Evaluation of an alternate dosing strategy for cisplatin in patients with extreme body surface area values.

PURPOSE: The majority of cytotoxic drugs for adults are dosed based on body surface area (BSA), aiming to reduce interpatient variability in drug exposure. We prospectively studied the usefulness of BSA-based dosing of cisplatin in patients at extremes of BSA values. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive a fixed dose of cisplatin in course 1, and a BSA-adjusted dose in course 2, or vice versa. The fixed dose was based on the average BSA for males and females, while extremes were set at BSA values exceeding the average +/- 1 standard deviation. Subsequently, we retrospectively analyzed data from a normal population. RESULTS: In 25 patients assessable for both courses, the use of a fixed dose of cisplatin resulted in reduced exposure to unbound platinum in patients at the upper extremes of BSA (P = .003) and higher exposures in patients at the lower extremes (P = .009), as compared with exposures following the BSA-adjusted dose. Although clearance was related to BSA (R2 = 0.44; P < .001), only a small reduction in interpatient variability in clearance after correction for BSA was achieved (20.8% v 17.1%). In the retrospective analysis, compared with the average patient, the clearance of unbound platinum in patients with a BSA value < or = 1.65 m2 was 16% slower (P < .001), while an 18% faster clearance (P < .001) was observed in patients with a BSA value > or = 2.05 m2. CONCLUSION Unless better predictors for platinum clearance are identified, fixed-dose regimens per BSA cluster (< or = 1.65 m2; 1.66 m2 to 2.04 m2; > or = 2.05 m2) are recommended.

Red blood cells: a neglected compartment in topotecan pharmacokinetic analysis.

Previously, a gender dependency of topotecan was found in the pharmacokinetics in the plasma compartment. Here, we prospectively studied the red blood cell (RBC) partitioning of topotecan and evaluated its consequences for overall drug disposition. Blood samples were obtained from 12 patients receiving cisplatin followed by i.v. topotecan. Topotecan pharmacokinetic analysis was performed in whole blood, plasma and RBCs. Significantly slower clearance was noted in females (n=7) compared to males (n=5) for lactone and total topotecan in plasma (p<0.0001), and for total drug in RBCs (p=0.027), but not in whole blood. In addition, no gender-dependent differences were observed in the terminal half-lives of topotecan in any of the compartments. The area under the curve ratios for RBC total to plasma lactone were 2.53+/-0.0640 and 2.13+/-0.442 in males and females, respectively. Hence, topotecan displays preferential affinity for RBCs compared to plasma, although these cells do not act as a depot in which drug accumulates over time. RBCs thus play a principal role in the distribution kinetics of topotecan and have a major impact on its plasma pharmacokinetics. The data warrant a change from current practice in pharmacokinetic studies with this agent and provide further evidence that, in general, the choice of the appropriate assay matrix should be rationally based.

Disposition of docosahexaenoic acid-paclitaxel, a novel taxane, in blood: in vitro and clinical pharmacokinetic studies.

PURPOSE: Docosahexaenoic acid-paclitaxel is as an inert prodrug composed of the natural fatty acid DHA covalently linked to the C2'-position of paclitaxel (M. O. Bradley et al., Clin. Cancer Res., 7: 3229-3238, 2001). Here, we examined the role of protein binding as a determinant of the pharmacokinetic behavior of DHA-paclitaxel. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The blood distribution of DHA-paclitaxel was studied in vitro using equilibrium dialysis and in 23 cancer patients receiving the drug as a 2-h i.v. infusion (dose, 200-1100 mg/m(2)). RESULTS: In vitro, DHA-paclitaxel was found to bind extensively to human plasma (99.6 +/- 0.057%). The binding was concentration independent (P = 0.63), indicating a nonspecific, nonsaturable process. The fraction of unbound paclitaxel increased from 0.052 +/- 0.0018 to 0.055 +/- 0.0036 (relative increase, 6.25%; P = 0.011) with an increase in DHA-paclitaxel concentration (0-1000 microg/ml), suggesting weakly competitive drug displacement from protein-binding sites. The mean (+/- SD) area under the curve of unbound paclitaxel increased nonlinearly with dose from 0.089 +/- 0.029 microg.h/ml (at 660 mg/m(2)) to 0.624 +/- 0.216 microg.h/ml (at 1100 mg/m(2)), and was associated with the dose-limiting neutropenia in a maximum-effect model (R(2) = 0.624). A comparative analysis indicates that exposure to Cremophor EL and unbound paclitaxel after DHA-paclitaxel (at 1100 mg/m(2)) is similar to that achieved with paclitaxel on clinically relevant dose schedules. CONCLUSIONS: Extensive binding to plasma proteins may explain, in part, the unique pharmacokinetic profile of DHA-paclitaxel described previously with a small volume of distribution ( approximately 4 liters) and slow systemic clearance ( approximately 0.11 liters/h).

