640 and rs4728142 have been associated with autoimmune diseases, but also with atherosclerosis. Differences in IRF5 gene expression can lead to the production of different interferons and might play a role in the atherogenic process in RA. METHODS: We investigated the effects of IRF5 gene variants rs2004640 and rs4728142 on clinical parameters related to atherosclerosis, such as cIMT (in subgroup n=101), and new CV events (in whole cohort n=353). RESULTS: For rs2004640, cIMT values at baseline were highest within the group of patients carrying the GG-genotype, followed by GT- and TT- genotypes, which was statistically significant. Over time patients with the TT-genotype had the highest increase in cIMT. For rs4728142 cIMT values were also the highest for patients with the GG-genotype at baseline, but the difference between the groups was not statistically significant. Over time the highest increase in cIMT was in the patients with the AA-genotype. Both rs2004640 and rs4728142 were not associated with new CV events during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: IRF5 alleles are associated with changes in cIMT, but not with new CV events in RA. Although these findings implicate a role of the IRF5 transcription pathway in atherosclerosis, IRF5 single nucleotide polymorphisms do not appear to increase the risk of future CV events.

Atorvastatin is unlikely to prevent rheumatoid arthritis in high risk individuals: results from the prematurely stopped STAtins to Prevent Rheumatoid Arthritis (STAPRA) trial.

OBJECTIVES: Persons at high risk of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) might benefit from a low-risk pharmacological intervention aimed at primary prevention. Previous studies demonstrated disease-modifying effects of statins in patients with RA as well as an association between statin use and a decreased risk of RA development. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial investigated whether atorvastatin could prevent arthritis development in high-risk individuals. METHODS: Arthralgia patients with anticitrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) >3 xULN or ACPA and rheumatoid factor, without (a history of) arthritis, were randomised to receive atorvastatin 40 mg daily or placebo for 3 years. The calculated sample size was 220 participants. The primary endpoint was clinical arthritis. Cox regression analysis was used to determine the effect of atorvastatin on arthritis development. RESULTS: Due to a low inclusion rate, mainly because of an unwillingness to participate, the trial was prematurely stopped. Data of the 62 randomised individuals were analysed. Median follow-up was 14 (inner quartiles 6-35) months. Fifteen individuals (24%) developed arthritis: 9/31 (29%) in the atorvastatin group; 6/31 (19%) in the placebo group: HR 1.40, 95% CI 0.50 to 3.95. CONCLUSIONS: In this small set of randomised high-risk individuals, we did not demonstrate a protective effect of atorvastatin on arthritis development. The main reason for the low inclusion was unwillingness to participate; this may also impede other RA prevention trials. Further research to investigate and solve barriers for prevention trial participation is needed.

Arterial wall inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis is reduced by anti-inflammatory treatment.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), partly due to an increased prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, but also due to chronic systemic inflammation inducing atherosclerotic changes of the arterial wall. The aim of this study was to determine whether anti-inflammatory therapy for the treatment of RA has favorable effects on arterial wall inflammation in RA patients. METHODS: Arterial wall inflammation before and after 6 months of anti-inflammatory treatment was assessed in 49 early and established RA patients using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography with computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT). Arterial 18F-FDG uptake was quantified as maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in the thoracic aorta, abdominal aorta, carotid, iliac and femoral arteries. Early RA patients (n = 26) were treated with conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs with or without corticosteroids, whereas established RA patients (n = 23) were treated with adalimumab. RESULTS: In RA patients, overall SUVmax was over time reduced by 4% (difference -0.06, 95%CI -0.12 to -0.01, p = 0.02), with largest reductions in carotid (-8%, p = 0.001) and femoral arteries (-7%, p = 0.005). There was no difference in arterial wall inflammation change between early and established RA patients (SUVmax difference 0.003, 95%CI -0.11 to 0.12, p = 0.95). Change in arterial wall inflammation significantly correlated with change in serological inflammatory markers (erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein). CONCLUSION: Arterial wall inflammation in RA patients is reduced by anti-inflammatory treatment and this reduction correlates with reductions of serological inflammatory markers. These results suggest that anti-inflammatory treatment of RA has favorable effects on the risk of cardiovascular events in RA patients.

