ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Child maltreatment is a great public health concern that has long-term mental and physical health consequences and can result in death. We studied the effect of a nurse home visiting program on child maltreatment among young disadvantaged families in The Netherlands. This study is the first to investigate the effects of this program outside of the United States. METHODS: We conducted a single blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial that compared usual care with the nurse home visitation program, which began during pregnancy and continued until the children's second birthdays, in 460 disadvantaged women who were pregnant for the first time and <26 years of age. The primary outcome was the existence of a report about the child from a child protecting services agency (CPS reports). Secondary outcome measures included home environment and child behavior. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-three participants were assigned to the control group, and 237 were assigned to the intervention group. Three years after birth, 19% of the children in the control group had a CPS report. The 11 percent of children in the intervention group with CPS files was significantly lower (relative risk 0.91, p-value 0.04). At 24 months, the intervention group scored significantly better on the IT-HOME. At 24 months after birth, the children in the intervention group exhibited a significant improvement in internalizing behavior (relative risk 0.56, p-value 0.04) but no evidence of a difference from the control group in externalizing behavior (relative risk 0.71, p-value 0.12). CONCLUSION: The number of CPS reports for the intervention group was significantly lower than that of the control group. Additionally, the long-term home environments were improved and internalizing behaviors of the children were lower in the intervention group. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register NTR854.
Subject(s)
Child Abuse , Family , Growth and Development , House Calls , Nurses , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Adult , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Netherlands , PregnancyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: antenatal smoking is more prevalent among young women with low socio-economic status. The aim of our study is to assess whether the VoorZorg programme, compared to usual care, is effective in reducing cigarette smoking among young high risk pregnant women. Furthermore, the effect of VoorZorg on pregnancy outcomes and on breast feeding will be described. DESIGN: a randomised controlled trial of VoorZorg, a nurse home visitation intervention, was undertaken over a 2½ year period from 2007 to 2009. Data were collected between 16 and 28 weeks gestation, 32 weeks gestation and at two months post partum on cigarette smoking status plus six months post partum for breastfeeding prevalence. Neonatal birth weight and gestation at birth were also collected. SETTING: participants living in 20 municipalities in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: 460 pregnant women were recruited by different professionals. Inclusion criteria were age <26 years, ≤28 weeks pregnancy with the first child, low educational level and some knowledge of the Dutch language. INTERVENTIONS: women in the intervention group received, in addition to usual care, the VoorZorg programme which consisted of 40-60 home visits by specialised nurses from pregnancy until two years after birth. FINDINGS: the percentage of smokers was significantly lower in the intervention group (40%) compared to the control group (48%) during pregnancy (p=0.03) and at two months post birth (49% and 62%; p=0.02). During pregnancy the number of daily cigarettes smoked was reduced in both groups. After birth, the intervention group smoked 50% less cigarettes compared to the control group (C: 8±10; I: 4±7 (mean±standard deviation (SD)), p=0.01). Furthermore, women in the intervention group did not smoke near the baby (C: 2±5; I: 0±0 (mean±SD) p=0.03). Birth weight and gestational age were similar in both groups (C: 3147g, 40 weeks; I: 3144g, 39 weeks (p=0.94, p=0.17)). Significantly more women in the intervention group were still breast feeding their baby at six months post -birth (C: 6%; I: 13%, p=0.04). KEY CONCLUSIONS: VoorZorg seemed to be effective in reducing cigarette smoking and in increasing breastfeeding duration. No effect was found on pregnancy outcomes.
Subject(s)
Breast Feeding , Pregnant Women/psychology , Smoking Cessation , Social Support , Female , House Calls , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Interviews as Topic , Midwifery , Netherlands , Patient Education as Topic , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimesters , Single-Blind Method , Socioeconomic Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Expectant mothers and mothers of young children are especially vulnerable to intimate partner violence (IPV). The nurse-family partnership (NFP) is a home visitation program in the United States effective for the prevention of adverse child health outcomes. Evidence regarding the effect of nurse home visiting on IPV is inconsistent. This study aims to study the effect of VoorZorg, the Dutch NFP, on IPV. METHODS: A random sample of 460 eligible disadvantaged women <26 years, with no previous live births, was randomized. Women in the control group (C; n=223) received usual care; women in the intervention group (I; n=237) received usual care plus nurse home visits periodically during pregnancy and until the child's second birthday. RESULTS: At 32 weeks of pregnancy, women in the intervention group self-reported significantly less IPV victimization than women in the control group in: level 2 psychological aggression (C: 56% vs. I: 39%), physical assault level 1 (C: 58% vs. I: 40%) and level 2 (C: 31% vs. I: 20%), and level 1 sexual coercion (C: 16% vs. I: 8%). Furthermore, women in the intervention group reported significantly less IPV perpetration in: level 2 psychological aggression (C: 60% vs. I: 46%), level 1 physical assault (C: 65% vs. I: 52%), and level 1 injury (C: 27% vs. I: 17%). At 24 months after birth, IPV victimization was significantly lower in the intervention group for level 1 physical assault (C: 44% vs. I: 26%), and IPV perpetration was significantly lower for level 1 sexual assault (C: 18% vs. I: 3%). Multilevel analyses showed a significant improvement in IPV victimization and perpetration among women in the intervention group at 24 months after birth. CONCLUSION: VoorZorg, compared with the usual care, is effective in reducing IPV during pregnancy and in the two years after birth among young high-risk women. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register NTR854 http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=854.
