Personalized neck irradiation guided by sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, larynx or hypopharynx with a clinically negative neck: (Chemo)radiotherapy to the PRIMary tumor only. Protocol of the PRIMO study.

Background: Elective neck irradiation (ENI) is performed in head and neck cancer patients treated with definitive (chemo)radiotherapy. The aim is to eradicate nodal metastases that are not detectable by pretreatment imaging techniques. It is conceivable that personalized neck irradiation can be performed guided by the results of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). It is expected that ENI can be omitted to one or both sides of the neck in 9 out of 10 patients, resulting in less radiation side effects with better quality of life. Methods/design: This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial aiming to compare safety and efficacy of treatment with SLNB guided neck irradiation versus standard bilateral ENI in 242 patients with cN0 squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, larynx or hypopharynx for whom bilateral ENI is indicated. Patients randomized to the experimental-arm will undergo SLNB. Based on the histopathologic status of the SLNs, patients will receive no ENI (if all SLNs are negative), unilateral neck irradiation only (if a SLN is positive at one side of the neck) or bilateral neck irradiation (if SLNs are positive at both sides of the neck). Patients randomized to the control arm will not undergo SLNB but will receive standard bilateral ENI. The primary safety endpoint is the number of patients with recurrence in regional lymph nodes within 2 years after treatment. The primary efficacy endpoint is patient reported xerostomia-related quality of life at 6 months after treatment. Discussion: If this trial demonstrates that the experimental treatment is non-inferior to the standard treatment in terms of regional recurrence and is superior in terms of xerostomia-related quality of life, this will become the new standard of care.

Surgical management of deep lobe parotid tumours with and without involvement of the parapharyngeal space.

The diagnosis and treatment of deep lobe parotid tumours is challenging because of the complex surgical accessibility. There is a lack of studies describing the differences between deep lobe tumours that do and do not occupy the parapharyngeal space (PPS). Patients treated for deep lobe tumours occupying the PPS (PPS group) and not occupying the PPS (non-PPS group) were analysed retrospectively. A total of 227 patients were treated surgically for deep lobe parotid tumours between 1990 and 2019. Sixty patients (26.4%) presented with tumours that involved the PPS (PPS group), while 167 (73.6%) presented with tumours that did not occupy the PPS (non-PPS group). The majority of the PPS group tumours were removed using a transcervical or transcervical-transparotid approach. PPS group tumours were larger (P < 0.001), and tumour spill occurred more frequently in this group (benign tumours: P = 0.002; malignant tumours: P = 0.033). Complication rates did not differ between the PPS and non-PPS groups. A transcervical or transcervical-transparotid approach is the preferred method for the management of deep lobe parotid tumours that occupy the PPS in our practice. Tumour spill occurred more frequently in the PPS group, which is most probably due to the larger tumour size and more complex accessibility.