Arterial wall inflammation is increased in rheumatoid arthritis compared with osteoarthritis, as a marker of early atherosclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: RA is associated with higher risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease. Ongoing systemic inflammation is presumed to accelerate atherosclerosis by increasing inflammation in the arterial wall. However, evidence supporting this hypothesis is limited. We aimed to investigate arterial wall inflammation in RA vs OA, and its association with markers of inflammation and CV risk factors. METHODS: 18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET combined with CT (18F-FDG-PET/CT) was performed in RA (n = 61) and OA (n = 28) to investigate inflammatory activity in the wall of large arteries. Secondary analyses were performed in patients with early untreated RA (n = 30), and established RA, active under DMARD treatment (n = 31) vs OA. RESULTS: Patients with RA had significantly higher 18F-FDG uptake in the wall of the carotid arteries (beta 0.27, 95%CI 0.11-0.44, P <0.01) and the aorta (beta 0.47, 95%CI 0.17-0.76, P <0.01) when compared with OA, which persisted after adjustment for traditional CV risk factors. Patients with early RA had the highest 18F-FDG uptake, followed by patients with established RA and OA respectively. Higher ESR and DAS of 28 joints values were associated with higher 18F-FDG uptake in all arterial segments. CONCLUSION: Patients with RA have increased 18F-FDG uptake in the arterial wall compared with patients with OA, as a possible marker of early atherosclerosis. Furthermore, a higher level of clinical disease activity and circulating inflammatory markers was associated with higher arterial 18F-FDG uptake, which may support a role of arterial wall inflammation in the pathogenesis of vascular complications in patients with RA.

Variability in quantitative analysis of atherosclerotic plaque inflammation using 18F-FDG PET/CT.

BACKGROUND: 18F-FDG-PET(/CT) is increasingly used in studies aiming at quantifying atherosclerotic plaque inflammation. Considerable methodological variability exists. The effect of data acquisition and image analysis parameters on quantitative uptake measures, such as standardized uptake value (SUV) and target-to-background ratio (TBR) has not been investigated extensively. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to explore the effect of several data acquisition and image analysis parameters on quantification of vascular wall 18F-FDG uptake measures, in order to increase awareness of potential variability. METHODS: Three whole-body emission scans and a low-dose CT scan were acquired 38, 60 and 90 minutes after injection of 18F-FDG in six rheumatoid arthritis patients with high cardiovascular risk profiles.Data acquisition (1 and 2) and image analysis (3, 4 and 5) parameters comprised:1. 18F-FDG uptake time, 2. SUV normalisation, 3. drawing regions/volumes of interest (ROI's/VOI's) according to: a. hot-spot (HS), b. whole-segment (WS) and c. most-diseased segment (MDS), 4. Background activity, 5. Image matrix/voxel size.Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC's) and Bland Altman plots were used to assess agreement between these techniques and between observers. A linear mixed model was used to determine the association between uptake time and continuous outcome variables. RESULTS: 1. Significantly higher TBRmax values were found at 90 minutes (1,57 95%CI 1,35-1,80) compared to 38 minutes (1,30 95%CI 1,21-1,39) (P = 0,024) 2. Normalising SUV for BW, LBM and BSA significantly influences average SUVmax (2,25 (±0,60) vs 1,67 (±0,37) vs 0,058 (±0,013)). 3. Intraclass correlation coefficients were high in all vascular segments when SUVmax HS was compared to SUVmax WS. SUVmax HS was consistently higher than SUVmax MDS in all vascular segments. 4. Blood pool activity significantly decreases in all (venous and arterial) segments over time, but does not differ between segments. 5. Image matrix/voxel size does not influence SUVmax. CONCLUSION: Quantitative measures of vascular wall 18F-FDG uptake are affected mainly by changes in data acquisition parameters. Standardization of methodology needs to be considered when studying atherosclerosis and/or vasculitis.

HLA-DRB1 Amino Acid Positions 11/13, 71, and 74 Are Associated With Inflammation Level, Disease Activity, and the Health Assessment Questionnaire Score in Patients With Inflammatory Polyarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) susceptibility HLA-DRB1 haplotypes based on amino acid positions 11/13, 71, and 74 predict radiographic damage. The mechanism of action is unknown, but it may be mediated by inflammation. We undertook this study to systematically investigate the effect of these amino acids on nonradiographic measures of disease activity/outcomes. METHODS: We tested the association of RA susceptibility HLA-DRB1 amino acids with the C-reactive protein (CRP) level, the tender joint count (TJC), the swollen joint count (SJC), the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28), and the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score in the Norfolk Arthritis Register (NOAR) and Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Study (ERAS) cohorts. Longitudinal modeling of disease activity/outcomes was performed using generalized linear latent and mixed models. Mediation analysis was performed using directed acyclic graphs to investigate the paths from genetic factors to outcome. RESULTS: A total of 2,158 patients were available for analysis in the NOAR cohort. Valine at position 11 showed the strongest association with the CRP level (P = 2.21 × 10-6 ), the SJC (P = 7.51 × 10-6 ), and the DAS28 (P = 0.002); it was marginally associated with the HAQ score (P = 0.044) but not with the TJC. The same amino acid and haplotype risk hierarchy observed for susceptibility and radiographic severity was observed for the CRP level and nonradiographic measures of disease activity/outcome, apart from the TJC. The results were replicated in the ERAS cohort. The effect of valine at position 11 on the SJC was mainly mediated by anti-citrullinated protein antibody status, the effect of which was mainly mediated by inflammation; however, the effect of valine at position 11 was also independent of the CRP level (P = 1.6 × 10-4 ). CONCLUSION: Genetic markers of RA susceptibility located within HLA-DRB1 determine the levels of clinical and systemic inflammation independently, and also determine all objective measures of disease activity and outcome.

