Intracochlear Position of Cochlear Implants Determined Using CT Scanning versus Fitting Levels: Higher Threshold Levels at Basal Turn.

OBJECTIVES: In this study, the effects of the intracochlear position of cochlear implants on the clinical fitting levels were analyzed. DESIGN: A total of 130 adult subjects who used a CII/HiRes 90K cochlear implant with a HiFocus 1/1J electrode were included in the study. The insertion angle and the distance to the modiolus of each electrode contact were determined using high-resolution CT scanning. The threshold levels (T-levels) and maximum comfort levels (M-levels) at 1 year of follow-up were determined. The degree of speech perception of the subjects was evaluated during routine clinical follow-up. RESULTS: The depths of insertion of all the electrode contacts were determined. The distance to the modiolus was significantly smaller at the basal and apical cochlear parts compared with that at the middle of the cochlea (p < 0.05). The T-levels increased toward the basal end of the cochlea (3.4 dB). Additionally, the M-levels, which were fitted in our clinic using a standard profile, also increased toward the basal end, although with a lower amplitude (1.3 dB). Accordingly, the dynamic range decreased toward the basal end (2.1 dB). No correlation was found between the distance to the modiolus and the T-level or the M-level. Furthermore, the correlation between the insertion depth and stimulation levels was not affected by the duration of deafness, age at implantation or the time since implantation. Additionally, the T-levels showed a significant correlation with the speech perception scores (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The stimulation levels of the cochlear implants were affected by the intracochlear position of the electrode contacts, which were determined using postoperative CT scanning. Interestingly, these levels depended on the insertion depth, whereas the distance to the modiolus did not affect the stimulation levels. The T-levels increased toward the basal end of the cochlea. The level profiles were independent of the overall stimulation levels and were not affected by the biographical data of the patients, such as the duration of deafness, age at implantation or time since implantation. Further research is required to elucidate how fitting using level profiles with an increase toward the basal end of the cochlea benefits speech perception. Future investigations may elucidate an explanation for the effects of the intracochlear electrode position on the stimulation levels and might facilitate future improvements in electrode design.

Population-based prediction of fitting levels for individual cochlear implant recipients.

OBJECTIVES: This study analyzed the predictability of fitting levels for cochlear implant recipients based on a review of the clinical levels of the recipients. DESIGN: Data containing threshold levels (T-levels) and maximum comfort levels (M-levels) for 151 adult subjects using a CII/HiRes 90K cochlear implant with a HiFocus 1/1 J electrode were used. The 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th and 90th percentiles of the T- and M-levels are reported. Speech perception of the subjects, using a HiRes speech coding strategy, was measured during routine clinical follow-up. RESULTS: T-levels for most subjects were between 20 and 35% of their M-levels and were rarely (<1/50) below 10% of the M-levels. Furthermore, both T- and M-levels showed an increase over the first year of follow-up. Interestingly, levels expressed in linear charge units showed a clear increase in dynamic range (DR) over 1 year (29.8 CU; SD 73.0), whereas the DR expressed in decibels remained stable. T-level and DR were the only fitting parameters for which a significant correlation with speech perception (r = 0.34, p < 0.01, and r = 0.33, p < 0.01, respectively) could be demonstrated. Additionally, analysis showed that T- and M-level profiles expressed in decibels were independent of the subjects' across-site mean levels. Using mixed linear models, predictive models were obtained for the T- and M-levels of all separate electrode contacts. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the data set from 151 subjects, clinically applicable predictive models for T- and M-levels have been obtained. Based on one psychophysical measurement and a population-based T- or M-level profile, individual recipients' T- and M-levels can be approximated with a closed-set formula. Additionally, the analyzed fitting level data can serve as a reference for future patients.

Communication between human mast cells and CD4(+) T cells through antigen-dependent interactions.

Mast cells (MCs) are immune cells residing in tissues where pathogens are first encountered. It has been indicated that MCs might also be involved in setting the outcome of T-cell responses. However, little is known about the capacity of human MCs to express MHC class II and/or to capture and present antigens to CD4(+) T cells. To study the T-cell stimulatory potential of human MCs, CD34(+) stem cell derived MCs were generated. These cells expressed HLA-DR when stimulated with IFN-γ, and, importantly, presented peptide and protein for activation of antigen-specific CD4(+) T cells. The interplay between MC and T cell led to increased HLA-DR expression on MCs. MCs were present in close proximity to T cells in tonsil and expressed HLA-DR and CD80, indicating their ability to present antigens to CD4(+) T cells in T-cell areas of human LNs. Our data show that MCs can present native antigens to human CD4(+) T cells and that HLA-DR expressing MCs are present in tonsil tissue, indicating that human MCs can directly activate T cells and provide a rationale to study the potential of MCs to prime and/or skew human T-cell responses.

Effects of parameter manipulations on spread of excitation measured with electrically-evoked compound action potentials.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the spread of excitation (SOE) profiles derived by eCAP measures and analysed the effects of various parameter settings. DESIGN: SOE was measured using the forward masking technique (selectivity), as well as with a "fixed stimulus, variable recording" (scanning) technique. SOE profiles were produced at three current levels and at three sites along the array. Additionally, effects of the position of the recording electrodes and artefact rejection methods were studied in five subjects. Furthermore, correlation between SOE data and speech perception data was tested. All data were analysed using linear mixed models. STUDY SAMPLE: Measurements were performed intraoperatively in 31 users of the Advanced Bionics HiRes 90K cochlear implant. RESULTS: The selectivity method produced narrower excitation profiles than the scanning method, showing an asymmetry along the array with wider SOE apically. Moreover, the position of the recording electrode shifted the SOE curves towards the recording contact, enhancing asymmetry. Neither significant effects of current level or artefact rejection methods were observed, nor a significant correlation with speech perception. CONCLUSIONS: SOE profiles obtained with the scanning method are wider than with the selectivity method. Both are insensitive to various parameter settings, although selectivity curves are shifted towards the recording contact.