ABSTRACT
Digital and interventional radiology are increasingly important areas of radiology. Quality control (QC) of such equipment is of particular importance to avoid unnecessary high doses and to help to achieve good image quality. Within the DIMOND III project, equipment requirements and specifications for digital and interventional radiology have been formulated. A protocol for QC tests has been drafted based on various national and international recommendations. Tests are included for various parts of the imaging chain, i.e. X-ray tube and generator, X-ray tube control system, laser printer and display station, and image quality and patient dose. Preliminary tolerance levels have been set for the various tests, after initial measurements. To check the suitability of QC tests and stated tolerance levels, measurements were made at the University Hospital Gasthuisberg in Leuven for equipment used for paediatric radiology and a unit used for chest examinations. The results of the various tests are reported.
Subject(s)
Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods , Radiology, Interventional/instrumentation , Radiology, Interventional/methods , Humans , Phantoms, Imaging , Quality Control , Radiation Protection , Radiographic Image Enhancement/instrumentation , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Radiometry , Technology, Radiologic , X-RaysABSTRACT
Council Directive 97/43/Euratom (Medical Exposure Directive) states that member States of the European Union shall promote the establishment and use of diagnostic reference levels for radio-diagnostic examinations. Dose surveys can form the basis for the establishment of diagnostic reference levels. In view of the implementation of the Medical Exposure Directive in the Netherlands, a survey of dose and image quality has been performed for posteroanterior (PA) chest radiography in 2001. In this survey, 25 participants were selected from a list of 175 Dutch hospitals, whereas in a previous PA chest survey (about 10 years ago) participation was voluntary and participants came predominantly from the south-western part of the Netherlands. For conventional screen-film PA chest radiography, the present results for patient dose and image quality are quite similar to those results from the previous survey. The fraction of conventional X-ray systems utilizing lung compensation filters has remained approximately the same. For dedicated digital chest radiography systems, image quality is better than for conventional systems, but doses vary and can assume relatively high values. The results indicate that there are still possibilities for dose reduction, without loss of image quality. The 75 percentile value of the entrance surface dose distribution is approximately 0.13 mGy.