Reduction of Inflammation Drives Lipid Changes in Ankylosing Spondylitis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of changing inflammation on lipid levels in ankylosing spondylitis. METHODS: In a cohort of 230 patients, lipid levels were measured at baseline and after 52 weeks of treatment with tumor necrosis factor-α-blocking agents (anti-TNF). RESULTS: Total cholesterol (TC; +4.6%), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (+4.3%), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C; +3.7%) increased upon treatment. Changes were most evident in patients with substantial reduction in inflammatory levels (TC +8.2% vs +1.6% and HDL-C +8.3% vs +2.2% in patients with C-reactive protein ≥ 10 mg/l normalizing upon treatment vs CRP < 10 mg/l throughout treatment period). CONCLUSION: Anti-TNF therapy results in lipid changes mostly when inflammation is appreciably modified.

Cardiovascular risk management in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis: a detailed evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is an inflammatory disease with documented elevated cardiovascular (CV) risk due to systemic inflammation and a higher prevalence of CV risk factors. CV risk management (CV-RM) could be an effective method to reduce CV mortality and morbidity in AS patients. We assessed CV risk and evaluated guideline adherence according to the Dutch CV-RM guideline. METHODS: This study was conducted with a cohort of consecutive AS patients eligible for treatment with a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) -α inhibitor. Data from the Dutch National Institute for Public Health and Environment was used to compare the prevalence of CV risk factors in AS patients with the Dutch background population. RESULTS: In total, 254 consecutive AS patients were included. The prevalences of hypertension (41% vs 31%) and smoking (43% vs 27%) were substantially higher in AS patients as compared to the general Dutch background population. Of 138 AS patients older than 40 years the 10-years CV risk could be calculated. Fifty-one of these 138 patients (37%) had an indication for CV risk treatment. CV risk treatment was initiated in 42 of the 51 (82%), however, in only 12 of the 51 (24%) patients treatment targets for either hypertension or hypercholesterolemia were reached. CONCLUSION: The increased rates of hypertension and smoking illustrate the importance of CV-RM in AS patients. Although the majority of all AS patients eligible for CV-RM received CV risk medication, CV-RM remains a challenge for treating physicians, as treatment targets were not achieved in three-quarter of the eligible patients.

Tumour necrosis factor blocking agents and progression of subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

BACKGROUND: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is associated with an increased cardiovascular risk that might be due to the chronic underlying inflammatory process. We investigated whether subclinical atherosclerosis of the carotid artery in patients with AS was reduced after anti-inflammatory treatment with tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors in a prospective observational cohort study. METHODS: 67 out of 81 AS patients who used TNF inhibitors and underwent ultrasonography at baseline returned for follow-up after 4.9 years. Of all patients, 12 (15%) discontinued the use of TNF inhibitors. Assessments of medication use, AS-related factors and cardiovascular risk factors were measured at baseline and repeated at follow-up. B-mode carotid ultrasonography was used to investigate arterial wall parameters, including carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and Young's elastic modulus (YEM). RESULTS: After a median 4.9 years of follow-up, cIMT did not change significantly (paired t test +0.011 mm, p=0.561) in those who continued the use of TNF inhibitors, while cIMT increased substantially (+0.057 mm, p=0.069) in those who did not continue their use of TNF inhibitors. The effect of TNF inhibitors was mainly mediated by a subsequent decrease in AS disease activity. Vascular elasticity (as measured with YEM) did not change significantly in patients who discontinued TNF inhibitors or those who continued TNF inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: The use of TNF inhibitors might stabilise or slow down the progression of subclinical atherosclerosis in AS patients, reflecting a decreased cardiovascular risk in these patients.

