Family planning decision-making in relation to psychiatric disorders in women: a qualitative focus group study.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies revealed an elevated likelihood of unintended pregnancies among women with psychiatric disorders compared to their counterparts without such vulnerability. Despite the importance of understanding family planning decision-making in this group, qualitative inquiries are lacking. This study explored family planning decisions among women with psychiatric disorders. METHODS: Utilizing a qualitative approach, three focus group discussions were conducted with purposive sampling: women with a history of unintended pregnancies (N = 3), women without children (N = 5), and women with a history of intended pregnancies (N = 9), all of whom had self-reported psychiatric disorders. Using thematic framework analysis, we investigated the themes "Shadow of the past," reflecting past experiences, and "Shadow of the future," reflecting future imaginaries, building upon the existing "Narrative Framework." RESULTS: The Narrative Framework formed the foundation for understanding family planning among women with psychiatric disorders. The retrospective dimension of focus group discussions provided opportunities for reflective narratives on sensitive topics, revealing emotions of regret, grief and relief. Childhood trauma, adverse events, and inadequate parenting enriched the "Shadow of the past". The "Shadow of the present" was identified as a novel theme, addressing awareness of psychiatric disorders and emotions toward psychiatric stability. Social influences, stigma, and concerns about transmitting psychiatric disorders shaped future imaginaries in the shadow of the future. CONCLUSIONS: This study enlightens how family planning decision-making in women with psychiatric disorders might be complex, as marked by the enduring impact of past experiences and societal influences in this sample. These nuanced insights underscore the necessity for tailored support for women with psychiatric disorders.

Recent studies show that women with psychiatric disorders are more likely to experience unintended pregnancies. However, the underlying reasons are not fully understood. Understanding those reasons is important to provide better healthcare. Our study explored how women with psychiatric disorders make decisions about family planning.We had conversations with different groups of women­women with unintended pregnancies, women without children, and women with intended pregnancies­through focus group discussions. We partnered with the Dutch mental health organization MIND to capture diverse opinions. Key themes and categories in the discussions were identified and organized.We found four main themes: "Shadow of the past" showed how past events, trauma, and lack of knowledge about parenting affect family planning. "Shadow of the present" revealed different feelings about family planning, the importance of the awareness of psychiatric disorders, and uncertainty about decisions. "Shadow of the future" included thoughts about becoming a mother, the impact of social influences, and concerns about passing on psychiatric disorders. "Reflections on the decision" showed how psychiatric disorders, experiences with motherhood, and feelings of regret, grief and relief had an influence on family planning decisions.In conclusion, our study highlighted the complexity of family planning decisions for women with psychiatric disorders. Past experiences and societal influences, like stigma, play a big role. These insights show the need for personalized family planning support for women with psychiatric disorders.

The conversation about family planning and desire for children in mental healthcare: Patients' perspective versus Professionals' perspective in a mixed methods study.

BACKGROUND: Reproductive health and mental health are intertwined, but studies investigating family planning needs and desire for children in mental healthcare are scarce. METHODS: We studied the experiences of (former) patients, those with close relationships with the (former) patients (close ones) and mental health professionals (MHP) on discussing family planning and desire for children in mental healthcare. We combined quantitative (two nationwide surveys) and qualitative data (four focus groups) in a mixed-methods approach with sequential analytical design. RESULTS: Combined data from focus groups (n = 19 participants) and two surveys (n = 139 MHPs and n = 294 (former) patients and close ones) showed that a considerable group of MHPs (64.0%), patients (40.9%) and close ones (50.0%) found that family planning should be discussed by a psychiatrist. However, several obstacles impeded a conversation, such as fear of judgment, lack of time and knowledge and limited opportunity for in-depth exploration of life themes in therapeutic relationships. CONCLUSIONS: To increase the autonomy of patients in discussing family planning, we suggest MHPs explore the desire to discuss family planning with all patients in the reproductive phase of life, prior to discussing contraceptive care. MHPs should receive education about psychiatric vulnerability in relation to family planning and desire for children, and patients and close ones should be empowered to initiate a conversation themselves.

Experiences with Family Planning amongst Persons with Mental Health Problems: A Nationwide Patient Survey.

High rates of unintended pregnancies in patients with mental health problems reflect the unmet need for tailored family planning. This study aims to explore aspects of family planning that are especially challenging for patients experiencing health problems by obtaining the perspective of (former) patients and those with close relationships with the (former) patients. In August 2021, members of a Dutch national mental health panel, consisting of (former) patients and close ones, were invited to respond to a 34-question online survey that included questions on four domains: reproductive history, decision making, parenting, and sexuality. This study has revealed the severe and adverse impact of mental health problems across all of the four domains of reproductive health and family planning, which the questions specifically targeted. Based on these results, we recommend discussing family planning with all patients experiencing or at risk for mental health problems and their partners. These discussions should address a desire to have children, (involuntary) childlessness, uncertainties about parenting and sexuality, while remaining considerate of experienced taboos.

Disulfide bonds determine growth hormone receptor folding, dimerisation and ligand binding.

The growth hormone receptor contains seven cysteine residues in its extracellular domain. The six in the growth hormone binding domain form disulfide bonds, and help the receptor to gain its correct three-dimensional structure. In this study we replaced the cysteine for serine and alanine residues and investigated their role in growth hormone receptor folding, dimerisation and signal transduction. Folding and growth hormone binding capacity of the wild-type growth hormone receptor require less than two minutes for completion. Although less efficient, all mutant receptors arrive at the cell surface as pre-formed dimers. Disulfide bond C38-C48 is important for efficient maturation. The middle disulfide-bond, C83-C94, is important for ligand binding. Removing disulfide bond C108-C122 has little effect without affecting signalling. When two or all disulfide bonds are changed, ligand binding and activation are blocked. Dimerisation is delayed when all disulfide bonds are destroyed.