Current practice in antireflux and hiatal hernia surgery: exploration of the Belgian field.

BACKGROUND: In Belgium, no publicly available information exists on the spread, quality, results nor follow-up of antireflux and hiatal hernia surgery, in contrast to the recently centralized esophageal cancer surgery. The aim of this study was to create a snap shot of the current practice in Belgium. METHODS: An online questionnaire was distributed among all members of the Royal Belgian Society for Surgery in autumn 2021. A total of 33 questions spread over four sections were asked, covering demographics, current practice (case load, case mix, indications, preoperative workup, patient information, average length of stay, follow up, quality of life (QOL)), operative techniques and future thoughts. RESULTS: Twenty-four surgeons completed the questionnaire. Surgical indications are discussed multidisciplinary and based on guidelines in 67%. Workup includes endoscopy, pH-monitoring and manometry in 100%. Barium swallow, impedance and gastric emptying tests were added in respectively 83%, 42% and 13%. Symptom or QOL scores were used in 17%. About 81% are performed as primary surgery, 18% redo surgery and 1% resections. Laparoscopic procedures are reported in 99%: Nissen(-Rosetti) 79%, Toupet/Lind 15%, partial gastrectomy 5% and Collis gastroplasty 1%. Discharge is planned on POD1 in 42% and on POD2 in 54%. 50% performs follow-up < 1 year. Interest in further clinical research collaboration was expressed in 92%. CONCLUSION: Antireflux and hiatal hernia surgery is not standardized in Belgium. There is an evident variety in clinical practice, but this questionnaire shows similarity amongst respondents regarding workup and surgical approach. There is a willingness for future research collaborations.

Impact of the introduction of an enhanced recovery pathway in esophageal cancer surgery: a cohort study and propensity score matching analysis.

Enhanced recovery pathways (ERP) have the potential to improve clinical outcomes. Aim of this study was to determine the impact of ERP on perioperative results as compared with traditional care (TC) after esophagectomy. In this study, two cohorts were compared. Cohort 1 represented 296 patients to whom TC was provided. Cohort 2 consisted of 200 unselected ERP patients. Primary endpoints were postoperative complications. Secondary endpoints were the length of stay and 30-day readmission rates. To confirm the possible impact of ERP, a propensity matched analysis (1:1) was conducted. A significant decrease in complications was found in ERP patients, especially for pneumonia and respiratory failure requiring reintubation (39% in TC and 14% in ERP; P<0.0001 and 17% vs. 12%; P<0.0001, respectively) and postoperative blood transfusion (26.7%-11%; P<0.0001). Furthermore, median length of stay was also significantly shorter: 13 days (interquartile range [IQR] 10-23) in TC compared with 10 days (IQR 8-14) in ERP patients (P<0.0001). The 30-day readmission rate (5.4% in TC and 9% in ERP; P=0.121) and in-hospital mortality rate (4.4% in TC and 2.5% in ERP; P=0.270) were not significantly affected. A propensity score matching confirmed a significant impact on pneumonia (P=0.0001), anastomotic leak (P=0.047), several infectious complications (P=0.01-0.034), blood transfusion (P=0.001), Comprehensive Complications Index (P=0.01), and length of stay (P=0.0001). We conclude that ERP for esophagectomy is associated with significantly fewer postoperative complications and blood transfusions, which results in a significant decrease of length of stay without affecting readmission and mortality rates.

Fit-for-Discharge Criteria after Esophagectomy: An International Expert Delphi Consensus.

There are no internationally recognized criteria available to determine preparedness for hospital discharge after esophagectomy. This study aims to achieve international consensus using Delphi methodology. The expert panel consisted of 40 esophageal surgeons spanning 16 countries and 4 continents. During a 3-round, web-based Delphi process, experts voted for discharge criteria using 5-point Likert scales. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Consensus was reached if agreement was ≥75% in round 3. Consensus was achieved for the following basic criteria: nutritional requirements are met by oral intake of at least liquids with optional supplementary nutrition via jejunal feeding tube. The patient should have passed flatus and does not require oxygen during mobilization or at rest. Central venous catheters should be removed. Adequate analgesia at rest and during mobilization is achieved using both oral opioid and non-opioid analgesics. All vital signs should be normal unless abnormal preoperatively. Inflammatory parameters should be trending down and close to normal (leucocyte count ≤12G/l and C-reactive protein ≤80 mg/dl). This multinational Delphi survey represents the first expert-led process for consensus criteria to determine 'fit-for-discharge' status after esophagectomy. Results of this Delphi survey may be applied to clinical outcomes research as an objective measure of short-term recovery. Furthermore, standardized endpoints identified through this process may be used in clinical practice to guide decisions regarding patient discharge and may help to reduce the risk of premature discharge or prolonged admission.

