ABSTRACT
Introduction: Post-stroke fatigue is frequently present in young adults, but its underlying mechanism is still unclear. The aim of the study was to investigate the association between lesion location, network efficiency and chronic post-stroke fatigue based on voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping and structural network connectivity analysis. Patients and Methods: One hundred and thirty five young patients, aged 18-50 years, with a first-ever transient ischemic attack or cerebral infarction from the Follow-Up of Transient ischemic attack and stroke patients and Unelucidated Risk factor Evaluation (FUTURE) study, underwent 1.5T MRI and were assessed for fatigue using the self-report Checklist Individual Strength. Stroke lesions were manually segmented, and structural network efficiency was calculated using the diffusion MRI-based brain networks and graph theory for each patient. Univariate and multivariate analyses was performed to study the associations between MRI parameters and chronic post-stroke fatigue. In addition, we used voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping to analyze the relationship between the lesion location and chronic post-stroke fatigue. Results: Mean age at index event was 39.0 years (SD ± 8.2), and mean follow-up duration was 11.0 years (SD ± 8.0). 50 patients (37%) had post-stroke fatigue. Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping showed no significant relation between stroke lesions and the presence of chronic post-stroke fatigue. Furthermore, there were no significant associations between the lesion size or network efficiency, and the presence of chronic post-stroke fatigue. Discussion: We did not find any association between stroke characteristics (lesion location and size) and chronic post-stroke fatigue (CIS20-R), nor associations between structural brain network connectivity and post-stroke fatigue on the long term in young stroke patients.
ABSTRACT
Background: In Paralympic sports, classification of athletes based on the impact of impairments on the ability to perform is needed, to prevent a one-sided and predictable outcome of the competition in which the least impaired athlete has the best chance to win. Classification is developing from expert opinion based to evidence based. In wheelchair court sports, there is evidence to support the impact of impairment on wheeled mobility, but not on ball handling. To assess the impact of impairment on the ability to perform ball-handling activities, standardised tests for ball handling are needed. Purpose: To assess if reliable and valid standardised tests for the measurement of ball-handling proficiency in a wheelchair or able-bodied court sports exist; to assist in the development of Evidence-Based Classification (EBC) in wheelchair court sports according to the guidelines of the International Paralympic Committee (IPC). Methods: The review was conducted according to the Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) statement. Search terms used were "wheelchair," "ball," "ball sports," "test," and "performance." Databases searched were Medline, Embase, PubMed, and Sport Discus. Study quality was assessed using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklist. Results: Twenty-two articles were included. Foundational Movement Skills in ball-handling proficiency were assessed. Tests for throwing maximal distance showed sufficient reliability and validity. Precision in throwing showed low-to-moderate reliability and conflicting results in validity. Throwing techniques differed between studies. Dribbling the ball showed high reliability, but conflicting results in validity. Conclusions: Tests for throwing maximal distance, throwing precision, and dribbling the ball can be used in standardised tests for activity limitation in wheelchair court sports. However, tests need to be adapted and standardised and then reassessed for reliability and validity in athletes with and without arm impairment.
