[Topical NSAIDs: ineffective or undervalued?] / Topicale NSAID's: ineffectief of ondergewaardeerd?

Topical NSAIDs are currently recommended in several national and international guidelines for knee osteoarthritis, hand osteoarthritis and acute musculoskeletal pain. However, there is still widespread skepticism about the effectiveness of this treatment. This article discusses different reasons for this skepticism, a short summary of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of topical NSAIDs and an overview of available evidence regarding efficacy and safety. Based on this evidence topical NSAIDs have a clear place in the treatment of knee and hand osteoarthritis and acute musculoskeletal pain. Due to less systemic side effects they should be recommended before an oral NSAID is considered. Topical NSAIDs might even be an option for patients with contra-indications for oral NSAIDs. There is a large variety of available topical NSAIDs. Of the available topical NSAIDs in the Netherlands, diclofenac gel seems the most sensible choice.

Effectiveness and tolerability of oral vs subcutaneous methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and tolerability between oral MTX and s.c. MTX in a large group of RA patients in a real-life setting. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, adult patients with clinical diagnosis of RA who started MTX treatment (monotherapy or combined with HCQ) started with either oral or s.c. MTX. The primary outcome was superiority testing of between group difference in change in DAS28CRP between baseline and 3-6 months, and subsequent non-inferiority (non-inferiority margin 0.6) testing analyses in case of non-superiority. Secondary outcomes included MTX dose, side effects, laboratory abnormalities and use of comedication. RESULTS: Six hundred and forty RA patients were included: 259 started with oral MTX and 381 with s.c. MTX. There was no significant difference in ΔDAS28CRP [after adjusting for confounding, 0.13 (95% CI: -0.14, 0.40)], and oral MTX strategy was non-inferior to s.c. The mean MTX dose was slightly lower for the oral strategy [18.0 (6.9) vs 19.9 (8.2), P = 0.002], which was accompanied by a lower cumulative incidence of adverse events (41% vs 52%, P = 0.005). No differences were seen in use of other comedication. CONCLUSION: Starting with oral MTX in RA in a real-life setting is non-inferior to a s.c. MTX treatment with regard to disease activity control, at least when used in dosages up to 25 mg and on a background of HCQ co-treatment and a treat-to-target approach. In addition, tolerability was better. This supports the strategy of starting with oral MTX.

[Medicinal cannabis]. / Medicinale cannabis.

Medicinal cannabis The use of cannabis products for medical purposes is rapidly increasing in the Netherlands. Studies suggest that these products have positive effects in the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain, multiple-sclerosis-related spasticity, certain epilepsy syndromes and chemotherapy-related nausea and vomiting. The interpretation of these findings is impeded by methodological shortcomings, such as a small number of participants. Differences in product composition and dosage form mean that study resultsare often not directly comparable. Responsible prescribing requires that the patient be very well informed about the goal of treatment, alternative forms of treatment and the side effects. A history of psychosis, relevant cardiac co-morbidity, recurrent falls, addiction problems, pregnancy and breastfeeding are all contra-indications to the use of medical cannabis.

Tetrahydrocannabinol in Behavioral Disturbances in Dementia: A Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVES: Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are highly prevalent in dementia, but effective pharmacotherapy without important side effects is lacking. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of oral tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in the treatment of NPS in dementia. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, repeated crossover trial, consisting of six treatment blocks of 2 weeks each. SETTING: Two hospital sites in The Netherlands, September 2011 to December 2013. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with dementia and clinically relevant NPS. INTERVENTION: Within each block THC (0.75 mg twice daily in blocks 1-3 and 1.5 mg twice daily in blocks 4-6) and placebo were administered in random order for 3 consecutive days, followed by a 4-day washout. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome was change in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) score. Analyses were performed intention-to-treat. Data from all subjects were used without imputation. Sample size required for a power of 80% was 20 patients, because of repeated crossover. RESULTS: 22 patients (15 men, mean age 76.4 [5.3] years) were included, of whom 20 (91%) completed the trial. THC did not reduce NPI compared to placebo (blocks 1-3: 1.8, 97.5% CI: -2.1 to 5.8; blocks 4-6: -2.8, 97.5% CI: -7.4 to 1.8). THC was well tolerated, as assessed by adverse event monitoring, vital signs, and mobility. The incidence of adverse events was similar between treatment groups. Four non-related serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest randomized controlled trial studying the efficacy of THC for NPS, to date. Oral THC did not reduce NPS in dementia, but was well tolerated by these vulnerable patients, supporting future higher dosing studies.

