Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 60(4): 589-590, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36183346
2.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 60(4): 570-576, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34767663

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a tool for automatic selection of the slice of minimal hiatal dimensions (SMHD) and segmentation of the urogenital hiatus (UH) in transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) volumes. METHODS: Manual selection of the SMHD and segmentation of the UH was performed in TPUS volumes of 116 women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse (POP). These data were used to train two deep-learning algorithms. The first algorithm was trained to provide an estimation of the position of the SMHD. Based on this estimation, a slice was selected and fed into the second algorithm, which performed automatic segmentation of the UH. From this segmentation, measurements of the UH area (UHA), anteroposterior diameter (APD) and coronal diameter (CD) were computed automatically. The mean absolute distance between manually and automatically selected SMHD, the overlap (dice similarity index (DSI)) between manual and automatic UH segmentation and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between manual and automatic UH measurements were assessed on a test set of 30 TPUS volumes. RESULTS: The mean absolute distance between manually and automatically selected SMHD was 0.20 cm. All DSI values between manual and automatic UH segmentations were above 0.85. The ICC values between manual and automatic UH measurements were 0.94 (95% CI, 0.87-0.97) for UHA, 0.92 (95% CI, 0.78-0.97) for APD and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.66-0.91) for CD, demonstrating excellent agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Our deep-learning algorithms allowed reliable automatic selection of the SMHD and UH segmentation in TPUS volumes of women with symptomatic POP. These algorithms can be implemented in the software of TPUS machines, thus reducing clinical analysis time and simplifying the examination of TPUS data for research and clinical purposes. © 2021 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.


Subject(s)
Obstetrics , Pelvic Organ Prolapse , Algorithms , Female , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Pelvic Organ Prolapse/diagnostic imaging , Pregnancy , Ultrasonography/methods
3.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 54(2): 270-275, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30461079

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To measure the length, width and area of the urogenital hiatus (UH), and the length and mean echogenicity (MEP) of the puborectalis muscle (PRM), automatically and observer-independently, in the plane of minimal hiatal dimensions on transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) images, by automatic segmentation of the UH and the PRM using deep learning. METHODS: In 1318 three- and four-dimensional (3D/4D) TPUS volume datasets from 253 nulliparae at 12 and 36 weeks' gestation, two-dimensional (2D) images in the plane of minimal hiatal dimensions with the PRM at rest, on maximum contraction and on maximum Valsalva maneuver, were obtained manually and the UH and PRM were segmented manually. In total, 713 of the images were used to train a convolutional neural network (CNN) to segment automatically the UH and PRM in the plane of minimal hiatal dimensions. In the remainder of the dataset (test set 1 (TS1); 601 images, four having been excluded), the performance of the CNN was evaluated by comparing automatic and manual segmentations. The performance of the CNN was also tested on 117 images from an independent dataset (test set 2 (TS2); two images having been excluded) from 40 nulliparae at 12 weeks' gestation, which were acquired and segmented manually by a different observer. The success of automatic segmentation was assessed visually. Based on the CNN segmentations, the following clinically relevant parameters were measured: the length, width and area of the UH, the length of the PRM and MEP. The overlap (Dice similarity index (DSI)) and surface distance (mean absolute distance (MAD) and Hausdorff distance (HDD)) between manual and CNN segmentations were measured to investigate their similarity. For the measured clinically relevant parameters, the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between manual and CNN results were determined. RESULTS: Fully automatic CNN segmentation was successful in 99.0% and 93.2% of images in TS1 and TS2, respectively. DSI, MAD and HDD showed good overlap and distance between manual and CNN segmentations in both test sets. This was reflected in the respective ICC values in TS1 and TS2 for the length (0.96 and 0.95), width (0.77 and 0.87) and area (0.96 and 0.91) of the UH, the length of the PRM (0.87 and 0.73) and MEP (0.95 and 0.97), which showed good to very good agreement. CONCLUSION: Deep learning can be used to segment automatically and reliably the PRM and UH on 2D ultrasound images of the nulliparous pelvic floor in the plane of minimal hiatal dimensions. These segmentations can be used to measure reliably UH dimensions as well as PRM length and MEP. © 2018 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Muscles/diagnostic imaging , Pelvic Floor/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography/methods , Urogenital System/diagnostic imaging , Abdominal Muscles/anatomy & histology , Abdominal Muscles/physiology , Deep Learning , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Muscle Contraction/physiology , Nerve Net , Pregnancy , Urogenital System/anatomy & histology , Urogenital System/physiology , Valsalva Maneuver/physiology
4.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 54(1): 119-123, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30461093