Diagnostic criteria and symptom grading for delayed gastric conduit emptying after esophagectomy for cancer: international expert consensus based on a modified Delphi process.

Delayed gastric conduit emptying (DGCE) after esophagectomy for cancer is associated with adverse outcomes and troubling symptoms. Widely accepted diagnostic criteria and a symptom grading tool for DGCE are missing. This hampers the interpretation and comparison of studies. A modified Delphi process, using repeated web-based questionnaires, combined with live interim group discussions was conducted by 33 experts within the field, from Europe, North America, and Asia. DGCE was divided into early DGCE if present within 14 days of surgery and late if present later than 14 days after surgery. The final criteria for early DGCE, accepted by 25 of 27 (93%) experts, were as follows: >500 mL diurnal nasogastric tube output measured on the morning of postoperative day 5 or later or >100% increased gastric tube width on frontal chest x-ray projection together with the presence of an air-fluid level. The final criteria for late DGCE accepted by 89% of the experts were as follows: the patient should have 'quite a bit' or 'very much' of at least two of the following symptoms; early satiety/fullness, vomiting, nausea, regurgitation or inability to meet caloric need by oral intake and delayed contrast passage on upper gastrointestinal water-soluble contrast radiogram or on timed barium swallow. A symptom grading tool for late DGCE was constructed grading each symptom as: 'not at all', 'a little', 'quite a bit', or 'very much', generating 0, 1, 2, or 3 points, respectively. For the five symptoms retained in the diagnostic criteria for late DGCE, the minimum score would be 0, and the maximum score would be 15. The final symptom grading tool for late DGCE was accepted by 27 of 31 (87%) experts. For the first time, diagnostic criteria for early and late DGCE and a symptom grading tool for late DGCE are available, based on an international expert consensus process.

Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure therapy for the treatment of oesophageal anastomotic leaks.

Persisting suture dehiscence with oesophageal anastomotic leaks after thoracic surgery is a difficult complication, especially when a surgical repair fails. We report here endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure therapy as a novel endoscopic treatment for the management of oesophageal anastomotic leaks. Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure therapy is a minimally invasive method to treat anastomotic leakage by positioning an open-pored polyurethane sponge and a suction tube connected to a wound drainage system into the opening of the wound cavity. This multidisciplinary endoscopic and surgical approach is a successful therapy for the management of suture dehiscence with oesophageal anastomotic leaks after thoracic surgery or oesophageal perforations.

A structured training program for minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer- a Delphi consensus study in Europe.

Evidence suggests that structured training programs for laparoscopic procedures can ensure a safe standard of skill acquisition prior to independent practice. Although minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIO) is technically demanding, no consensus on requirements for training for the MIO procedure exists. The aim of this study is to determine essential steps required for a structured training program in MIO using the Delphi consensus methodology. Eighteen MIO experts from 13 European hospitals were asked to participate in this study. The consensus process consisted of two structured meetings with the expert panel, and two Delphi questionnaire rounds. A list of items required for training MIO were constructed for three key domains of MIO, including (1) requisite criteria for units wishing to be trained and (2) to proctor MIO, and (3) a framework of a MIO training program. Items were rated by the experts on a scale 1-5, where 1 signified 'not important' and 5 represented 'very important.' Consensus for each domain was defined as achieving Cronbach alpha ≥0.70. Items were considered as fundamental when ≥75% of experts rated it important (4) or very important (5). Both Delphi rounds were completed by 16 (89%) of the 18 invited experts, with a median experience of 18 years with minimally invasive surgery. Consensus was achieved for all three key domains. Following two rounds of a 107-item questionnaire, 50 items were rated as essential for training MIO. A consensus among European MIO experts on essential items required for training MIO is presented. The identified items can serve as directive principles and core standards for creating a comprehensive training program for MIO.

