[Towards personalized treatment with clozapine]. / Op naar een gepersonaliseerde clozapinebehandeling.

BACKGROUND: Clozapine is the most effective treatment for people with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. However, it is prescribed less often than guidelines indicate. AIM: To personalize clozapine treatment, we investigated the efficacy of clozapine as first- or second-line treatment and investigated whether there are factors that were associated with efficacy and side effects. METHOD: We collected a unique cohort of over 800 clozapine users diagnosed with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder. We meta-analyzed factors that were associated with response during clozapine treatment. Additionally, we conducted genetic association analyses to investigate the relations between side effects and symptom severity during clozapinetreatment. RESULTS: From our meta-analyses, we found that clozapine was more effective when used as a first- or second-line treatment. Furthermore, we found that younger age, less negative symptoms and the paranoid subtype of schizophreniawere associated with a better clozapine response. Several specific locations on genes (loci) were associated with clozapine-induced agranulocytosis and neutropenia, while polygenic risk scores were associated with symptom severity. CONCLUSION: We found that clozapine could be effective earlier in treatment and identified factors that could aid the prediction of< response to clozapine treatment in the future. These finding could contribute to the start of a personalized clozapine treatment.

[Genetic risk of mental illness: what do we know and how do we communicate this?] / Genetisch risico van psychiatrische ziekten: wat weten we en hoe communiceren we dat?

BACKGROUND: Insights from psychiatric genetics research and large international psychiatric genetics consortia are promising but still remain outside the realm of clinical practice.
AIM: To provide an overview of developments in the field of psychiatric genetics; and to offer guidance for health professionals how to assess and manage clinical implications of these developments.
METHOD: In this review, we address: recent developments in psychiatric genetics, with a focus on polygenic risk scores (PRS); ethical dilemmas associated with clinical application of PRS; and basic principles of genetic counseling for psychiatric disorders.
RESULTS: PRS are not yet ready for implementation in clinical practice because of limited predictive value and poor generalizability. In addition, it is still unclear how genetic risk and PRS can be communicated clearly to patients and families.
CONCLUSION: Advances in psychiatric genetics and increased availability of genetic risk scores may lead to questions from patients and families coping with psychiatric illness. These questions may be best addressed using psychiatric genetic counseling techniques. We recommend that psychiatrists have some basic knowledge of psychiatric genetics and know how to refer their patients to a clinical geneticist. Implementing a psychiatric genetics theme in training and education may be helpful.
.

[Guidelines on genetic testing in psychiatry: an overview]. / Leidraad genetisch testen in de psychiatrie.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, technological advances have led to the identification of numerous genetic variations that are associated with psychiatric symptoms. Establishing a genetic cause may provide patients and family members with an explanation for the problems and in specific cases allows targeted treatment of psychiatric and somatic (co)morbidity. At present, patients with psychiatric disorders are rarely referred for genetic testing. AIM: To provide an overview of literature and (inter)national guidelines in the field of genetic testing for patients with psychiatric disorder, and to present guidance on indications for genetic testing in clinical practice. METHOD: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed and Embase focusing on articles with recommendations on genetic testing in psychiatric disorders. In addition, national and international guidelines on genetic testing in psychiatry were studied. The main findings were summarized in an infographic. RESULTS: Based on the current literature and (inter)national guidelines, patients with (comorbid) intellectual disability should always be referred to a clinical geneticist. Psychiatrists should consider genetic testing in patients with other psychiatric disorders if there are ‘red flags’ such as a positive family history, congenital abnormalities, developmental delay, dysmorphic features, movement disorders or cognitive decline. Psychiatrists may request genetic testing themselves or refer patients to clinical geneticists. CONCLUSION: Psychiatric disorders may be underpinned by a genetic anomaly, particularly in patients presenting with psychiatric as well as somatic symptomatology. Psychiatrists should recognize symptoms and warning signs indicative of an underlying genetic abnormality, and know when to refer their patients for genetic testing.

Genome-wide association analyses of symptom severity among clozapine-treated patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