Confounding by indication probably distorts the relationship between steroid use and cardiovascular disease in rheumatoid arthritis: results from a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis exposed to glucocorticoids. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of exposure to glucocorticoids in a prospective cohort of 353 patients with rheumatoid arthritis followed from June 2001 up to November 2011 for incident cardiovascular disease in a hospital-based outpatient cohort in the Netherlands. Hazard ratios with 95%-confidence intervals were calculated for the association between different types of exposure to glucocorticoids and incident cardiovascular disease. Associations were adjusted for demographics, cardiovascular risk factors and disease related parameters. RESULTS: Recent and current exposure to glucocorticoids were associated with incident cardiovascular disease, as was a longer duration of exposure and cumulative exposure to glucocorticoids. Adjustment for disease activity and severity negated the association. CONCLUSION: In observational studies the finding of incident cardiovascular disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis exposed to glucocorticoids is strongly confounded by indication due to high disease activity. The adverse cardiovascular effects of glucocorticoids might be balanced by positive effects working through inflammation control.

Myocardial infarction after rituximab treatment for rheumatoid arthritis: Is there a link?

Rituximab is an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody often used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Infusion reactions sometimes develop following rituximab administration. Delayed complications are rare. Acute coronary syndromes are listed as sideeffects of rituximab therapy. We report two cases of acute myocardial infarction following rituximab therapy for RA and review the literature regarding cardiac events in patients treated with rituximab. We would like to raise awareness of this possible complication in patients treated with rituximab.

Management of cardiovascular risk in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: evidence and expert opinion.

The risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality is increased in rheumatoid arthritis. The classical cardiovascular risk factors, including smoking, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, insulin resistance and diabetes mellitus, obesity and physical inactivity do not appear to explain the excess cardiovascular risk in rheumatoid arthritis, although they do contribute, albeit in a different way or to a lesser extent, to rheumatoid arthritis in comparison with the general population. A very important link between rheumatoid arthritis and cardiovascular disease is inflammation as it plays a key role in all stages of atherosclerosis: from endothelial dysfunction to plaque rupture and thrombosis. It also has an influence on and accentuates some traditional cardiovascular risk factors, such as dyslipidaemia, obesity and insulin resistance. To date, the exact pathophysiologic mechanism by which this relation between cardiovascular disease and rheumatoid arthritis can be explained is not completely clear. Cardiovascular risk management in rheumatoid arthritis is mandatory. Unfortunately, the way this should be done remains a point of discussion. In this review issues regarding cardiovascular risk in rheumatoid arthritis and its management will be addressed, according to evidence presented in the latest studies and our own experience-based opinion.

Different type of carotid arterial wall remodeling in rheumatoid arthritis compared with healthy subjects: a case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with an increased cardiovascular (CV) risk, but mechanisms behind this increased risk have not been fully elucidated. Carotid arterial remodeling is the change of structural properties in response to hemodynamic or metabolic factors aimed at keeping wall stress within certain limits. This process might become maladaptive when stress on the arterial wall increases beyond these limits. We investigated whether maladaptive carotid arterial remodeling is present in RA compared with control subjects. METHODS: The 2 cohorts were 96 patients with RA and 274 healthy subjects, who were investigated cross-sectionally. Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and interadventitial diameter (IAD) were assessed by B-mode carotid ultrasonography. Lumen diameter (LD), circumferential wall stress (CWS), and circumferential wall tension (CWT) were calculated. Linear regression analyses were used to investigate the association between presence of RA and carotid arterial remodeling. RESULTS: Compared with healthy subjects, RA was associated with a 0.40 mm (9.3%) greater LD, 0.41 mm (7.8%) greater IAD, 10% higher CWS, and 8% higher CWT. The groups had comparable cIMT. Associations remained similar after exclusion of patients with prior CV disease and after adjustment for demographic factors and CV risk factors. CONCLUSION: RA is associated with maladaptive outward carotid arterial remodeling. These results are relevant because maladaptive outward remodeling is associated with plaque instability and rupture. These results indicate an alternative pathway, beyond the traditional CV risk factors, in RA that amplifies the CV risk.

Cardiovascular disease prevalence in patients with inflammatory arthritis, diabetes mellitus and osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study in primary care.