Prognostic value of the circumferential resection margin and its definitions in esophageal cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

The accepted importance of a positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) (defined as R1 in the TNM classification) is based on histopathology of the resection specimen obtained after primary surgery in esophageal cancer patients. The aim of this study is to look for the prognostic value of CRM after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and to compare the clinical significance of a histologically CRM < 1 mm from the cut margin (Royal College of Pathologists definition of R1) to a positive cut margin (College of American Pathologists definition of R1) and to ≥1 mm margin (R0) resections in patients with ypT3-esophageal tumors after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Between 2000 and 2014, 458 patients who received esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy were selected. Overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated by means of Kaplan-Meier curves and compared by Cox regression analysis. There were 163 (35.9%) patients who had a ypT3 tumor; in 118 (72.4%) resection was complete (R0). In 37 (22.7%) patients a CRM < 1 mm was found and 8 (4.9%) had a circumferential R1-resection. CRM involvement was inversely correlated with tumor regression grading, lymph node capsular involvement, and number of positive lymph nodes. On univariate analysis, no statistically significant difference was found between R0-resection and CRM < 1 mm (P = 0.103) for OS, but DFS showed a significant difference (P = 0.025). Circumferential R1-resections showed a significant difference compared to R0-resections for OS and DFS (both P = 0.002). In multivariate analysis, extracapsular lymph node involvement and circumferential R1-resection were withheld as independent prognosticators for OS, whereas extracapsular lymph node involvement, absence of regression on the primary tumor and circumferential R1-resection were withheld for DFS. After correcting for different variables in the multivariate model, CRM < 1 mm showed no statistical difference compared to R0-resections neither for OS nor for DFS. After neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, CRM is correlated with biological behavior of the tumor and with therapy response. Furthermore it is an independent prognosticator for OS and DFS. However CRM < 1 mm itself is no independent prognosticator for OS nor DFS survival in multivariable analysis. These results suggest that the definition of R1-resection should be limited to true invasion of the section plane.

Isolated local recurrence or solitary solid organ metastasis after esophagectomy for cancer is not the end of the road.

Recurrent disease after esophagectomy bears an infaust prognosis, especially when multiple recurrences are present. But little is known about survival in patients with limited recurrence (solitary locoregional recurrence or solid organ metastasis). Herein, we report our experience with these subgroups. We analyzed 1754 consecutive patients surgically treated with curative resection for esophageal cancer and cancer of the gastroesophageal junction between 1990 and 2012. Seven subgroups were defined according to the recurrence type (locoregional vs. organ metastasis), the site of recurrence (abdominal, thoracic, cervical for lymph nodes and lung, liver, adrenals and others for organ metastasis) and also the number of lesions (one vs. multiple lymph node stations or organ metastasis) Of these groups; clinical isolated locoregional recurrence (ciLR) was defined as solitary lymph-node recurrence confined to one compartment (cervical, thoracic or abdominal, within or outside surgical dissection-field) at clinical staging. Clinical solitary solid organ metastasis (csSOM) was defined as metastasis in a resectable solid organ, i.e. liver, lung, brain or adrenal. Salvage therapies were grouped in five categories. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to calculate survival. Recurrent disease was observed in 766 patients (43.7%) with overall 5-year survival of 4.5% after diagnosis of recurrence. Fifty-seven patients (7.4%) showed ciLR and 110 (14.4%) csSOM. Median time-to-recurrence was 16.8 months in ciLR and 9.9 months in csSOM (P = 0.0074). Survival is significantly improved compared to supportive therapy when local therapy is possible (P < 0.0001). In 25 (15%) of ciLR or csSOM patients, surgical therapy with or without systemic therapy, yielded a 5-year survival of 49.9% (median 54.8 months) after diagnosis of recurrence. When surgery was impossible or contraindicated, the combination of chemoradiotherapy appeared to be superior to chemotherapy alone (respectively 27.0% vs. 4.6% 5-year survival) or radiotherapy alone (no 5-year survival). Recurrent disease after esophagectomy is a common problem with poor overall survival. However prolonged survival could be obtained in selected patients if the recurrent disease is limited to ciLR or csSOM, if surgery (+/- systemic therapy) can be performed. If not a combination of chemoradiotherapy seems to offer the second best option. Patients presenting with a ciLR or csSOM should be discussed in a dedicated multidisciplinary team meeting as to evaluate and define the place of salvage treatment which in well selected cases could offer a perspective of prolonged survival.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation treatment followed by surgery for esophageal cancer: there is much more than the mandard tumor regression score.

OBJECTIVE: Tumor regression grading (TRG) systems categorize residual tumor volume on the primary tumor after neoadjuvant treatment. Aim was to evaluate the impact of Mandard TRG, residual tumor depth (ypT) and residual lymph node status (ypN) and extent (ELNI) i.e. intracapsular versus extracapsular involvement on overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in esophageal carcinoma. METHODS: Between 2005 and 2014, 344 patients receiving R0-esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT) were selected. Mandard TRG, ypTN and ELNI were prospectively recorded. RESULTS: Mandard TRG1 was found in 110 (32%); TRG2 in 120 (35%); TRG3 in 53 (15%); TRG4 in 54 (16%) and TRG5 in 7 (2%) patients. Both OS and DFS showed no significant difference between TRG1 and 2 (p = 0.059 and 0.105, respectively). Therefore, TRG1/2 was classified together as 'major response', TRG3/4 as 'minor response' and TRG5 as 'no response'. Multivariate analysis showed two independent prognosticators for OS (tumor regression response (TRR) and number of positive lymph nodes) and three independent prognosticators for DFS (TRR, ypT and ELNI). CONCLUSION: After nCRT followed by surgery for esophageal carcinoma, number of residual positive lymph nodes as well as TRR are prognosticators for OS. Minor TRR, ypT and extracapsular lymph node invasion are prognosticators for recurrence.

