ABSTRACT
Low-cost dual-frequency receivers and antennas have created opportunities for a wide range of new applications, in regions and disciplines where traditional GNSS equipment is unaffordable. However, the major drawback of using low-cost antenna equipment is that antenna phase patterns are typically poorly defined. Therefore, the noise in tropospheric zenith delay and coordinate time series is increased and systematic errors may occur. Here, we present a field calibration method that fully relies on low-cost solutions. It does not require costly software, uses low-cost equipment (~500 Euros), requires limited specialist expertise, and takes complex processing steps into the cloud. The application is more than just a relative antenna calibration: it is also a means to assess the quality and performance of the antenna, whether this is at a calibration site or directly in the field. We cover PCV calibrations, important for deformation monitoring, GNSS meteorology and positioning, and the computation of PCOs when the absolute position is of interest. The method is made available as an online web service. The performance of the calibration method is presented for a range of antennas of different quality and price in combination with a low-cost dual-frequency receiver. Carrier phase residuals of the low-cost antennas are reduced by 11-34% on L1 and 19-39% on L2, depending on the antenna type and ground plane used. For the cheapest antenna, when using a circular ground plane, the L1 residual is reduced from 3.85 mm before to 3.41 mm after calibration, and for L2 from 5.34 mm to 4.3 mm. The calibration reduces the Median Absolute Deviations (MADs) of the low-cost antennas in the vertical direction using Post Processed Kinematic (PPK) by 20-24%. For the cheapest antenna, the MAD is reduced from 5.6 to 3.8 mm, comparable to a geodetic-grade antenna (3.5 mm MAD). The calibration also has a positive impact on the Precise Point Positioning (PPP) results, delivering more precise results and reducing height biases.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: It is estimated that one third of the institutes applying clinical beta sources does not perform independent dosimetry. The Netherlands commission on radiation dosimetry (NCS) recently published recommended quality control procedures and detectors for the dosimetry of beta sources. The main issues of NCS Report 14 are summarized here. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A dosimetry survey was performed among 23 institutes in The Netherlands and Belgium. Well ionization chambers, a plastic scintillator, plane-parallel ionization chamber, diode and radiochromic film were used for determination of source strength (dose rate at reference distance) and uniformity of intravascular and ophthalmic sources. The source strength of multiple sources of each type was measured and compared with the source strength specified by the manufacturer. RESULTS: The standard deviation of the difference between measured and specified source strength was mostly about 3%, but varied between 0.8 and 15.8% depending on factors such as source type, detector, phantom and manufacturers calibration. The average non-uniformity was about 7% for intravascular sources and 20% for ophthalmic sources. It is estimated that the total relative standard uncertainty can be kept below +/-4% (1 sigma) with all detectors tested. Maximum deviations in source strength of 10% and a non-uniformity below 10% (intravascular) and 30% (ophthalmic) are recommended. CONCLUSIONS: Dosimetric and non-dosimetric quality control procedures on beta sources are recommended. They enable standardized measurements, including the determination of relative source strength and non-uniformity. Absolute calibrations depend on the future introduction of primary standards for clinical beta sources.