BACKGROUND: There is accumulating evidence for an increased cardiovascular burden in inflammatory arthritis, but the true magnitude of this cardiovascular burden is still debated. We sought to determine the prevalence rate of non-fatal cardiovascular disease (CVD) in inflammatory arthritis, diabetes mellitus and osteoarthritis (non-systemic inflammatory comparator) compared to controls, in primary care. METHODS: Data on CVD morbidity (ICPC codes K75 (myocardial infarction), K89 (transient ischemic attack), and/or K90 (stroke/cerebrovascular accident)) from patients with inflammatory arthritis (n = 1,518), diabetes mellitus (n = 11,959), osteoarthritis (n = 4,040) and controls (n = 158,439) were used from the Netherlands Information Network of General Practice (LINH), a large nationally representative primary care based cohort. Data were analyzed using multi-level logistic regression analyses and corrected for age, gender, hypercholesterolemia and hypertension. RESULTS: CVD prevalence rates were significantly higher in inflammatory arthritis, diabetes mellitus and osteoarthritis compared with controls. These results attenuated - especially in diabetes mellitus - but remained statistically significant after adjustment for age, gender, hypertension and hypercholesterolemia for inflammatory arthritis (OR = 1.5 (1.2-1.9)) and diabetes mellitus (OR = 1.3 (1.2-1.4)). The association between osteoarthritis and CVD reversed after adjustment (OR = 0.8 (0.7-1.0)). CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm an increased prevalence rate of CVD in inflammatory arthritis to levels resembling diabetes mellitus. By contrast, lack of excess CVD in osteoarthritis further suggests that the systemic inflammatory load is critical to the CVD burden in inflammatory arthritis.

The effects of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors on cardiovascular risk in rheumatoid arthritis.

There is abundant evidence that rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a chronic inflammatory disorder, is associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular (CV) disease. While there may be several mechanisms contributing to a higher CV risk in RA patients, inflammation is considered to be the main cause explaining the excess CV burden. Inflammatory processes appear pivotal to the atherothrombotic process and are linked to endothelial dysfunction, fatty streak initiation and progression, deterioration of fatty streaks into (unstable) plaques, and plaque rupture. Moreover, systemic inflammation, through tumor necrosis factor (TNF) or related cytokines, appears to accelerate atherothrombosis either directly or via effects on conventional and novel CV risk factors, such as lipids and lipoproteins, blood pressure, haemostatic factors, and insulin resistance. New and highly specific therapeutic agents (TNF inhibitors) may significantly lower CV risk in RA. This review summarizes the evidence base supporting the notion that TNF inhibitors confer benefit CV disease risk in RA.

The effect of TNF-alpha blocking therapy on lipid levels in rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Changes in the lipid profile have been described in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) following therapy with tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha blocking agents. However, thus far, results have been inconsistent. Therefore, we investigated changes in lipid levels after TNF-alpha blocking therapy using meta-analysis of published data. METHODS: The literature was searched to identify studies assessing changes in total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLc), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, atherogenic index (ie, TC/HDLc ratio), and apolipoprotein levels in response to TNF-alpha blocking therapy. Weighted mean levels of lipids at different time points and subsequent changes in these lipid levels between these time points were calculated with multivariate linear mixed models. RESULTS: Data were available on TC in 15 studies encompassing 766 RA patients and on HDLc in 14 studies encompassing 736 RA patients. TC increased significantly (maximum increase of 10%) and HDLc increased significantly in the first 2 to 6 weeks of therapy (maximum increase of 7%), after which it remained more or less stable. The atherogenic index did not significantly change over time. There was too limited information to evaluate changes in other lipids and apolipoproteins. CONCLUSIONS: TNF-alpha blocking therapy has a modest effect on TC and HDLc levels in RA patients with no significant overall effect on the atherogenic index. Whether TNF-alpha blocking effects on qualitative lipid changes (structure and function) are more relevant to their presumed vascular benefits requires further study.

Carotid intima media thickness in rheumatoid arthritis as compared to control subjects: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Carotid intima media thickness (cIMT) is frequently used to identify populations at elevated cardiovascular risk. A systematic literature search and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate cIMT difference between RA and controls. METHODS: The literature was screened to identify all available studies comparing cIMT in RA patients and controls. Random effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate the overall mean cIMT difference between both groups. Meta-regression was performed to assess the influence of age and the degree of comparability regarding established cardiovascular risk factors on cIMT difference. Potential publication bias was examined by a funnel plot and Egger test. RESULTS: From 22 studies, cIMT data were available from 1384 RA patients and 1147 controls. In 17 of the studies, RA patients had a statistically significantly greater cIMT. The overall mean cIMT difference was 0.09 mm (95%CI: 0.07-0.11 mm). Heterogeneity was observed (I(2) 72.5%, P < 0.001). A likely source of heterogeneity was the difference in cardiovascular risk factors between RA patients and controls at baseline, but not age. The funnel plot did not show a skewed or asymmetrical shape, which was supported by the Egger's test (P = 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Our observations support the current evidence base for an increased cardiovascular burden in RA and support the use of cIMT in observational studies in RA patients. The next step is to determine its utility as a surrogate cardiovascular risk marker in RA in prospective studies.