Preclinical evaluation of alternative pharmaceutical delivery vehicles for paclitaxel.

New solubilizers, including Sorporol 230, Sorporol 120Ex, Aceporol 345-T, Aceporol 460 and Riciporol 335, as potential new delivery vehicles for paclitaxel were investigated, since recent studies have shown that the paclitaxel delivery vehicle Cremophor EL significantly alters the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel. Cremophor EL and Tween 80 were used as a reference. As in the case of Cremophor EL, alteration of blood distribution of paclitaxel occurred in the presence of all tested vehicles. Also, no differences in the affinity of paclitaxel for the tested solubilizers was found during equilibrium dialysis experiments. The different vehicles could be distinguished by a different rate of esterase-mediated breakdown, which was correlated with the fatty acid content of the solubilizers. The activation of the complement cascade was less pronounced for all solubilizers, except Riciporol 335, compared to Cremophor EL. The strategies presented here provide the possibility to rapidly screen future candidate delivery vehicles with optimal characteristics for use as a solubilizer in clinical formulations of paclitaxel or other poorly water-soluble drugs.

Urinary and fecal excretion of topotecan in patients with malignant solid tumours.

PURPOSE: The objectives of the study were to determine the pharmacokinetics and routes of excretion of topotecan following intravenous or oral administration to patients with refractory solid tumours. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive either oral (2.3 mg/m(2)) or intravenous (1.5 mg/m(2)) topotecan once daily for 5 days in course 1. Patients who received in course 1 oral topotecan received in course 2 intravenous topotecan on day 1 followed by oral topotecan on days 2 to 5. Patients who received in course 1 intravenous topotecan received in course 2 oral topotecan once daily for 5 days. Plasma pharmacokinetics were performed on day 1 of course 1 (all patients) and course 2 (only patients receiving intravenous topotecan on that day). In course 1, urine and feces were collected for up to 9 days after the first dosage. The amounts of topotecan and N-desmethyl topotecan in plasma, urine and feces were determined by validated high-performance liquid chromatographic assays. RESULTS: A total of 11 patients were enrolled in the study. Nine patients were evaluable for pharmacokinetics. Plasma pharmacokinetics were similar to those previously reported. The principal route of excretion was the urine, with approximately 49% of the intravenously administered topotecan dose and 20% of the oral dose collected in the urine as parent drug. Approximately 18% and 33% of the intravenous and oral dose, respectively, were recovered unchanged in the feces. Only small amounts of N-desmethyl topotecan were found in the excreta. CONCLUSIONS: Fecal and urinary excretion of unchanged topotecan were the major routes of topotecan elimination. Approximately 28% of the intravenous dose and 43% of the oral dose of topotecan were unaccounted for and eliminated through other routes.

Influence of Cremophor El on the bioavailability of intraperitoneal paclitaxel.

