CHART: a novel system for detector evaluation against toxic chemical aerosols.

Concern over the possibility of deliberate dispersion of chemical warfare agents and highly toxic pharmaceutical based agents as persistent aerosols has raised the need for experimental assessment of current and future defensive capabilities of armed forces and law enforcement agencies. Therefor we herewith present the design, realization and validation of the Chemical Hot Aerosol Research Tool (CHART) as a validated and safe experimental set-up for performance evaluation of chemical detection and identification equipment against chemical warfare agents and other highly toxic compounds. In the CHART liquid and solid compounds in solution or suspension are being dispersed as aerosols in a nebulization chamber. A broad dynamic particle size range can be generated, including particles known to be able to reach the lower respiratory tract. The aerosol generated is presented to the detection system-under-test while being monitored and characterized in real-time, using an optical particle counter and a time-of-flight aerosol analyzer, respectively. Additionally, the chemical composition of the aerosol is ex situ measured by analytical chemical methods. Evidently, in the design of the CHART significant emphasis was placed on laboratory safety and containment of toxic chemicals. The CHART presented in this paper has proven to be an indispensable experimental tool to study detectors and fieldable identification equipment against toxic chemical aerosols.

Real-time characterization of chemical threat agent aerosols for improvement of inhalation studies.

OBJECTIVES: Deliberate or accidental release of chemical treat agents in the aerosol form can cause an inhalation hazard. Since the relationship between aerosol properties and health hazards is poorly understood, research into the toxicological consequences of exposure to aerosols is needed. The aim of the present study was to improve the characterization of particles for inhalation studies. METHODS: Several aerosol measurement technologies were compared for their potential to physically and chemically characterize particles in the inhalation size range in real-time. For that purpose, we compared the performance of an aerodynamic particle sizer (APS), a scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS) and an electrical low-pressure impactor (ELPI) in an experimental set-up in which particles were generated by a Collison nebulizer and subsequently delivered into a nose-only inhalation exposure system. RESULTS: We found that more than 95% of the number of particles, equating to more than 83% of the mass generated by the 6-jet Collison nebulizer, were below 0.5 µm. To characterize the entire size range, the APS as single detector has only limited value, therefore the addition of supplementary instrumentation such as the SMPS or the ELPI is required. After real-time measurements in the size range of 30 nm to 10 µm, ex-situ chromatographic chemical analysis is essential for quantification of the delivered mass concentration. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, the present work demonstrates the utility of the ELPI technology, in combination with off-line analysis, for characterizing aerosols with various size, shape, charge, and composition. This makes the aerosol generation and analysis suite described a promising tool for quantitative inhalation exposure studies.

Multiple analysis techniques were applied for real-time aerosol characterizationAerosol size distributions are characterized for inhalation exposure studies.Analytical analysis following ELPI measurements is essential for mass quantification.

Heat sterilisation dramatically reduces filter efficiency of the majority of FFP2 and KN-95 respirators.

BACKGROUND: Because of the enormous demand for personal protective equipment and especially respiratory protective devices (respirators) during the initial phase of the corona pandemic shortages arose. Sterilisation of used respirators can reduce these shortages. In our study, respirator testing was carried out after only one sterilisation cycle. AIM: To determine if steam sterilisation and reuse could be safely applied for used respirators. METHODS: In a cabinet an aqueous solution of NaCl (0.02% w/v) was nebulized and passed through a sample of the material of a respirator. Passing particle concentrations were measured directly from the cabinet and via the filter material of the respirator for particles ≥ 0.3 µm, ≥ 0.5 µm and ≥ 1.0 µm. FINDINGS: only three out of ten steam sterilised respirators met the requirements of 94% filtration efficiency. CONCLUSION: The results prove that heat sterilisation cannot be generically applied for reuse of respirators safely.