Single-centre 20-year experience with surgical treatment of thymic tumours.

BACKGROUND: Large single-centre institutional series on thymic tumours are rare. Complete resection remains the mainstay of successful treatment. Characteristics and survival were reviewed in all patients treated between 1993-2013. METHODS: Hospital databases revealed 134 patients with pathologically-proven thymic tumour. Follow-up (median 63 months) was through patient notes and telephone contact with general practitioner. RESULTS: Patients were classified in Masaoka-Koga stages: I: 50 (37%); IIa: 14 (10%); IIb: 14 (10%); III: 27 (20%); IVa: 19 (14%); IVb: 4 (3%); unknown: 6 (5%). According to WHO classification, pathological subtypes were A: 19 (14%); AB: 25 (19%); B1: 21 (16%); B2: 31 (23%); B3: 15 (11%); thymic carcinoma: 23 (17%). Parathymic syndromes were diagnosed in 45 patients : myasthenia gravis (84%); pure red-cell aplasia (4%); hypogammaglobulinemia (2%); and others. 124 patients (93%) underwent surgery with complete resection in 104 (84%). Surgical approach was: sternotomy: 79; thoracotomy: 35; cervicotomy: 2; other/unknown: 8. In 73 patients (59%) no biopsy was taken prior to surgical resection, 25 were treated with induction chemotherapy, 36 received adjuvant radiotherapy. Hospital mortality was 0.81%. 35 patients died during follow-up (13 of tumour or treatment-related causes). Overall and recurrence-free survival at 5, 10, and 15 years were 86%; 64%; 47% and 67%; 49%; and 31%, respectively and were significantly (p < 0.01) different according to Masaoka-Koga stage. There was a significant association between WHO classification and Masaoka-Koga stages I-IIa-IIb versus III-IVa-IVb (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Operability and complete resectability of thymic tumours in our experience is high resulting in prolonged overall and recurrence-free survival. Masaoka-Koga stage is an important predictor for survival and shows a significant association with WHO classification.

Single-Centre 20-Year Experience with Surgical Treatment of Thymic Tumours.

BACKGROUND: Large single-centre institutional series on thymic tumours are rare. Complete resection remains the mainstay of successful treatment. Characteristics and survival were reviewed in all patients treated between 19932013. METHODS: Hospital databases revealed 134 patients with pathologically-proven thymic tumour. Follow-up (median 63 months) was through patient notes and telephone contact with general practitioner. RESULTS: Patients were classified in Masaoka-Koga stages: I: 50 (37%); Ila: 14 (10%); lib: 14 (10%); III: 27 (20%); IVa: 19 (14%); IVb: 4 (3%); unknown: 6 (5%). According to WHO classification, pathological subtypes were A: 19 (14%); AB: 25 (19%); B1: 21 (16%); B2: 31 (23%); B3: 15 (11%); thymic carcinoma: 23 (17%). Parathymic syndromes were diagnosed in 45 patients: myasthenia gravis (84%); pure red-cell aplasia (4%); hypogammaglobulinemia (2%); and others. 124 patients (93%) underwent surgery with complete resection in 104 (84%). Surgical approach was: sternotomy: 79; thoracotomy: 35; cervicotomy: 2; other/unknown: 8. In 73 patients (59%) no biopsy was taken prior to surgical resection, 25 were treated with induction chemotherapy, 36 received adjuvant radiotherapy. Hospital mortality was 0.81%. 35 patients died during follow-up (13 of tumour or treatment-related causes). Overall and recurrence-free survival at 5, 10, and 15 years were 86%; 64%; 47% and 67%; 49%; and 31%, respectively and were significantly (p < 0.01) different according to Masaoka-Koga stage. There was a significant association between WHO classification and Masaoka-Koga stages I-IIa-IIb versus III-IVa-IVb (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Operability and complete resectability of thymic tumours in our experience is high resulting in prolonged overall and recurrence-free survival. Masaoka-Koga stage is an important predictor for survival and shows a significant association with WHO classification.