Clozapine is the most effective antipsychotic for patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. However, response is highly variable and possible genetic underpinnings of this variability remain unknown. Here, we performed polygenic risk score (PRS) analyses to estimate the amount of variance in symptom severity among clozapine-treated patients explained by PRSs (R2) and examined the association between symptom severity and genotype-predicted CYP1A2, CYP2D6, and CYP2C19 enzyme activity. Genome-wide association (GWA) analyses were performed to explore loci associated with symptom severity. A multicenter cohort of 804 patients (after quality control N = 684) with schizophrenia spectrum disorder treated with clozapine were cross-sectionally assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and/or the Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scale. GWA and PRS regression analyses were conducted. Genotype-predicted CYP1A2, CYP2D6, and CYP2C19 enzyme activities were calculated. Schizophrenia-PRS was most significantly and positively associated with low symptom severity (p = 1.03 × 10-3; R2 = 1.85). Cross-disorder-PRS was also positively associated with lower CGI-S score (p = 0.01; R2 = 0.81). Compared to the lowest tertile, patients in the highest schizophrenia-PRS tertile had 1.94 times (p = 6.84×10-4) increased probability of low symptom severity. Higher genotype-predicted CYP2C19 enzyme activity was independently associated with lower symptom severity (p = 8.44×10-3). While no locus surpassed the genome-wide significance threshold, rs1923778 within NFIB showed a suggestive association (p = 3.78×10-7) with symptom severity. We show that high schizophrenia-PRS and genotype-predicted CYP2C19 enzyme activity are independently associated with lower symptom severity among individuals treated with clozapine. Our findings open avenues for future pharmacogenomic projects investigating the potential of PRS and genotype-predicted CYP-activity in schizophrenia.

[Validation of the Dutch Glasgow Anti- psychotic Side-Effect Scale for Clozapine]. / Glasgow Antipsychotica Bijwerkingen Schaal voor Clozapine; validatie van de Nederlandstalige versie.

BACKGROUND: To monitor the unique side effect pattern of clozapine, the Glasgow Antipsychotic Side-effect Scale for Clozapine (GASS-C) was developed in English and validated. This questionnaire was previously translated to Dutch, and revised, but not yet validated. AIM: The current study concerns the validation of the second revision of the GASS-C-NL-R2 for the Dutch language. METHOD: Two Spearman correlation tests were conducted to compare GASS-C-NL-R2 with the Dutch version of the Liverpool University Neuroleptic Side-Effect Rating Scale (LUNSERS) at two time p´oints. There was one week between these two time points. The test-retest reliability was determined using a Spearman correlation test and Cronbach's alpha on the GASS-C-NL-R2 between the two time points. In addition, a factor analysis was performed. RESULTS: Spearman's correlation coefficient between the GASS-C-NL-R2 and the LUNSERS was 0.830 (p < 0.001, n = 72) at the first time point and 0.684 (p < 0.001, n = 50) at the second time point. GASS-C-NL-R2 also had a strong test-retest reliability: Spearman's correlation coefficient was 0.680 (p < 0.001; n = 46), and Cronbach's alpha was 0.847, n = 78. Factor analysis showed that all questions were relevant. CONCLUSION: The current study shows that GASS-C-NL-R2 is a valid and reliable questionnaire to monitor side effects related to clozapine with a relatively high prevalence. Future studies should focus on the practical utility of GASS-C-NL-R2 with a larger sample size.

Polygenic risk scores for genetic counseling in psychiatry: Lessons learned from other fields of medicine.

Polygenic risk scores (PRS) may aid in the identification of individuals at-risk for psychiatric disorders, treatment optimization, and increase in prognostic accuracy. PRS may also add significant value to genetic counseling. Thus far, integration of PRSs in genetic counseling sessions remains problematic because of uncertainties in risk prediction and other concerns. Here, we review the current utility of PRSs in the context of clinical psychiatry. By comprehensively appraising the literature in other fields of medicine including breast cancer, Alzheimer's Disease, and cardiovascular disease, we outline several lessons learned that could be applied to future studies and may thus benefit the incorporation of PRS in psychiatric genetic counseling. These include integrating PRS with environmental factors (e.g. lifestyle), setting up large-scale studies, and applying reproducible methods allowing for cross-validation between cohorts. We conclude that psychiatry may benefit from experiences in these fields. PRS may in future have a role in genetic counseling in clinical psychiatric practice, by advancing prevention strategies and treatment decision-making, thus promoting quality of life for (potentially) affected individuals.

Isolated nausea and vomiting as the cardinal presenting symptoms of clozapine-induced myocarditis: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Clozapine is an atypical antipsychotic proven to be superior in the treatment of treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Myocarditis is a rare, but well-known complication of treatment with clozapine. Only few cases have been reported in which nausea and vomiting were prominent symptoms. This is the first described report in which nausea and vomiting were the only presenting symptoms of clozapine-induced myocarditis. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of a 58-year-old woman, suffering from schizoaffective disorder, who is being treated with clozapine. Two weeks after initiation of clozapine, she developed nausea and vomiting, in absence of any other clinical symptoms. Laboratory examination and magnetic resonance imaging confirmed the diagnosis of clozapine-induced myocarditis. Clozapine was discontinued and the patient recovered fully. CONCLUSIONS: This case emphasizes the importance of recognizing myocarditis as a cause of isolated nausea and vomiting in patients treated with clozapine. Early recognition improves clinical outcome and reduces mortality.