It has been hypothesized that the paclitaxel vehicle Cremophor EL (CrEL) is responsible for nonlinear drug disposition by micellar entrapment. To gain further insight into the role of CrEL in taxane pharmacology, we studied the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel in the presence and absence of CrEL after i.p. and i.v. dosing. Patients received an i.p. tracer dose of [G-(3)H]paclitaxel in ethanol without CrEL (100 microCi diluted further in isotonic saline) on day 1, i.p. paclitaxel formulated in CrEL (Taxol; 125 mg/m(2)) on day 4, an i.v. tracer of [G-(3)H]paclitaxel on day 22, and i.v. Taxol (175 mg/m(2)) on day 24. Four patients (age range, 54-74 years) were studied, and serial plasma samples up to 72 h were obtained and analyzed for total radioactivity, paclitaxel, and CrEL. In the presence of CrEL, i.v. paclitaxel clearance was 10.2 +/- 3.76 liters/h/m(2) (mean +/- SD), consistent with previous findings. The terminal disposition half-life was substantially prolonged after i.p. dosing (17.0 +/- 11.3 versus 28.7 +/- 8.72 h), as was the mean residence time (7.28 +/- 2.76 versus 40.7 +/- 13.8 h). The bioavailability of paclitaxel was 31.4 +/- 5.18%, indicating insignificant systemic concentrations after i.p. treatment. CrEL levels were undetectable after i.p. dosing (<0.05 microl/ml), whereas after i.v. dosing, the mean clearance was 159 +/- 58.4 ml/h/m(2), in line with earlier observations. In the absence of CrEL, the bioavailability and systemic concentrations of i.p. paclitaxel were significantly increased. This finding is consistent with the postulated concept that CrEL is largely responsible for the pharmacokinetic advantage for peritoneal cavity exposure to total paclitaxel compared with systemic delivery.

Determination of topotecan in human whole blood and unwashed erythrocytes by high-performance liquid chromatography.

A reversed-phase HPLC method for the quantitative determination of total topotecan in human whole blood and unwashed erythrocytes has been developed and validated in terms of sensitivity, specificity, precision and accuracy. Linear calibration curves were constructed in the range of 0.20 to 50.0 ng/ml. The sample pre-treatment for whole blood involved a two-step extraction with methanol and perchloric acid. Prior to extraction, erythrocytes were separated from other blood components by centrifugation in MESED instruments. Separations were achieved on an Inertsil ODS-80A analytical column (150x4.6 mm, 5 microm particle size), eluted at 50 degrees C and a flow-rate of 1.00 ml/min, with a mixture of 100 mM ammonium acetate (pH 6.0)-tetrahydrofuran (94.6:5.4, v/v). Fluorescence detection was performed using excitation and emission wavelengths of 381 and 525 nm, respectively. With the applied method, 80% of topotecan was extracted out of whole blood. The lower limit of quantitation in whole blood was established at 0.20 ng/ml with within-run and between-run precisions, respectively, ranging from 1.7 to 9.3% and 1.5-6.1%, while the accuracy ranged from 100 to 113%. The described method will be used in clinical studies to explore the role of erythrocytes in the overall kinetic behavior of topotecan.

Comparative pharmacokinetics of unbound paclitaxel during 1- and 3-hour infusions.

PURPOSE: The paclitaxel vehicle Cremophor EL (CrEL) profoundly influences the cellular distribution of paclitaxel in human blood in vitro by a concentration-dependent decrease of the unbound drug fraction. Because CrEL clearance increases by extending the infusion duration from 3 to 24 hours, we hypothesized that exposure to unbound paclitaxel might also be schedule-dependent. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CrEL and unbound paclitaxel pharmacokinetics were prospectively analyzed in 29 patients with advanced solid tumors treated with paclitaxel 100 mg/m(2) given as a 1-hour (n = 15) or 3-hour (n = 14) intravenous infusion. RESULTS: The systemic exposure (area under the curve [AUC]) to CrEL was significantly higher with the 1-hour as compared with the 3-hour schedule (80.2 +/- 24.2 v. 48.5 +/- 24.1 microL x h/mL; P =.002). In contrast, the AUC of unbound paclitaxel was substantially reduced after the 1-hour infusion (0.50 +/- 0.10 v. 0.62 +/- 0.12 micromol/L x h; P =.009). Similarly, clearance and volume of distribution were significantly dependent on infusion duration (P <.005). A trend was observed toward more severe hematologic toxicity with the 3-hour schedule (P =.053), consistent with increased exposure to unbound drug. CONCLUSION: Overall, these findings explain, at least in part, previous observations that short-infusion schedules of paclitaxel lack significant myelotoxicity, whereas potentially CrEL-related side effects, including peripheral neuropathy, are augmented.