In Patients with an α-Galactosidase A Variant, Small Nerve Fibre Assessment Cannot Confirm a Diagnosis of Fabry Disease.

BACKGROUND: Fabry disease (FD) is an X-linked lysosomal storage disorder caused by an α-galactosidase A enzyme deficiency due to pathogenic variants in the α-galactosidase A gene (GLA). An increasing number of individuals with a GLA variant, but without characteristic FD features, are identified. A definite diagnosis of FD has important consequences for treatment and counselling. OBJECTIVES: We assessed the diagnostic value of quantitative sensory testing (QST) and intraepidermal nerve fibre density (IENFD) for patients with an uncertain FD diagnosis. METHODS: All patients with a GLA variant who initially presented at the Academic Medical Center with an uncertain FD diagnosis were included. A biopsy of an affected organ in a patient or family member showing FD characteristic storage is used as a reference standard for a diagnosis of FD. All patients underwent a comprehensive QST protocol and IENFD assessment which was compared to age and gender-matched healthy controls. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for a combination of ≥1 abnormal QST modality and an abnormal IENFD. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients participated (nonclassical FD n = 18, 9 males; no FD n = 5, 3 males; uncertain n = 3, 1 male). Of the patients classified as nonclassical FD, 28% had ≥1 abnormal QST modalities, and 83% had an abnormal IENFD. From the patients without FD, 20% had ≥1 abnormal QST modality, and IENFD was abnormal in 25% (1 not available). Sensitivity was 28% and specificity 80%. CONCLUSIONS: In our study cohort, QST and IENFD could not reliably distinguish patients with FD from those without FD.

Cornea verticillata supports a diagnosis of Fabry disease in non-classical phenotypes: results from the Dutch cohort and a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Screening for Fabry disease (FD) increasingly reveals individuals without characteristic features and with a variant of unknown significance in the α-galactosidase A (GLA) gene. Cornea verticillata (CV) assessment, as a characteristic sign of FD, may be a valuable diagnostic tool to assess whether these individuals have a non-classical phenotype or no FD at all. METHODS: We performed a systematic review to estimate the prevalence of CV in FD. Additionally, CV prevalence was assessed in the Dutch FD cohort. Data were stratified by gender and phenotype (classical, non-classical, uncertain, no-FD) using predefined criteria. RESULTS: CV was assessed in 21 cohorts (n=753, 330 men, age 0-85 years). Pooled prevalence was 69% (74% men, 66% women). In six studies, 77 (19 men) individuals with a non-classical or uncertain diagnosis were identified. Individual data were available in 4/6 studies (n=66, 16 men). CV was present in 24% (n=16, 2 men). 101 (35 men) subjects from the Dutch cohort were grouped as classical, of whom 86% (94% men, 82% women including five women who used amiodarone) had CV. Of the 25 (11 men) non-classical patients, 4 (three men) had CV. Subjects in the uncertain and no-FD groups did not have CV. CONCLUSIONS: CV is related to classical or biopsy-proven non-classical FD, with a very high sensitivity in classical men. Thus, presence of CV in an individual with an uncertain diagnosis of FD indicates a pathogenic GLA variant, in the absence of medication that may induce CV; if CV is absent, FD cannot be excluded.

Plasma globotriaosylsphingosine in relation to phenotypes of Fabry disease.

BACKGROUND: Fabry disease (FD), a lysosomal storage disorder caused by α-galactosidase A (GLA) gene variants, has a heterogeneous phenotype. GLA variants can lead to classical FD, an attenuated non-classical phenotype, or no disease at all. This study investigates the value of plasma globotriaosylsphingosine (lysoGb3) to distinguish between these groups. This is of particular importance in the diagnosis of individuals with a GLA variant and an uncertain diagnosis of FD, lacking characteristic features of classical FD. METHODS: Subjects with GLA variants were grouped as classical, non-classical, uncertain or no FD, using strict phenotypical, biochemical and histological criteria. Plasma lysoGb3 was assessed by LC/MS/MS (normal ≤ 0.6 nmol/L). RESULTS: 154 subjects were grouped into classical (38 males (M), 66 females (F)), non-classical (13 M, 14 F), uncertain (5M, 9 F) or no FD (6M, 3F). All subjects with a classical phenotype had elevated lysoGb3 values (M: range 45-150, F: 1.5-41.5). LysoGb3 values in patients with a non-classical phenotype (M: 1.3-35.7, F: 0.5-2.0) were different from healthy controls (M: p<0.01, F: p<0.05), but females overlapped with controls. In the no-FD group, lysoGb3 was normal. CONCLUSIONS: LysoGb3 is a reliable diagnostic tool to discern classical FD from subjects without FD. This study suggests that the same applies to patients with a non-classical phenotype. LysoGb3 values of female patients overlap with controls. Consequently, in uncertain cases, increased lysoGb3 values are very suggestive for FD, but normal values cannot exclude FD. Confirmation in larger cohorts and data on the specificity of small lysoGb3 increases are necessary.

