Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Scand J Prim Health Care ; 8(1): 19-23, 1990 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2356369

ABSTRACT

Five non-ophthalmologists (four general practitioners and a hospital physician) assessed the retinal status of 62 patients with diabetes mellitus, using fundus photos. They had no particular interest in diabetic retinopathy, nor did they receive special training. Their diagnoses were compared with the diagnostic opinion of two ophthalmologists, whose diagnoses served as the standard. The use of reference charts (photos of normal retinas and retinas with diabetic retinopathy) reduced the number of false negative assessments. The sensitivity of the non-ophthalmologists varied between 100 per cent and 88 per cent, depending on the standard (diagnosis of one ophthalmologist or consensus between two ophthalmologists). The specificity was 55 percent, indicating the potentially high rate of inappropriate referral. The coefficient of agreement of diagnosis between the non-ophthalmologists and the ophthalmologists was kappa 0.54. All but one patient put on treatment by the ophthalmologists had been identified by the non-ophthalmologists. The possibility of fundus photography in patient management (consultation on photo reading instead of a referral of the patient) is discussed. It is concluded that the assessment of fundus photos to detect diabetic retinopathy by general physicians seems to be a promising strategy in the surveillance of patients with diabetes mellitus.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Diabetic Retinopathy/diagnosis , Fluorescein Angiography , Medical Staff, Hospital , Physicians, Family , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...