Role of Delay Between Injury and Surgery on the Outcomes of Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes of rotator cuff repair (RCR) are influenced by several well-described factors, but the role of delay from injury to surgery on the outcomes is not clear. PURPOSE: To assess the role of delay to surgery on the outcomes of RCR in the literature. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed. All studies assessing outcomes after RCR-either retear rates or patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)-and reporting delay to surgery were identified through June 2021 in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane. Inclusion criteria consisted of traumatic injuries, mean age <65 years, minimum 6-month follow-up, and assessment of retear rates with radiologic examination or reporting of PROMs. Random-effect models were used to assess outcomes, reported in odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% CIs. RESULTS: A total of 8118 patients were included from 33 studies, with a mean age of 59 years (range, 53-64) and mean follow-up of 3.0 years (range, 0.5-8.2), among whom 53% were male and 74% had dominant-side injury. Patients undergoing surgery >3 months after injury did not have significantly higher retear rates (OR, 1.1 [95% CI, 0.5 to 3.1]; P = .700), lower Constant-Murley score (MD, -6.2 [95% CI, -16.4 to 4.1]; P = .240), or lower ASES score (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons; MD, -12.9 [95% CI, -26.0 to -0.2]; P = .050) compared with those having surgery within 3 months. Similarly, delaying surgery for 6 months did not result in higher retear rates (OR, 1.7 [95% CI, 0.8 to 3.7]; P = .190) or lower PROMs. Delaying surgery for 1 year, however, led to an increased likelihood of retear when compared with <1 year (OR, 2.9 [95% CI, 2.1 to 4.0]; P < .001), and this was similar for the 2-year cutoff (OR, 5.9 [95% CI, 1.1 to 32.1]; P = .040). It was also noted that patients with an intact cuff at follow-up had a mean 3.9 months' shorter time from injury to surgery than patients with retear (95% CI, 1.0-6.8 months; P = .009). CONCLUSION: This systematic review with meta-analysis found that delaying rotator cuff surgery for 3 to 6 months did not lead to higher retear rates or inferior PROMs as compared with undergoing earlier surgery. However, delaying surgery for ≥1 year clearly resulted in higher retear rates after RCR. This study is limited by relying on retrospective studies, and larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings. REGISTRATION: CRD42021240720 (PROSPERO).

Clinical outcome and structural integrity of all-arthroscopic repair of degenerative subscapularis tendon tears.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of all-arthroscopic repair of degenerative subscapularis tendon tears and post-operative structural integrity using magnetic resonance imaging with a short-term follow-up. METHODS: Twenty-one patients were treated all-arthroscopically for a full-thickness degenerative subscapularis tendon tear. Median patient age was 55 years (range, 41-69). Median follow-up was 25 months (range, 15-44). Patients were evaluated prior to surgery and at follow-up: active range of motion, VAS pain, Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score (DASH). At final follow-up, the Constant-Murley score was evaluated. RESULTS: Mean active range of motion showed significant post-operative improvement (p < 0.001). VAS pain improved from 8.3 (SD ± 1.3) pre-operatively to 2.7 (SD ± 1.8) post-operatively (<0.001); SST increased from 20 % (SD ± 26) pre-operatively to 83 % (SD ± 27) post-operatively (<0.001); DASH scores improved 67 (SD ± 19) to 18 (SD ± 21) post-operatively (<0.001). Post-operative Constant-Murley score was 79 (SD ± 12). Two patients had failure of the repair on post-operative MRI. Twelve cases (57 %) showed post-operative progression of fatty muscle infiltration. CONCLUSION: All-arthroscopic repair is an effective treatment modality for degenerative subscapularis tendon tears with an anterosuperior tear pattern with good clinical results and high patient satisfaction. Although there was a high tendon-to-bone healing rate, fatty muscle infiltration was progressive in more than half of the patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic case series, Level IV.

Arthroscopic side-to-side repair of massive and contracted rotator cuff tears using a single uninterrupted suture: the shoestring bridge technique.

PURPOSE: This study was performed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a new side-to-side repair technique for massive rotator cuff tears using a single uninterrupted suture in the configuration of a shoestring in a medial-to-lateral progression. METHODS: Thirty-one consecutive patients with a mean age of 59 years (SD, 4.7 years) had primary arthroscopic repair of their massive, U-shaped, contracted supraspinatus and infraspinatus tear by the shoestring bridge technique. Preoperatively and postoperatively, we measured active forward flexion and determined the visual analog scale score for pain, Simple Shoulder Test score, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score. Repair integrity was evaluated by ultrasonography. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 26.5 months, all scores had significantly improved: active forward flexion, mean of 70° (SD, 29°) preoperatively to 139° (SD, 39°) postoperatively (P < .001); visual analog scale score for pain, 8.0 ± 1.4 points to 2.5 ± 1.8 points (P < .001); Simple Shoulder Test score, 15% ± 19% to 72% ± 23% (P < .001); and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, 62 ± 17 points to 21 ± 14 points (P < .001). Ultrasound evaluation showed that 25 of 31 patients (81%) had heeled tendons. Of 31 patients, 6 (19%) had a complete retear. Only 3 of these 6 patients were not satisfied with the result. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic side-to-side repair by the shoestring bridge technique is effective in the treatment of massive, U-shaped, contracted supraspinatus and infraspinatus tears. It provides the shoulder surgeon a treatment modality with significant improvement in pain and function, high patient satisfaction, and a low retear rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.