REducing STEroids in Relapsing Nephrotic syndrome: the RESTERN study- protocol of a national, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority intervention study.

INTRODUCTION: Oral corticosteroids are the first-line treatment for idiopathic childhood nephrotic syndrome. Most children experience several relapses, needing repeated courses of corticosteroid therapy. This exposes them to side effects and long-term complications. For most patients, long-term prognosis is for complete resolution of the disease over time and maintenance of normal kidney function. Therefore, it is vital to focus on minimising adverse events of the disease and its therapy. Unfortunately, no randomised controlled trials are available to determine the optimal corticosteroid treatment of an infrequent relapse of nephrotic syndrome. Recent studies show that treatment schedules for the first episode can safely be shortened to 2 months. The hypothesis of the REducing STEroids in Relapsing Nephrotic syndrome (RESTERN) study is that a 4-week reduction of alternate-day steroids after inducing remission is effective and safe, reduces steroid exposure by 35% on average and is therefore preferable. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The RESTERN study is a nationwide, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority intervention study. Children aged 1-18 years with a relapse of steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome are eligible for this study. Study subjects (n=144) will be randomly assigned to either current standard therapy in the Netherlands or a reduced prednisolone schedule. The primary outcome of the RESTERN study is the time to first relapse after the final prednisolone dose. The secondary outcomes are the number or relapses, progression to frequent relapsing or steroid dependent nephrotic syndrome and the cumulative dosage of prednisolone during the study period. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This non-inferiority trial will be performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and has been approved by the medical ethical committee of Arnhem-Nijmegen and the Dutch Competent Authority (Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects, CCMO). After completion of this study, results will be published in national and international peer-reviewed scientific journals. Papers will be published according to CCMO guidelines. The final report will be made available to trial participants. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR5670, EudraCT no 2016-002430-76.

Complement activation patterns in atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome during acute phase and in remission.

Atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS) is associated with (genetic) alterations in alternative complement pathway. Nevertheless, comprehensive evidence that the complement system in aHUS patients is more prone to activation is still lacking. Therefore, we performed a thorough analysis of complement activation in acute phase and in remission of this disease. Complement activation patterns of the aHUS patients in acute phase and in remission were compared to those of healthy controls. Background levels of complement activation products C3b/c, C3bBbP and terminal complement complex (TCC) were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) plasma. In vitro-triggered complement activation in serum samples was studied using zymosan-coating and pathway-specific assay. Furthermore, efficiencies of the C3b/c, C3bBbP and TCC generation in fluid phase during spontaneous activation were analysed. Patients with acute aHUS showed elevated levels of C3b/c (P < 0·01), C3bBbP (P < 0·0001) and TCC (P < 0·0001) in EDTA plasma, while values of patients in remission were normal, compared to those of healthy controls. Using data from a single aHUS patient with complement factor B mutation we illustrated normalization of complement activation during aHUS recovery. Serum samples from patients in remission showed normal in vitro patterns of complement activation and demonstrated normal kinetics of complement activation in the fluid phase. Our data indicate that while aHUS patients have clearly activated complement in acute phase of the disease, this is not the case in remission of aHUS. This knowledge provides important insight into complement regulation in aHUS and may have an impact on monitoring of these patients, particularly when using complement inhibition therapy.

Living kidney transplantation in adult patients with atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Dysregulation of complement activation is the most common cause of the atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome (aHUS). Many patients with aHUS develop end-stage renal disease and consider kidney transplantation. However, the recurrence rate after transplantation ranges from 45-90% in patients with known abnormalities in circulating complement proteins. It was recently proposed that patients with aHUS should be treated prophylactically with plasma exchange or eculizumab to prevent recurrence after transplantation. METHODS: A case series describing the successful outcome of kidney transplantation without prophylactic therapy in four adult patients with aHUS and a high risk of disease recurrence. Patients received a living donor kidney and immunosuppression consisting of basiliximab induction, low-dose tacrolimus, prednisone and mycophenolate mofetil. Patients received a statin, and were targeted to a low blood pressure preferably using blockers of the renin-angiotensin system. RESULTS: After a follow-up of 16-21 months, none of the patients developed recurrent aHUS. Also, no rejection was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Kidney transplantation in adult patients with aHUS can be successful without prophylactic eculizumab, using a protocol that minimises cold ischaemia time, reduces the risk of rejection and provides endothelial protection. Our data suggest that in patients with aHUS, controlled trials are needed to demonstrate the optimal strategy.

