Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Neurosci ; 116: 81-86, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37657169

ABSTRACT

Dry electrode electroencephalography (EEG) has the potential to diagnose ischemic stroke in the acute phase. In the current study we determined the correlation between EEG spectral power and ischemic stroke size and location as determined by computed tomography perfusion (CTP). Dry electrode EEG recordings were performed in patients with acute ischemic stroke in the emergency room. CTP preceded the EEG recordings as part of standard imaging protocol. Infarct core volume, total hypoperfused volume and local cerebral blood flow (CBF) were estimated with CTP. Additionally, global and local EEG spectral power were determined. We used Spearman's correlation coefficients to evaluate the correlation between variables. We included 27 patients (median age 72 [IQR:69-80] years, 15/27 [56%] men). Median CTP-to-EEG time was 32 (range:8-138) minutes. Hypoperfused volumes were estimated for 12/27 (44%) patients. Infarct core volume correlated best with global delta power (ρ = 0.76, p < 0.01), total hypoperfused volume with global alpha power (ρ = -0.58, p = 0.05), and local CBF with local alpha power (ρ = 0.43, p < 0.01). We conclude that dry electrode EEG signals slow down with increasing hypoperfused volume, which could potentially be used to discriminate between small and large ischemic strokes.


Subject(s)
Ischemic Stroke , Male , Humans , Aged , Female , Perfusion , Electrodes , Electroencephalography , Infarction , Cerebrovascular Circulation
2.
Clin Neurophysiol Pract ; 8: 88-91, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37215683

ABSTRACT

Objective: Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are promising for artifact detection in electroencephalography (EEG) data, but require large amounts of data. Despite increasing use of dry electrodes for EEG data acquisition, dry electrode EEG datasets are sparse. We aim to develop an algorithm for clean versus artifact dry electrode EEG data classification using transfer learning. Methods: Dry electrode EEG data were acquired in 13 subjects while physiological and technical artifacts were induced. Data were per 2-second segment labeled as clean or artifact and split in an 80% train and 20% test set. With the train set, we fine-tuned a pre-trained CNN for clean versus artifact wet electrode EEG data classification using 3-fold cross validation. The three fine-tuned CNNs were combined in one final clean versus artifact classification algorithm, in which the majority vote was used for classification. We calculated accuracy, F1-score, precision, and recall of the pre-trained CNN and fine-tuned algorithm when applied to unseen test data. Results: The algorithm was trained on 0.40 million and tested on 0.17 million overlapping EEG segments. The pre-trained CNN had a test accuracy of 65.6%. The fine-tuned clean versus artifact classification algorithm had an improved test accuracy of 90.7%, F1-score of 90.2%, precision of 89.1% and recall of 91.2%. Conclusions: Despite a relatively small dry electrode EEG dataset, transfer learning enabled development of a high performing CNN-based algorithm for clean versus artifact classification. Significance: Development of CNNs for classification of dry electrode EEG data is challenging as dry electrode EEG datasets are sparse. Here, we show that transfer learning can be used to overcome this problem.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...