Quantification of stress exposure in very preterm infants: Development of the NeO-stress score.

BACKGROUND: Stress during treatment at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) has long-term negative consequences on preterm infants' development. AIMS: We developed an instrument suited to validly determine the cumulative stress exposure for preterm infants in a NICU. STUDY DESIGN: This survey study made use of two consecutive questionnaires. SUBJECTS: NICU nurses and physicians from the nine NICUs in the Netherlands. OUTCOME MEASURES: First, respondents rated the relevance of 77 items encompassing potentially stressful procedures, commented on their comprehensibility and the comprehensiveness of the list. We calculated the content validity per item (CVI-I) and included only the relevant items in a second questionnaire in which the participants rated the stressfulness from 0 (not stressful) to 10 (extremely stressful). A stressfulness index - representing the median score - was calculated for each included item. RESULTS: Based on the CVI-I of the 77 items, step 1 resulted in 38 items considered relevant to quantify stress in preterm infants during the first 28 days of life. This list of 38 items exists of 34 items with a CVI-I if 0.78 or higher, one of these items was split into two items, and three items were added to improve comprehensiveness. The stressfulness index ranged from five to nine. CONCLUSIONS: The NeO-stress score consists of stressful items including their severity index and was developed to determine cumulative stress exposure of preterm infants. Evaluating the cross-cultural validity, correlating it to behavioural and biological stress responses, and evaluating its ability to predict preterm infants at risk for the negative effects following stress might expand the possibilities for this instrument.

[Glucocorticoid treatment in pregnancy; is caution the mother of wisdom?] / Behandeling met glucocorticoïden in de zwangerschap.

Timely prenatal, maternally administered, corticosteroids improve the outcome of preterm newborns. The general aim should therefore be optimal identification of actual imminent preterm birth to provide protection of all preterm infants that are at risk of a substantial level of post-natal morbidity. Unnecessary use of maternal corticosteroids by inadequate estimate of imminent preterm birth, now seems associated with mental and behavioural problems in the offspring during the life course, which calls for a more restricted use. Opportunities to reduce futile use of maternal corticosteroids in case of preterm birth might be found in better timing of administration, improved selection of women at risk and by potential restraint re-use at later gestational ages. Timing and selection can be further improved by the development of better (non-invasive) predictors to pinpoint those women who actual will deliver within 48 hours. Future prospective studies should provide additional evidence to improve antenatal corticosteroid administration.

Analgesics and Sedatives in Critically Ill Newborns and Infants: The Impact on Long-Term Neurodevelopment.

Inadequate pain and/or stress management in preterm- and term-born infants has been associated with increased morbidity and even mortality. However, exposure to analgosedatives during early infancy may also be one of the risk factors for subsequent neurodevelopmental impairment, at least in animal studies. Because infants admitted to neonatal or pediatric intensive care units may receive high amounts of these drugs for prolonged periods of time and the majority of these infants nowadays survive to discharge, this is of major concern. A balanced approach that incorporates the assessment and quantification of both wanted effects as well as unwanted side effects is therefore needed. In this article, the optimal dose determination of commonly used analgosedative drugs as well as their potential long-term effects on the developing human brain and neuropsychological functioning are reviewed.

Cerebellar Growth Impairment Characterizes School-Aged Children Born Preterm without Perinatal Brain Lesions.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Infants born preterm are commonly diagnosed with structural brain lesions known to affect long-term neurodevelopment negatively. Yet, the effects of preterm birth on brain development in the absence of intracranial lesions remain to be studied in detail. In this study, we aim to quantify long term consequences of preterm birth on brain development in this specific group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Neonatal cranial sonography and follow-up T1-weighted MR imaging and DTI were performed to evaluate whether the anatomic characteristics of the cerebrum and cerebellum in a cohort of school-aged children (6-12 years of age) were related to gestational age at birth in children free of brain lesions in the perinatal period. RESULTS: In the cohort consisting of 36 preterm (28-37 weeks' gestational age) and 66 term-born infants, T1-weighted MR imaging and DTI at 6-12 years revealed a reduction of cerebellar white matter volume (ß = 0.387, P < .001), altered fractional anisotropy of cerebellar white matter (ß = -0.236, P = .02), and a reduction of cerebellar gray and white matter surface area (ß = 0.337, P < .001; ß = 0.375, P < .001, respectively) in relation to birth age. Such relations were not observed for the cerebral cortex or white matter volume, surface area, or diffusion quantities. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study show that perinatal influences that are not primarily neurologic are still able to disturb long-term neurodevelopment, particularly of the developing cerebellum. Including the cerebellum in future neuroprotective strategies seems therefore essential.

Standard and individually determined thermal pain stimuli induce similar brain activations.

BACKGROUND: Several functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies use thermal pain stimuli to determine brain activation patterns during pain. Studies use either a standard temperature condition for all participants or an individualized temperature condition based on the individually determined pain threshold of the participant. The aim of the present study was to compare both conditions in the same participants. METHODS: Eighteen healthy participants (21-29 years) underwent four fMRI runs, in each of which they received three types of thermal stimuli: neutral (32 °C), warm (37 °C) and painfully hot. In two runs, the painfully hot stimulus was set at a standard temperature of 46 °C; in the other two runs, the temperature was set at the subject's individual pain threshold (46-48 °C). fMRI (blood oxygen level dependent) was performed on a 1.5 T MR scanner (GE Signa). Pre-processing and statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM8) software. RESULTS: While the stimulation temperatures were lower in the standard temperature condition, both conditions activated the same brain regions. When comparing the conditions directly to each other, we did not find significantly different grey matter activation patterns. CONCLUSIONS: The similar activation patterns between the two conditions suggest that it is not necessary to use individualized stimuli per se. The temperature of 46 °C appeared to be an adequate temperature for standardized stimulation to observe significant brain activations related to thermal pain.