Post-EVAR aneurysm sac shrinkage is prognostically favorable, but does not justify withholding follow-up.

BACKGROUND: One of the main drawbacks of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) compared to open aortic surgery is the possibility of developing endoleaks and secondary aneurysm rupture, requiring frequent imaging follow-up. This study aims to identify prognostic factors that could be incorporated in follow-up protocols, which might lead to better personalized, lower cost and safe EVAR follow-up. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed including all patients who underwent elective EVAR from January 2000 to December 2015. Follow-up data were gathered by reviewing medical files for radiographic imaging. Linear and logistic regressions were used to assess predictive factors for aneurysm shrinkage. RESULTS: In 361 patients, aneurysm sac shrinkage of 10 mm or more was measured in 152 (42.1%) patients. Patients with ≥10-mm aneurysm shrinkage had fewer endoleaks (4.3% vs. 24.6%, P<0.0001) and fewer re-interventions for endoleak (3.0% vs. 10.1%, P=0.007). Aneurysm sac shrinkage was correlated with the absence of endoleak development (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.19-0.66, P=0.001). In patients who had achieved ≥10-mm shrinkage of the aneurysm sac, no further significant growth was seen, compared to 38 (15.3%) patients who did not attain size reduction (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Once patients achieve ≥10-mm aneurysm sac shrinkage, they are less prone to developing subsequent aneurysm growth and have significantly lower risk of requiring surgery for endoleaks. However, a small number of patients remain at risk of requiring endoleak surgery after aneurysm shrinkage. Therefore, we would not recommend ceasing life-long imaging follow-up after significant aneurysm sac shrinkage, though it might be safe to increase the interval of follow-up.

Peri-Operative Nasal Eradication Therapy Prevents Staphylococcus aureus Surgical Site Infections in Aortoiliac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) cause considerable morbidity and deaths among patients undergoing vascular surgery. Pre-operative screening and subsequent treatment of nasal Staphylococcus aureus carriers with mupirocin and chlorhexidine reduces the risk of SSIs in cardiothoracic and orthopedic surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of this screen-and-treat strategy on the development of SSI in patients undergoing aortoiliac surgery. METHODS: A prospective study was performed that enrolled an intervention cohort comprising all patients undergoing aortoiliac surgery from February 2013 to December 2016. Before surgery, patients were screened for S. aureus nasal carriage and, if positive, were treated with mupirocin nasal ointment and chlorhexidine body washes. The presence of SSI was recorded on the basis of the criteria of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A historic control group was used, consisting of aortoiliac surgery patients in 2010 who tested positive for S. aureus but received no treatment. RESULTS: A total of 374 patients in the study cohort were screened of whom 75 (20.1%) tested positive for S. aureus. Of these patients, 68 were given eradication therapy. In the 2010 cohort, 22 patients (15.7%) were positive. The incidence of S. aureus infection was 0 of 75 in the treatment group versus 3 of 22 (13.6%) in the control group (p = 0.021). Both the 30-day mortality rate (1.3% vs. 13.6%; p = 0.035) and the rate of re-interventions (12.0% vs. 31.8%) were significantly lower in the treated group. CONCLUSION: We conclude that S. aureus nasal screening and eradication with mupirocin and chlorhexidine reduces S. aureus SSI and its complications after aortoiliac surgery.

First experience of a novel femorocrural expanded polytetrafluoroethylene bypass graft.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate early results of a precuffed expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) Distaflo® Mini-Cuff Bypass Graft versus autologous saphenous vein (ASV) grafting in patients with peripheral arterial obstructive disease (PAOD). METHODS: This retrospective single-center study analyzed 42 patients who received a femorocrural bypass graft because of PAOD using an ASV graft (n = 28) or Distaflo Mini-Cuff graft (n = 14). RESULTS: Primary patency rates in the ASV and Distaflo Mini-Cuff groups were 81% and 69%, respectively, after 6 months. Secondary patency rates were 81% and 35%, respectively, after 12 months. The limb salvage rate was 81% in the ASV group vs 65% and 35%, respectively, in the Distaflo Mini-Cuff group after 6 months and 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: The ePTFE Distaflo Mini-Cuff is an option for revascularization in the absence of a suitable ASV. However, the performance of this novel graft is not better than that of current ePTFE bypass grafts.

Magnetic resonance imaging reveals edema-like changes not only subcutaneously, but also in muscle tissue after femoropopliteal bypass surgery.

BACKGROUND: The pathophysiological mechanisms that induce postrevascularization edema after femoropopliteal bypass surgery are not completely understood. Reperfusion-associated injury to revascularized tissue and damage to lymphatic structures are both likely to play a role. Aim of this study was to study edema formation after peripheral bypass surgery with magnetic resonance imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine patients suffering from severe peripheral arterial occlusive disease were subjected to magnetic resonance imaging scans before and 1 week after autologous femoropopliteal or femorocrural bypass surgery. RESULTS: A 12% increase in volume of the upper legs and an 11% increase in volume of the lower legs were measured in patients postoperatively. The increase of volume was largely due to expansion of the subcutaneous compartments: a 35% increase in the upper legs and a 41% increase in the lower legs. Edema in the upper legs was predominantly located medially at the site of the surgical wound. In contrast, edema in the lower legs was homogenously distributed around the entire leg circumference. The muscle compartment showed no significant change of volume. However, in the majority of patients, edema-like changes were seen in selected muscles as well after a peripheral bypass reconstruction. CONCLUSION: Swelling of the subcutaneous compartments is mainly responsible for the volume increases in upper and lower legs similar to lymphatic edema. In addition, in a majority of patients, edema-like changes in selected muscles were seen especially in the upper legs. Reperfusion-associated injury as a cause of these changes cannot be ruled out.

Quality of life in perspective to treatment of postoperative edema after peripheral bypass surgery.

BACKGROUND: To examine the effects of peripheral bypass surgery on patients' quality of life (QoL) as well as to compare two treatment modalities to reduce postoperative edema with regard to patients' QoL. METHODS: This was a randomized controlled trial set in the department of vascular surgery in a nonacademic teaching hospital. Ninety-three patients (mean age, 70 years; 33% Rutherford 5-6), enrolled between August 2006 and September 2009, who underwent peripheral bypass surgery (autologous 57, polytetrafluoroethylene 36). Patients were assigned to intermittent pneumatic compression (n = 46) or to compression stockings (n = 47). The main outcome measure was QoL, measured with the World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment instrument (short form: WHOQOL-BREF). RESULTS: QoL improved on the domain of Physical Health by 7.18 points (P < 0.001 [range, 0-100]) after 2 weeks and by 10.03 points (P < 0.001) after 3 months. Patients who received a polytetrafluoroethylene bypass scored 0.45 points (P = 0.0008 [range, 1-5]) lower at baseline on Global QoL than patients who received an autologous bypass. Type of bypass or edema treatment method did not affect the improvements. Edema did not correlate with QoL. CONCLUSION: Improvement in QoL on the domain Physical Health following femoropopliteal bypass surgery was found as soon as 2 weeks after surgery. Improvement in QoL domains was not influenced by the type of bypass reconstruction. No specific effects of edema on QoL were detected.

Remote endarterectomy versus supragenicular bypass surgery for long occlusions of the superficial femoral artery: medium-term results of a randomized controlled trial (the REVAS trial).

BACKGROUND: To investigate the optimal surgical treatment, remote superficial femoral artery endarterectomy (RSFAE) or supragenicular bypass, for Transatlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) C and D lesions of the superficial femoral artery. Medium-term results will be presented. METHODS: The study randomized 116 patients, 61 to RSFAE and 55 to supragenicular bypass surgery. Indications for surgery were claudication in 77, rest pain in 21, or tissue loss in 18. RESULTS: Primary patency after 3 years of follow-up was 47% for RSFAE and 60% for bypass (p = 0.107), assisted primary patency was 63 and 69% (p = 0.406), and secondary patency was 69 and 73% (p = 0.541), respectively. For venous (n = 25) and prosthetic grafts (n = 30) at 3-year follow-up, primary patency was 65% and 56 versus 47% for RSFAE (p = 0.143), assisted primary patency was 84% and 56 versus 63% for RSFAE (p = 0.052), and secondary patency was 89% and 59 versus 69% for RSFAE (p = 0.046), respectively. Limb salvage was 97% after RSFAE and 95% after bypass surgery (p = 0.564). CONCLUSION: RSFAE is a minimally invasive option for surgical repair of TASC C and D superficial femoral artery obstructions, with assisted primary and secondary patency rates comparable with bypass surgery. Venous bypass grafting is superior to both RSFAE and polytetrafluoroethylene grafting, but only 45% of patients had a sufficient saphenous vein available. If the saphenous vein is not applicable, RSFAE should be considered because it is less invasive and prosthetic graft material can be avoided.