Microbiology of septic arthritis in young Auckland children.

BACKGROUND: Kingella kingae is an important cause of septic arthritis in young children, with modern laboratory methods leading to increased detection. Prevalence of this pathogen in New Zealand, where there are high rates of childhood infections due to Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes, is not known. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of children <5 years with septic arthritis (without osteomyelitis) at a tertiary children's hospital in Auckland, over 10 years (2005-2014). Data were collected on demographics, microbiology, clinical presentation, investigations and management. RESULTS: Of the 68 cases of septic arthritis, 57 (83.8%) occurred in children aged <24 months. Among those <3 months, Streptococcus agalactiae (Group B streptococcus) was predominant (45.5% of 11 cases), followed by S. aureus (36.4%). The most common pathogen in those 3 to <12 months was Streptococcus pneumoniae (38.5% of 13 cases). In children aged 12 to <24 months, K. kingae was most common (30.3% of 33 cases). Of the 12 cases of K. kingae, 91.7% were identified from synovial fluid culture. All K. kingae isolates were susceptible to amoxicillin. CONCLUSIONS: K. kingae is the leading pathogen in septic arthritis in New Zealand children aged 12 to <24 months. Routine inoculation of synovial fluid into blood culture bottles at time of sample collection, in addition to use of polymerase chain reaction methods, should be encouraged to improve detection rates. For infants and preschool children presenting with single joint septic arthritis, empiric antibiotics should include cover for S. aureus and K. kingae.

The role of Kingella kingae in pre-school aged children with bone and joint infections.

OBJECTIVES: The Pre-school Osteoarticular Infection (POI) study aimed to describe the burden of disease, epidemiology, microbiology and treatment of acute osteoarticular infections (OAI) and the role of Kingella kingae in these infections. METHODS: Information about children 3-60 months of age who were hospitalized with an OAI to 11 different hospitals across Australia and New Zealand between January 2012 and December 2016 was collected retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 907 cases (73%) were included. Blood cultures grew a likely pathogen in only 18% (140/781). The peak age of presentation was 12 to 24 months (466/907, 51%) and Kingella kingae was the most frequently detected microorganism in this age group (60/466, 13%). In the majority of cases, no microorganism was detected (517/907, 57%). Addition of PCR to culture increased detection rates of K. kingae. However, PCR was performed infrequently (63/907, 7%). CONCLUSIONS: This large multi-national study highlights the need for more widespread use of molecular diagnostic techniques for accurate microbiological diagnosis of OAI in pre-school aged children. The data from this study supports the hypothesis that a substantial proportion of pre-school aged children with OAI and no organism identified may in fact have undiagnosed K. kingae infection. Improved detection of Kingella cases is likely to reduce the average length of antimicrobial treatment.

Paediatric trainee supervision: management changes and perceived education value.

AIM: Supervision in postgraduate training is an under-researched area. We measured the amount, type and effect of supervision on patient care and perceived education value in a general paediatric service. METHOD: We designed a structured observation form and questionnaire to document the type, duration and effect of supervision on patient management and perceived education value. RESULTS: Most supervision occurred without the paediatrician confirming the trainee's findings. Direct observation of the trainee was rare. Management was changed in 30% of patients seen on the inpatient ward round and in 42% of the patients discussed during the chart reviews but not seen by the paediatrician. Management was changed in 48% of the cases when the paediatrician saw the patient with the trainee in outpatients but in only 21% of patients when the patient was but not seen. Changes made to patient management, understanding and perceived education value, differed between inpatient and out patient settings. There was more impact when the paediatrician saw the patient with the trainee in outpatients; while for inpatients, the opposite was true. Trainees rated the value of the supervision more highly than their supervisors did. Trainees' comments on what they learnt from their supervisor related almost exclusively to clinical knowledge rather than professional behaviours. CONCLUSIONS: We observed little evidence of supervisors directly observing trainees and trainees learning professional behaviours. A review of supervisory practices to promote more effective learning is needed. Communicating to paediatricians the value their trainees place on their input could have a positive effect on their engagement in supervision.