Effects of inverse methods and spike phases on interictal high-density EEG source reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of inverse methods and timepoints of interictal epileptic discharges (IEDs) used for high-density electric source imaging (hd-ESI) in pharmacoresistant focal epilepsies. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the hd-ESI and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18FDG-PET) of 21 operated patients with pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy (Engel I). Volumetric hd-ESI was performed with three different inverse methods such as the inverse solution linearly constrained minimum variance (LCMV, a beamformer method), standardized low resolution electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA) and weighted minimum-norm estimation (wMNE) and at different IED phases. Hd-ESI accuracy was determined by volumetric overlap and distance between hd-ESI source maximum, as well as 18FDG-PET hypometabolic region relative to the resection zone (RZ). RESULTS: In our cohort, the shortest distances and greatest volumetric overlaps to the RZ were found in the half-rise and peak-phase for all inverse methods. The distance to the RZ was not different between the centroid of the clinical hypothesis-based cluster and the source maximum in peak-phase. However, the distance of the hypothesis-based cluster was significantly shorter compared to the cluster selected by the smallest p-value. CONCLUSIONS: Hd-ESI provides the greatest accuracy in determining the RZ at the IED half-rise and peak-phase for all applied inverse methods, whereby sLORETA and LCMV were equally accurate. SIGNIFICANCE: Our results offer guidance in selecting inverse methods and IED phases for hd-ESI, compare the performance of hd-ESI and 18FDG-PET and encourage future studies in investigating the relationship between interictal ESI and 18FDG-PET hypometabolism.

Comparison of Resting-State EEG Network Analyses With and Without Parallel MRI in Genetic Generalized Epilepsy.

Genetic generalized epilepsy (GGE) is conceptualized as a brain disorder involving distributed bilateral networks. To study these networks, simultaneous EEG-fMRI measurements can be used. However, inside-MRI EEG suffers from strong MR-related artifacts; it is not established whether EEG-based metrics in EEG-fMRI resting-state measurements are suitable for the analysis of group differences at source-level. We evaluated the impact of the inside-MR measurement condition on statistical group comparisons of EEG on source-level power and functional connectivity in patients with GGE versus healthy controls. We studied the cross-modal spatial relation of statistical group differences in seed-based FC derived from EEG and parallel fMRI. We found a significant increase in power and a frequency-specific change in functional connectivity for the inside MR-scanner compared to the outside MR-scanner condition. For power, we found reduced group difference between GGE and controls both in terms of statistical significance as well as effect size. Group differences for ImCoh remained similar both in terms of statistical significance as well as effect size. We found increased seed-based FC for GGE patients from the thalamus to the precuneus cortex region in fMRI, and in the theta band of simultaneous EEG. Our findings suggest that the analysis of EEG functional connectivity based on ImCoh is suitable for MR-EEG, and that relative group difference in a comparison of patients with GGE against controls are preserved. Spatial correspondence of seed-based FC group differences between the two modalities was found for the thalamus.

Big Field of View MRI T1w and FLAIR Template - NMRI225.

Image templates are a common tool for neuroscience research. Often, they are used for spatial normalization of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data, which is a necessary procedure for analyzing brain morphology and function via voxel-based analysis. This allows the researcher to reduce individual shape differences across images and make inferences across multiple subjects. Many templates have a small field-of-view typically focussed on the brain, limiting the use for applications requiring detailed information about other extra-cranial structures in the head and neck area. However, there are several applications where such information is important, for example source reconstruction of electroencephalography (EEG) and/or magnetoencephalography (MEG). We have constructed a new template based on 225 T1w and FLAIR images with a big field-of-view that can serve both as target for across subject spatial normalization as well as a basis to build high-resolution head models. This template is based on and iteratively re-registered to the MNI152 space to provide maximal compatibility with the most commonly used brain MRI template.

Feasibility of high-density electric source imaging in the presurgical workflow: Effect of number of spikes and automated spike detection.

OBJECTIVE: Presurgical high-density electric source imaging (hdESI) of interictal epileptic discharges (IEDs) is only used by few epilepsy centers. One obstacle is the time-consuming workflow both for recording as well as for visual review. Therefore, we analyzed the effect of (a) an automated IED detection and (b) the number of IEDs on the accuracy of hdESI and time-effectiveness. METHODS: In 22 patients with pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy receiving epilepsy surgery (Engel 1) we retrospectively detected IEDs both visually and semi-automatically using the EEG analysis software Persyst in 256-channel EEGs. The amount of IEDs, the Euclidean distance between hdESI maximum and resection zone, and the operator time were compared. Additionally, we evaluated the intra-individual effect of IED quantity on the distance between hdESI maximum of all IEDs and hdESI maximum when only a reduced amount of IEDs were included. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the number of IEDs between visually versus semi-automatically marked IEDs (74 ± 56 IEDs/patient vs 116 ± 115 IEDs/patient). The detection method of the IEDs had no significant effect on the mean distances between resection zone and hdESI maximum (visual: 26.07 ± 31.12 mm vs semi-automated: 33.6 ± 34.75 mm). However, the mean time needed to review the full datasets semi-automatically was shorter by 275 ± 46 min (305 ± 72 min vs 30 ± 26 min, P < 0.001). The distance between hdESI of the full versus reduced amount of IEDs of the same patient was smaller than 1 cm when at least a mean of 33 IEDs were analyzed. There was a significantly shorter intraindividual distance between resection zone and hdESI maximum when 30 IEDs were analyzed as compared to the analysis of only 10 IEDs (P < 0.001). SIGNIFICANCE: Semi-automatized processing and limiting the amount of IEDs analyzed (~30-40 IEDs per cluster) appear to be time-saving clinical tools to increase the practicability of hdESI in the presurgical work-up.

Directionality of the injected current targeting the P20/N20 source determines the efficacy of 140 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)-induced aftereffects in the somatosensory cortex.

Interindividual anatomical differences in the human cortex can lead to suboptimal current directions and may result in response variability of transcranial electrical stimulation methods. These differences in brain anatomy require individualized electrode stimulation montages to induce an optimal current density in the targeted area of each individual subject. We aimed to explore the possible modulatory effects of 140 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on the somatosensory cortex using personalized multi-electrode stimulation montages. In two randomized experiments using either tactile finger or median nerve stimulation, we measured by evoked potentials the plasticity aftereffects and oscillatory power changes after 140 Hz tACS at 1.0 mA as compared to sham stimulation (n = 17, male = 9). We found a decrease in the power of oscillatory mu-rhythms during and immediately after tactile discrimination tasks, indicating an engagement of the somatosensory system during stimulus encoding. On a group level both the oscillatory power and the evoked potential amplitudes were not modulated by tACS neither after tactile finger stimulation nor after median nerve stimulation as compared to sham stimulation. On an individual level we could however demonstrate that lower angular difference (i.e., differences between the injected current vector in the target region and the source orientation vector) is associated with significantly higher changes in both P20/N20 and N30/P30 source activities. Our findings suggest that the higher the directionality of the injected current correlates to the dipole orientation the greater the tACS-induced aftereffects are.