A new era in the diagnosis and treatment of atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome.

The haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS) is characterised by haemolytic anaemia, thrombocytopenia and acute renal failure. The majority of cases are seen in childhood and are preceded by an infection with Shiga-like toxin producing Escherichia coli (STEC-HUS; so-called typical HUS). Non-STEC or atypical HUS (aHUS) is seen in 5 to 10% of all cases and occurs at all ages. These patients have a poorer outcome and prognosis than patients with STEC-HUS. New insights into the pathogenesis of aHUS were revealed by the identification of mutations in genes encoding proteins of the alternative pathway of the complement system in aHUS patients. Specific information of the causative mutation is important for individualised patient care with respect to choice and efficacy of therapy, the outcome of renal transplantation, and the selection of living donors. This new knowledge about the aetiology of the disease has stimulated the development of more specific treatment modalities. Until now, plasma therapy was used with limited success in aHUS, but recent clinical trials have demonstrated that patients with aHUS can be effectively treated with complement inhibitors, such as the monoclonal anti-C5 inhibitor eculizumab.

Rituximab in minimal change nephropathy and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: report of four cases and review of the literature.

Minimal change nephropathy (MCNS) and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) are the main causes of the idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. MCNS usually responds to steroids and the long-term prognosis is generally good. However, some patients require prolonged treatment with immunosuppressive agents. FSGS generally follows a less favourable course: patients do not always respond to steroids and may progress to end-stage renal disease. Recurrence of FSGS after renal transplantation is frequently observed and may result in graft loss. Recently, anecdotal case reports have described long-term resolution of nephrotic syndrome due to MCNS or FSGS after treatment with rituximab. We present four patients with nephrotic syndrome due to MCNS, FSGS or recurrence of FS GS after kidney transplantation, who were treated with rituximab with variable success. A review of the recent literature suggests that anti-CD20 antibodies may be a promising therapy, especially for patients with MCNS or idiopathic FSGS. Controlled studies are required to determine the efficacy of rituximab and to define which patients will benefit.

Is biopsy required prior to cyclophosphamide in steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome?

AIM: The present studywas designed to retrospectively evaluate the use of renal biopsies prior to cyclophosphamide therapy. The aim of the study was to determine in how many cases histological outcome of the biopsies had subsequently changed the decision to treat or refrain from treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1980 and September 2001, 85 children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) underwent a renal biopsy in the University Hospitals of Utrecht and Nijmegen before the start of an 8-week cyclophosphamide treatment. MCNS was suspected in all children because of the following criteria: edema, proteinuria, hypoalbuminemia, absence of macroscopic hematuria and in rare cases microscopic hematuria, no permanent hypertension, normal C3 serum level, a normal glomerular filtration rate as determined by creatinine clearance and age > 1 year. Cyclophosphamide therapy was indicated because of a frequently relapsing (FR) course of illness in 8 children, because of steroid dependence (SD) in 22 children and because of combined FR and SD in 55 children. Steroid-resistant children were excluded from this study. RESULTS: Histology confirmed the diagnosis MCNS in 84 out of 85 children. In addition to MCNS, IgA deposits were observed in renal specimens of 2 children. In 1 SD child, the initial diagnosis MCNS was changed 3 years later when a repeated biopsy showed progression into focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). CONCLUSION: In summary, no renal biopsy is required prior to cytotoxic therapy in children with uncomplicated steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome.