Visual impairment due to retinopathy of prematurity and concomitant disabilities in the Netherlands.

AIM: Determine incidence of visual impairment due to retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and concomitant disabilities between 2009 and 2018 in the Netherlands and compare data to four former similar studies. Secondly, monitor if infants were missed for ROP-screening since the adoption of stricter, risk factor guided criteria (2013). METHODS: Retrospective inventory on anonymous data of infants diagnosed with ROP from Dutch visual impairment-institutes. Data including: best corrected visual acuity, ROP-treatment and concomitant disabilities: bronchopulmonary dysplasia, behavioral abnormalities, epilepsy, hearing deficit, developmental delay, cerebral palsy and cerebral visual impairment. During the study period, lower age limit for neonatal life support (2010) and higher oxygen saturation targets (2014) were implemented. RESULTS: Records of 53 infants were analyzed. Visual impairment incidence due to ROP was 2.02 per 100.000 live births (2000-2009: 1.84, p = 0.643). Compared to earlier periods (1975-2000), a significant decrease was observed. The incidence of concomitant disabilities remained stable. Mean gestational age (GA) continued to decrease to 26.6 ± 1.9 weeks (2000-2009: 27.4 ± 2.0 weeks, p = 0.047). All patients met the screening inclusion criteria. CONCLUSION: The incidence of visual impairment due to ROP and concomitant disabilities between 2009 and 2018 has not increased, despite lower GA and higher oxygen saturation targets. None of the infants were missed for ROP screening following introduction of more restricted screening inclusion criteria.

Nationwide inventory on retinopathy of prematurity screening in the Netherlands.

PURPOSE: Provide up-to-date insight in incidence of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), logistics of screening and treatment in the Netherlands and influence of the new national ROP guideline in which more stringent screening criteria were implemented and the early treatment for ROP criteria (ETROP) were emphasised. METHODS: Multicentre prospective nationwide study including all preterm infants, born in the Netherlands in 2017, and considered eligible for ROP screening. Anonymised data from ophthalmologists and paediatricians were merged. Outcome data were compared with the first national ROP inventory (NEDROP-1, 2009). RESULTS: In 2017, 1492 infants were live born with gestational age (GA) <32 weeks (2009: 1662); 1287 infants were eligible for screening (2009: 2033). Ophthalmologists screened 1085 infants, versus 1688 in 2009, corrected with factor 1.114 for the difference in number of live births, a 28.4% (479/1688) decrease in screened infants was seen. Among surviving infants with GA <32 week, ROP was found in 305/1492 babies, 20.4% (2009: 324/1662, 19.5%) of which 49/1492 stage ≥3, 3.3% (2009: 30/1662, 1.8%). In all infants, report on presence or absence of plus disease was provided, according to the ETROP criteria. Treatment was performed in 39 infants. Of infants with ROP stage ≥3, 3/49 (6.1%) progressed to retinal detachment (2009: 6/30, 20.0%). CONCLUSION: The overall ROP incidence expressed as a percentage, remained stable but the number of infants that developed severe ROP nearly doubled. A near one-third reduction in screened infants shows satisfactory implementation of the new screening criteria. A notable decrease in retinal detachment delineates improved treatment outcome.

Cost and effects of risk factor guided screening strategies for retinopathy of prematurity for different treatment strategies.

PURPOSE: To investigate the cost and effects of risk factor guided screening strategies for retinopathy of prematurity. METHODS: Clinical data from the Netherlands Retinopathy of Prematurity study (NEDROP study) that included all infants screened for ROP and born in 2009 were used to assess the cost and effects of several screening strategies for ROP using different criteria: (1) gestational age (GA), (2) birthweight (BW), (3) combined GA-BW and (4) combined GA-BW and presence of risk factors. Two treatment strategies were evaluated: the infants actually treated in the NEDROP study (n = 17) and all infants detected with severe ROP (n = 29). RESULTS: The most efficient screening strategy to include all infants treated for both treatment strategies is to screen all infants with a GA of 30 weeks or less and a BW of 1250 g or lower together with infants with a GA of 30-32 weeks and a BW of 1250-1500 g with at least one risk factor. The marginal cost ranged from €43 848 to € 226 914 per additional infant with improved vision. CONCLUSION: The current Dutch guideline may be improved: the same effectiveness can be obtained for lower costs. Releasing the precondition that no infants with severe ROP might be missed will lead to lower costs, but this will also lead to a lower number of infants with improved visual acuity. The costs of detecting all infants with severe ROP seem acceptable for society when the QALY gain and savings from a societal perspective resulting from improved vision are taken into account.

Nationwide inventory of risk factors for retinopathy of prematurity in the Netherlands.

OBJECTIVES: To study the incidence and risk factors for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in the Netherlands. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, approximating population-based study that included infants with gestational age (GA) <32 weeks and/or birth weight (BW) <1500 g born in 2009. Pediatricians and ophthalmologists of all hospitals involved in care for premature infants reported data that were matched with the national perinatal database for risk factor analysis. RESULTS: Of 1380 infants, median GA 29.8 weeks (IQR 28.1-31.1) and median BW 1260 g (IQR 1020-1500), ROP developed in 21.9%. Logistic regression identified GA and BW as risk factors for ROP (P < .001). After adjustment for GA and BW, additional risk factors were inhaled nitric oxide (iNO; OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.1-6.2, P = .03), stay at a neonatal intensive care unit >28 days (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.6, P = .03), and artificial ventilation >7 days (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.5, P = .02). Prenatal glucocorticoids (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-0.8, P < .001) and female sex (OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5-0.99, P = .04) showed a lesser incidence of ROP. iNO remained significant after correction for all significant factors (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.1-6.2, P = .03). CONCLUSION: In addition to established risk factors (GA, BW, stay at a neonatal intensive care unit >28 days, and artificial ventilation >7 days), treatment with iNO as risk factor for ROP is a novel finding.

Exposure keratopathy following silicone frontalis suspension in adult neuro- and myogenic ptosis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence of exposure keratopathy following silicone frontalis suspension in adult neuro- and myogenic blepharoptosis. METHOD: Retrospective noncomparative analysis of the charts of 69 cases (101 eyelids) of silicone frontalis suspension. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients (93 eyelids) had myogenic ptosis, and eight patients (eight eyelids) had neurogenic ptosis. Preoperative diagnoses included chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia, myotonic dystrophy, oculopharyngeal dystrophy, third cranial nerve palsy because of trauma or other causes. Average age at the time of operation was 54. Mean interval between the intervention and the first and second postoperative control was 8 and 28 months, respectively. Thirty-one patients (31 eyelids) needed a second follow-up visit. Postoperative punctate epithelial erosions (PEE) were encountered most frequently in patients with Steinert's disease (42% of eyes) and congenital ptosis (33% of eyes). Patients with oculopharyngeal dystrophy did not develop PEE. Corneal ulceration developed in three eyes (two patients): one eye was successfully treated with local antibiotic ointments and lubricants, a bilateral corneal ulceration in the second patient was successfully treated with partial conjunctival grafts. CONCLUSION: This study cohort demonstrated a 26% risk of exposure keratopathy following silicone frontalis suspension. The risk of major corneal complications, such as ulceration, was low (3%).