Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
J Invest Dermatol ; 122(2): 295-9, 2004 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15009708

ABSTRACT

Ultraviolet-radiation suppresses cell-mediated immunity in healthy humans. It has been postulated that, in the short term, this immunosuppression prevents autoimmune responses to ultraviolet-radiation damaged skin. Patients with polymorphic light eruption (PLE) demonstrate abnormal responses to ultraviolet-radiation suggestive of an immune response to an ultraviolet-radiation-induced antigen. We investigated whether PLE patients (n=22) were resistant to ultraviolet-radiation-induced immunosuppression compared to skin-type, aged-matched controls (n=23). Groups of patients and controls (six subjects per group) received a single dose of solar-simulated ultraviolet-radiation of either 0, 0.6, 1 or 2 minimal erythema doses (MED). Erythema was quantified using a reflectance meter and all volunteers were sensitised on the irradiated site with dinitrochlorobenzene. Contact hypersensitivity responses (CHS) to dinitrochlorobenzene were quantified after challenge using ultrasound. Ultraviolet-radiation-induced erythema was comparable in patients and controls. CHS was comparable in unirradiated patients and controls. UVR-induced a dose-dependent suppression of CHS in all volunteers but patients were more resistant to immunosuppression after 1MED. Exposure to 1MED suppressed CHS by 78% in controls but induced less suppression in patients (44%, p < 0.01). Our data suggest that PLE patients have a flaw in their immunoregulatory response to ultraviolet-radiation it is only apparent over a narrow dose range around 1 MED.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Irritant/immunology , Dermatitis, Photoallergic/immunology , Erythema/immunology , Ultraviolet Rays/adverse effects , Adult , Dinitrochlorobenzene , Female , Humans , Immunity, Cellular/immunology , Immunity, Cellular/radiation effects , Immunosuppression Therapy , Irritants , Male , Sunburn/immunology
3.
Arch Dermatol ; 140(3): 286-92, 2004 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15023772

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is controversy about the best method to induce polymorphic light eruption (PLE) experimentally. Objectives To review articles on PLE induction and design a UV radiation protocol that improves success rates with clinically relevant doses of environmentally relevant solar-simulated radiation (SSR). DESIGN AND SETTING: All articles on the experimental provocation of PLE published since 1980 were reviewed. Photoprovocation of lesions was studied in 25 PLE patients. The 24-hour minimal erythemal dose (MED) of SSR was determined. Thereafter, six 4 x 4-cm adjacent sites on previously affected and previously unaffected skin were exposed to 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.25, 1.5 MED of SSR for 3 to 4 consecutive days. The study periodwas autumn to spring in London, England (51 degrees north latitude). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Relationship between PLE induction and biological and physical exposure parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The review shows that fractionated erythemally effective UV-A exposures were more successful than single-sunburning UV-B doses. Photoprovocation of PLE was successful in 68% of patients after 2 to 3 SSR exposures that were not necessarily erythemal. There was no difference in success rate between previously affected and previously unaffected skin. Our data indicate that PLE is more likely to be induced when the natural causes of the disease are simulated.


Subject(s)
Photosensitivity Disorders/diagnosis , Skin Tests/standards , Ultraviolet Rays , Clinical Trials as Topic , Humans , Predictive Value of Tests , Radiation Dosage , Skin/radiation effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...