Glomerular filtration rate in critically ill neonates and children: creatinine-based estimations versus iohexol-based measurements.

BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) and augmented renal clearance (ARC), both alterations of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), are prevalent in critically ill children and neonates. AKI and ARC prevalence estimates are based on estimation of GFR (eGFR) using serum creatinine (SCr), which is known to be inaccurate. We aimed to test our hypothesis that AKI prevalence will be higher and ARC prevalence will be lower in critically ill children when using iohexol-based measured GFR (mGFR), rather than using eGFR. Additionally, we aimed to investigate the performance of different SCr-based eGFR methods. METHODS: In this single-center prospective study, critically ill term-born neonates and children were included. mGFR was calculated using a plasma disappearance curve after parenteral administration of iohexol. AKI diagnosis was based on the KDIGO criteria, SCr-based eGFR, and creatinine clearance (CrCL). Differences between eGFR and mGFR were determined using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and by calculating bias and accuracy (percentage of eGFR values within 30% of mGFR values). RESULTS: One hundred five children, including 43 neonates, were included. AKI prevalence was higher based on mGFR (48%), than with KDIGO or eGFR (11-40%). ARC prevalence was lower with mGFR (24%) compared to eGFR (38-51%). eGFR equations significantly overestimated mGFR (60-71 versus 41 ml/min/1.73 m2, p < 0.001-0.002). Accuracy was highest with eGFR equations based on age- and sex-dependent equations (up to 59%). CONCLUSION: Iohexol-based AKI prevalence was higher and ARC prevalence lower compared to standard SCr-based eGFR methods. Age- and sex-dependent equations for eGFR (eGFR-Smeets for neonates and eGFR-Pierce for children) best approached measured GFR and should preferably be used to optimize diagnosis of AKI and ARC in this population. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Maturation of GFR in Term-Born Neonates: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The evidence from individual studies to support the maturational pattern of GFR in healthy, term-born neonates is inconclusive. We performed an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis of reported measured GFR (mGFR) data, aiming to establish neonatal GFR reference values. Furthermore, we aimed to optimize neonatal creatinine-based GFR estimations. METHODS: We identified studies reporting mGFR measured by exogenous markers or creatinine clearance (CrCL) in healthy, term-born neonates. The relationship between postnatal age and clearance was investigated using cubic splines with generalized additive linear mixed models. From our reference values, we estimated an updated coefficient for the Schwartz equation (eGFR [ml/min per 1.73 m2]=(k×height [cm])/serum creatinine [mg/dl]). RESULTS: Forty-eight out of 1521 screened articles reported mGFR in healthy, term-born neonates, and 978 mGFR values from 881 neonates were analyzed. IPD were available for 367 neonates, and the other 514 neonates were represented by 41 aggregated data points as means/medians per group. GFR doubled in the first 5 days after birth, from 19.6 (95% CI, 14.7 to 24.6) to 40.6 (95% CI, 36.7 to 44.5) ml/min per 1.73 m2, and then increased more gradually to 59.4 (95% CI, 45.9 to 72.9) ml/min per 1.73 m2 by 4 weeks of age. A coefficient of 0.31 to estimate GFR best fitted the data. CONCLUSIONS: These reference values for healthy, term-born neonates show a biphasic increase in GFR, with the largest increase between days 1 and 5. Together with the re-examined Schwartz equation, this can help identify altered GFR in term-born neonates. To enable widespread implementation of our proposed eGFR equation, validation in a large cohort of neonates is required.