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To confirm our previous observation that levator hiatal dimensions and mean echogenicity of the puborectalis muscle (MEP) are significantly different at 12 weeks' gestation in women who delivered by Cesarean section due to failure to progress compared with those who delivered vaginally. The secondary objective was to assess the association between the echogenicity of the cervix and vastus lateralis muscle and mode of delivery. METHODS: In this prospective multicenter study, 306 nulliparous women with a singleton pregnancy underwent ultrasound assessments of the pelvic floor at rest, on maximum pelvic floor muscle contraction and on maximum Valsalva maneuver, of the cervix and of the vastus lateralis muscle at 12 weeks' gestation. Dimensions of the levator hiatus, MEP and mean echogenicity of the cervix and vastus lateralis muscle were measured and compared according to mode of delivery. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-nine women were included in the analyses. We were unable to confirm our previous finding that MEP and levator hiatal transverse diameter and area at 12 weeks' gestation are associated significantly with mode of delivery. In addition, we could not demonstrate a significant association between echogenicity of the cervix or vastus lateralis muscle and mode of delivery. Overall, MEP was a mean of 20 points lower in women in the new database as compared with the previous study, despite the use of the same ultrasound equipment. CONCLUSION: In a second, independent multicenter dataset, we were unable to confirm our previous finding that levator hiatal dimensions and MEP on pelvic floor muscle contraction are associated significantly with mode of delivery. We also found no association between echogenicity of the cervix or vastus lateralis and mode of delivery. Copyright © 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.


Subject(s)
Cervix Uteri/diagnostic imaging , Delivery, Obstetric/trends , Pelvic Floor/diagnostic imaging , Quadriceps Muscle/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography/methods , Adult , Cervix Uteri/anatomy & histology , Cervix Uteri/physiology , Cesarean Section/methods , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/instrumentation , Muscle Contraction/physiology , Netherlands/epidemiology , Pelvic Floor/anatomy & histology , Pelvic Floor/physiology , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Quadriceps Muscle/physiology , Valsalva Maneuver/physiology
5.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 52(1): 97-102, 2018 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29024119

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The introduction of three-dimensional (3D) analysis of the puborectalis muscle (PRM) for diagnostic purposes into daily practice is hindered by the need for appropriate training of observers. Automatic segmentation of the PRM on 3D transperineal ultrasound may aid its integration into clinical practice. The aims of this study were to present and assess a protocol for manual 3D segmentation of the PRM on 3D transperineal ultrasound, and to use this for training of automatic 3D segmentation method of the PRM. METHODS: The data used in this study were derived from 3D transperineal ultrasound sequences of the pelvic floor acquired at 12 weeks' gestation from nulliparous women with a singleton pregnancy. A manual 3D segmentation protocol was developed for the PRM based on a validated two-dimensional segmentation protocol. For automatic segmentation, active appearance models of the PRM were developed, trained using manual segmentation data from 50 women. The performances of both manual and automatic segmentation were analyzed by measuring the overlap and distance between the segmentations. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and their 95% CIs were determined for mean echogenicity and volume of the puborectalis muscle, in order to assess inter- and intraobserver reliabilities of the manual method using data from 20 women, as well as to compare the manual and automatic methods. RESULTS: Interobserver reliabilities for mean echogenicity and volume were very good for manual segmentation (ICCs 0.987 and 0.910, respectively), as were intraobserver reliabilities (ICCs 0.991 and 0.877, respectively). ICCs for mean echogenicity and volume were very good and good, respectively, for the comparison of manual vs automatic segmentation (0.968 and 0.626, respectively). The overlap and distance results for manual segmentation were as expected, showing an average mismatch of only 2-3 pixels and reasonable overlap. Based on overlap and distance, five mismatches were detected for automatic segmentation, resulting in an automatic segmentation success rate of 90%. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents a reliable manual segmentation protocol and automatic 3D segmentation method for the PRM, which will facilitate future investigation of the PRM, allowing for the reliable measurement of potentially clinically valuable parameters such as mean echogenicity. © 2017 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.


Subject(s)
Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Muscle Contraction/physiology , Obstetrics/education , Pelvic Floor/diagnostic imaging , Postpartum Period/physiology , Ultrasonography , Adult , Delivery, Obstetric , Female , Humans , Pelvic Floor/anatomy & histology , Pelvic Floor/physiology , Pregnancy , Reference Values , Reproducibility of Results , Video Recording
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL