Migration and clinical outcome of mobile-bearing versus fixed-bearing single-radius total knee arthroplasty.

Background and purpose - Mobile-bearing total knee prostheses (TKPs) were developed in the 1970s in an attempt to increase function and improve implant longevity. However, modern fixed-bearing designs like the single-radius TKP may provide similar advantages. We compared tibial component migration measured with radiostereometric analysis (RSA) and clinical outcome of otherwise similarly designed cemented fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing single-radius TKPs. Patients and methods - RSA measurements and clinical scores were assessed in 46 randomized patients at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and annually thereafter up to 6 years postoperatively. A linear mixed-effects model was used to analyze the repeated measurements. Results - Both groups showed comparable migration (p = 0.3), with a mean migration at 6-year follow-up of 0.90 mm (95% CI 0.49-1.41) for the fixed-bearing group compared with 1.22 mm (95% CI 0.75-1.80) for the mobile-bearing group. Clinical outcomes were similar between groups. 1 fixed-bearing knee was revised for aseptic loosening after 6 years and 2 knees (1 in each group) were revised for late infection. 2 knees (1 in each group) were suspected for loosening due to excessive migration. Another mobile-bearing knee was revised after an insert dislocation due to failure of the locking mechanism 6 weeks postoperatively, after which study inclusion was preliminary terminated. Interpretation - Fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing single-radius TKPs showed similar migration. The latter may, however, expose patients to more complex surgical techniques and risks such as insert dislocations inherent to this rotating-platform design.

Polyethylene thickness is a risk factor for wear necessitating insert exchange.

PURPOSE: The aim of this observational study was to investigate the optimal minimal polyethylene (PE) thickness in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and identify other risk factors associated with revision of the insert due to wear. METHODS: A total of 84 TKA were followed for 11-16 years. All patients received the same prosthesis design (Interax; Howmedica/ Stryker) with halfbearings: separate PE-inserts medially and laterally. Statistical analysis comprised Cox-regression to correct for confounding. RESULTS: Eight knees (9.5%) had been revised due to thinning inserts and an additional patient is scheduled for revision. PE thickness, diagnosis, BMI and weight are risk factors for insert exchange. For each millimetre decrease in PE thickness, the risk of insert exchange increases 3.0 times, which remains after correction for age, gender, weight, diagnosis and femoral-tibial angle. Insert exchange was 4.73 times more likely in OA-patients compared to RA-patients. For every unit increase in BMI and weight the risk for insert exchange increases 1.40 times and 1.14 times, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion we therefore advise against the use of thin PE inserts in modular TKA and recommend PE inserts with a minimal 8-mm thickness.

AQUILA: assessment of quality in lower limb arthroplasty. An expert Delphi consensus for total knee and total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: In the light of both the importance and large numbers of case series and cohort studies (observational studies) in orthopaedic literature, it is remarkable that there is currently no validated measurement tool to appraise their quality. A Delphi approach was used to develop a checklist for reporting quality, methodological quality and generalizability of case series and cohorts in total hip and total knee arthroplasty with a focus on aseptic loosening. METHODS: A web-based Delphi was conducted consisting of two internal rounds and three external rounds in order to achieve expert consensus on items considered relevant for reporting quality, methodological quality and generalizability. RESULTS: The internal rounds were used to construct a master list. The first external round was completed by 44 experts, 35 of them completed the second external round and 33 of them completed the third external round. Consensus was reached on an 8-item reporting quality checklist, a 6-item methodological checklist and a 22-item generalizability checklist. CONCLUSIONS: Checklist for reporting quality, methodological quality and generalizability for case series and cohorts in total hip and total knee arthroplasty were successfully created through this Delphi. These checklists should improve the accuracy, completeness and quality of case series and cohorts regarding total hip and total knee arthroplasty.

A computed tomography based study on rotational alignment accuracy of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery.

Rotation of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is of high importance in respect of the balancing of the knee and the patellofemoral joint. Though it is shown that computer assisted surgery (CAOS) improves the anteroposterior (AP) alignment in TKA, it is still unknown whether navigation helps in finding the accurate rotation or even improving rotation. Therefore the aim of our study was to evaluate the postoperative femoral component rotation on computed tomography (CT) with the intraoperative data of the navigation system. In 20 navigated TKAs the difference between the intraoperative stored rotation data of the femoral component and the postoperative rotation on CT was measured using the condylar twist angle (CTA). This is the angle between the epicondylar axis and the posterior condylar axis. Statistical analysis consisted of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plot. The mean intraoperative rotation CTA based on CAOS was 3.5° (range 2.4-8.6°). The postoperative CT scan showed a mean CTA of 4.0° (1.7-7.2). The ICC between the two observers was 0.81, and within observers this was 0.84 and 0.82, respectively. However, the ICC of the CAOS CTA versus the postoperative CT CTA was only 0.38. Though CAOS is being used for optimising the position of a TKA, this study shows that the (virtual) individual rotational position of the femoral component using a CAOS system is significantly different from the position on a postoperative CT scan.

Transepicondylar axis accuracy in computer assisted knee surgery: a comparison of the CT-based measured axis versus the CAS-determined axis.

Rotational malalignment is recognized as one of the major reasons for knee pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Although Computer Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery (CAOS) systems have been developed to enable more accurate and consistent alignment of implants, it is still unknown whether they significantly improve the accuracy of femoral rotational alignment as compared to conventional techniques. We evaluated the accuracy of the intraoperatively determined transepicondylar axis (TEA) with that obtained from postoperative CT-based measurement in 20 navigated TKA procedures. The intraoperatively determined axis was marked with tantalum (RSA) markers. Two observers measured the posterior condylar angle (PCA) on postoperative CT scans. The PCA measured using the intraoperatively determined axis showed an inter-observer correlation of 0.93. The intra-observer correlation, 0.96, was slightly better than when using the CT-based angle. The PCA had a range of -6 degrees (internal rotation) to 8 degrees (external rotation) with a mean of 3.6 degrees for observer 1 (SD = 4.02 degrees ) and 2.8 degrees for observer 2 (SD = 3.42 degrees ). The maximum difference between the two observers was 4 degrees . All knees had a patellar component inserted with good patellar tracking and no anterior knee pain. The mean postoperative flexion was 113 degrees (SD = 12.9 degrees ). The mean difference between the two epicondylar line angles was 3.1 degrees (SD = 5.37 degrees ), with the CT-based PCA being larger. During CT-free navigation in TKA, a systematic error of 3 degrees arose when determining the TEA. It is emphasized that the intraoperative epicondylar axis is different from the actual CT-based epicondylar axis.

Results of surgical versus non-surgical treatment of Achilles tendon rupture.

Between 1990 and 2001, 292 patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture were admitted to our institution. Depending on the day of admission patients were allocated either to the Department of Trauma Surgery or to the Department of Orthopaedics. Two hundred and twelve patients (mean age 37+/-9.4 years) were treated with surgical suture followed by plaster for 6 weeks. Eighty patients were treated non-surgically with splinting for 12 weeks. For both groups mean follow-up was 6+/-3 years. There were 14 re-ruptures, ten after surgical repair and four after non-surgical treatment. In the surgical group there were seven major wound problems, 11 minor wound complications and six patients with complaints from the sural nerve. In the non-surgical group one patient suffered a pulmonary embolism after a re-rupture, 3 months after the initial rupture. There was no difference in mean ankle score and patient-satisfaction score between groups. Only 52% regained their original sports activity level, slightly better in the surgically treated group. With a non-significant difference in re-rupture rate but relatively more complications after surgical repair, non-surgical treatment is preferred. With a slightly better recovery of sports activity after surgical repair, this might be used as an argument for surgical treatment in young athletes.