Chronic kidney disease and an uncertain diagnosis of Fabry disease: approach to a correct diagnosis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Screening for Fabry disease (FD), an X-linked lysosomal storage disorder, reveals a significant number of individuals with a genetic variant of unknown significance without classical FD manifestations; these variants in the α-galactosidase A gene often result in a high residual leukocyte α-galactosidase A and it is unclear whether these individuals suffer from FD. Therefore, a structured diagnostic approach is warranted. We present a diagnostic algorithm on how to approach adults with chronic kidney disease and an uncertain diagnosis of FD nephropathy. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND MEASUREMENTS: A modified Delphi procedure was conducted to reach consensus among 11 FD experts. A systematic review was performed to identify possible criteria that could confirm or exclude FD nephropathy. RESULTS: The gold standard for FD nephropathy was defined as characteristic storage on electron microscopy (EM) in a kidney biopsy in the absence of medication that may induce similar storage. The suggested criteria to confirm FD nephropathy are as follows: 'renal cysts', 'Maltese cross sign', 'immunohistochemical staining of Gb3 in urine' and 'high urinary Gb3'; and to exclude FD nephropathy: 'absence of renal cysts', 'small kidneys' and 'high protein excretion' were rejected because of low or uncertain specificity. Urinary Gb3 may be increased in other kidney diseases and there was no agreement on this criterion, although a third of the panel indicated that it is sufficient to diagnose FD nephropathy. The 'Maltese cross sign' and 'high urinary Gb3' were selected as red flags to suggest the possibility of FD nephropathy, but are not sufficient for a definite diagnosis of FD nephropathy. CONCLUSIONS: In adults with chronic kidney disease, an α-galactosidase A gene variant and an uncertain diagnosis of FD, a kidney biopsy with EM analysis should be performed to confirm or reject the diagnosis of FD nephropathy. Other criteria currently cannot substitute for a biopsy in these cases.

Plasma and urinary levels of dermatan sulfate and heparan sulfate derived disaccharides after long-term enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) in MPS I: correlation with the timing of ERT and with total urinary excretion of glycosaminoglycans.

INTRODUCTION: Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I) results in a defective breakdown of the glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) heparan sulfate and dermatan sulfate, which leads to a progressive disease. Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) results in clearance of these GAGs from a range of tissues and can significantly ameliorate several symptoms. The biochemical efficacy of ERT is generally assessed by the determination of the total urinary excretion of GAGs. However, this has limitations. We studied the concentrations of heparan sulfate and dermatan sulfate derived disaccharides (HS and DS, respectively) in the plasma and urine of seven patients and compared these levels with total urinary GAGs (uGAGs) levels. METHODS: Plasma and urine samples were collected at different time points relative to the weekly ERT for three non-consecutive weeks in seven MPS I patients who had been treated with ERT for at least 2.5 years. Heparan and dermatan sulfate in plasma and urine were enzymatically digested into disaccharides, and HS and DS levels were determined by HPLC-MS/MS analysis. uGAGs were measured by the DMB test. RESULTS: The levels of HS and DS were markedly decreased compared with the levels before the initiation of ERT. However, the concentrations of DS in plasma and of both HS and DS in urine remained significantly elevated in all studied patients, while in six patients the level of total uGAGs had normalized. The concentrations of plasma and urinary HS during the weekly ERT followed a U-shaped curve. However, the effect size is small. The concentrations of plasma and urinary DS and uGAGs appeared to be in a steady state. CONCLUSIONS: HS and DS are sensitive biomarkers for monitoring the biochemical treatment efficacy of ERT and remain elevated despite long-term treatment. This finding may be related to the labeled dose or antibody status of the patient. The timing of the sample collection is not relevant, at least at the current dose of 100 IU/kg/weekly.