Tetrahydrocannabinol for neuropsychiatric symptoms in dementia: A randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy and safety of low-dose oral tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in the treatment of dementia-related neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS). METHODS: This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients with dementia and clinically relevant NPS were randomly assigned to receive THC 1.5 mg or matched placebo (1:1) 3 times daily for 3 weeks. Primary outcome was change in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), assessed at baseline and after 14 and 21 days. Analyses were based on intention-to-treat. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients received THC and 26 received placebo. NPS were reduced during both treatment conditions. The difference in reduction from baseline between THC and placebo was not significant (mean difference NPItotal: 3.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] -3.6 to 10.0), nor were changes in scores for agitation (Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory 4.6, 95% CI -3.0 to 12.2), quality of life (Quality of Life-Alzheimer's Disease -0.5, 95% CI -2.6 to 1.6), or activities of daily living (Barthel Index 0.6, 95% CI -0.8 to 1.9). The number of patients experiencing mild or moderate adverse events was similar (THC, n = 16; placebo, n = 14, p = 0.36). No effects on vital signs, weight, or episodic memory were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Oral THC of 4.5 mg daily showed no benefit in NPS, but was well-tolerated, which adds valuable knowledge to the scarce evidence on THC in dementia. The benign adverse event profile of this dosage allows study of whether higher doses are efficacious and equally well-tolerated. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that for patients with dementia-related NPS, low-dose THC does not significantly reduce NPS at 21 days, though it is well-tolerated.

Safety, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of multiple oral doses of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in older persons with dementia.

RATIONALE: Data on safety, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) are lacking in dementia patients. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial, we evaluated the safety, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of THC in ten patients with dementia (mean age 77.3 ± 5.6). For 12 weeks, participants randomly received oral THC (weeks 1-6, 0.75 mg; weeks 7-12, 1.5 mg) or placebo twice daily for 3 days, separated by a 4-day washout period. RESULTS: Only 6 of the 98 reported adverse events were related to THC. Visual analog scale (VAS) feeling high, VAS external perception, body sway-eyes-open, and diastolic blood pressure were not significantly different with THC. After the 0.75-mg dose, VAS internal perception (0.025 units; 95% CI 0.010-0.040) and heart rate (2 beats/min; 95% CI 0.4-3.8) increased significantly. Body sway-eyes-closed increased only after 1.5 mg (0.59°/s; 95% CI 0.13-1.06). Systolic blood pressure changed significantly after both doses of THC (0.75 mg, -7 mmHg, 95% CI -11.4, -3.0; 1.5 mg, 5 mmHg, 95% CI 1.0-9.2). The median T max was 1-2 h, with THC pharmacokinetics increasing linearly with increasing dose, with wide interindividual variability (CV% up to 140%). The mean C max (ng/mL) after the first dose (0-6 h) was 0.41 (0.18-0.90) for the 0.75-mg dose and 1.01 (0.53-1.92) for the 1.5-mg dose. After the second dose (6-24 h), the C max was 0.50 (0.27-0.92) and 0.98 (0.46-2.06), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: THC was rapidly absorbed and had dose-linear pharmacokinetics with considerable interindividual variation. Pharmacodynamic effects, including adverse events, were minor. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the pharmacodynamics and efficacy of higher THC doses in older persons with dementia.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of oral delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in healthy older subjects: a randomized controlled trial.

There is a great concern about the safety of THC-based drugs in older people (≥65 years), as most of THC-trials did not include such group. In this phase 1, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial, we evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetics of three oral doses of Namisol(®), a novel THC in tablet form, in older subjects. Twelve healthy older subjects (6 male; mean age 72±5 years) randomly received a single oral dose of 3mg, 5mg, or 6.5mg of THC or matching placebo, in a crossover manner, on each intervention day. The data for 11 subjects were included in the analysis. The data of 1 subject were excluded due to non-compliance to study medication. THC was safe and well tolerated. The most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) were drowsiness (27%) and dry mouth (11%). Subjects reported more AEs with THC 6.5mg than with 3mg (p=0.048), 5mg (p=0.034) and placebo (p=0.013). There was a wide inter-individual variability in plasma concentrations of THC. Subjects for whom the Cmax fell within the sampling period (over 2h), Cmax was 1.42-4.57ng/mL and Tmax was 67-92min. The AUC0-2h (n=11) was 1.67-3.51ng/mL. Overall, the pharmacodynamic effects of THC were smaller than effects previously reported in young adults. In conclusion, THC appeared to be safe and well tolerated by healthy older individuals. Data on safety and effectiveness of THC in frail older persons are urgently required, as this population could benefit from the therapeutic applications of THC.