Lobar lung transplantation from deceased donors: a valid option for small-sized patients with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Small-sized patients with cystic fibrosis usually face long waiting times for a suitable lung donor. Reduced-size lung transplantation (LTx) was promoted to shorten waiting times. We compared donor and recipient characteristics and outcome in lobar ([L]) versus full-size ([FS]) lung recipients. METHODS: Between July 1, 1991, and February 28, 2011, 535 isolated LTx were performed, including 74 in cystic fibrosis patients (8 L, 66 FS). Patients were followed up until September 2012. RESULTS: [L] recipients were younger, smaller, and lighter. Sex, waiting times, and donor data (age, sex, height, weight, PaO2/FiO2, and ventilation time) were comparable. Cardiopulmonary bypass was used more often in [L]; cold ischemia was comparable for first lung but longer in [L] for second lung; implantation times were comparable. In-hospital mortality rate was 0% in [L] versus 3% in [FS]. Both intensive care unit and hospital stay were longer in [L]. Grade 3 primary graft dysfunction was more pronounced in [L] at T0 and at T48. FEV1 increased significantly in both groups from preoperative value. Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome was absent in [L] and diagnosed in 18 patients in [FS], accounting for 6 of 15 late deaths. All [L] are still alive. No differences in survival were found between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although hindered by a higher incidence of primary graft dysfunction, L-LTx is a viable option with excellent survival and pulmonary function comparable to FS-LTx.

Combined liver and lung transplantation with extended normothermic lung preservation in a patient with end-stage emphysema complicated by drug-induced acute liver failure.

Isolated lung transplantation (LuTx) and liver transplantation are established treatments for irreversible lung and liver failure. Combined liver and lung transplantation (cLiLuTx) is a less common, but approved therapy of combined organ failure, mostly applied in patients suffering from progressive cystic fibrosis and advanced liver disease. We report a patient who was listed for LuTx due to end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and who developed drug-induced acute hepatic failure. The only therapeutic option was hyper-urgent cLiLuTx. To correct the poor coagulation in order to reduce the per-operative risk of bleeding, the liver was transplanted first. In anticipation of the longer lung preservation time, cold flushed lungs were preserved on a portable lung perfusion device for ex vivo normothermic perfusion for 11 h 15 min, transplanted sequentially off-pump, and reperfused after a total ex vivo time of 13 h 32 min and 16 h for the first and second lung, respectively. Ten months later, the patient is doing well and no rejection occurred. Normothermic ex vivo lung perfusion may help to prolong preservation time, facilitating long-distance transport and combined organ transplantation.

Acute femoral neuropathy: a rare complication after renal transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: Femoral neuropathy is a rare but disabling complication following renal transplantation and pelvic surgery in general. In a retrospective review, we analyzed the incidence, clinical presentation, and outcome of this complication after renal transplantation in our center. In addition, we conducted a literature search on this complication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five cases of isolated femoral neuropathy after renal transplantation were encountered at our center, out of 3,448 renal transplantations performed over a 47-year period. RESULTS: All of these patients presented with a weakness of hip flexion (iliopsoas muscle) and knee extension (quadriceps muscle) starting immediately after surgery. Atrophy of the quadriceps became apparent in severe and prolonged cases. In addition, numbness and paresthesia located in the anteromedial part of the thigh were present in 3 patients. CONCLUSION: Isolated neuropathy of the femoral nerve is a rare but disabling complication after renal transplantation. The etiology of isolated femoral neuropathy often results from direct compression of the femoral nerve or from indirect compression on the psoas muscle by application of self-retaining retractors placed during pelvic surgery. Other factors that can play a role in the pathogenesis are related to direct ischemia of the nerve by clamping of the iliac artery, thus interrupting the pelvic blood supply to the femoral nerve during the vascular anastomosis or vessel dissection, or by postoperative hematoma in the retroperitoneum or psoas muscle. Meticulous surgery and careful positioning of the self-retaining retractors during surgery are pivotal to avoid this complication which transplant surgeons should be aware of.

Jaw claudication as a result of carotid artery disease.

INTRODUCTION: Jaw claudication is mostly described as a symptom of giant cell arteritis. However it can also occur in presence of severe bilateral external carotid artery stenosis. REPORT: An 87-year-old man with extensive cardiovascular history presented with disabling bilateral jaw claudication. Duplex Scan and MR-Angiography showed severe bilateral ostial external carotid artery stenosis. After unilateral carotid endarterectomy, the symptoms disappeared. DISCUSSION: Bilateral jaw claudication as a symptom of carotid atherosclerosis is a rare condition. It can be treated by unilateral carotid endarterectomy.