Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Neth J Med ; 73(3): 119-23, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25852111

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The standardised mortality ratio (SMR) is a quality indicator used to measure quality of care in the Netherlands. It is subject to much criticism, which was the reason to study the value of the SMR as a quality indicator for the treatment of acute leukaemia. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed in patients with acute leukaemia admitted to a Santeon hospital during the period 2005-2009. SMR values were calculated and compared with the overall survival (OS). RESULTS: During the study period, 455 unique patients were admitted with acute leukaemia. SMR calculation was based on 992 admissions. SMR analysis yielded a high mortality ratio in hospital 1, 2, 3 and 4 in comparison with the national average (100), significant for hospital 1 and 4 (180 [CI 95% 126-257] and 187 [CI 95% 134-261], respectively) OS analysis also showed a significantly different outcome between hospitals. However, using OS as outcome parameter, hospital 2 and 6 showed the lowest performance as compared with hospital 1 and 4 using SMR as parameter. After multivariate analysis, age (HR 1.04; CI 95% 1.03-1.05; p < 0.001) and hospital (hospital 5 compared with 6: HR 0.54; CI 95% 0.30- .98; p = 0.043; hospital 2 compared with 1: HR 1.51; CI 95% 1.02-2.23; p = 0.039) were the only significant variables that influenced OS. CONCLUSION: Outcome according to SMR is not equivalent to outcome according to OS. This study shows that the use of the SMR as a quality indicator for the treatment of acute leukaemia does not appear to be justified.


Subject(s)
Disease Management , Leukemia/mortality , Leukemia/therapy , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Acute Disease , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Hospital Mortality/trends , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate/trends , Young Adult
2.
Neth J Med ; 71(9): 472-7, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24218421

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Influenza virus vaccination is recommended for patients treated with chemotherapy. Little is known about vaccination coverage in these patients. METHODS: Vaccination coverage in the Netherlands was analysed by questionnaires completed by general practitioners, within a catchment area of 1.3 million people, in the period 2010-2011. RESULTS: Of 433 eligible adult patients treated with chemotherapy for breast or colorectal cancer, 144 patients gave permission for us to approach their general practitioner with a questionnaire. General practitioners were asked about vaccination coverage, awareness of recommendations and their opinion about the responsibility for vaccination. We received 114 (79%) completed questionnaires. Sixty-seven out of 114 patients (59%) were vaccinated against influenza. Forty-four (66%) of these patients also had an indication for vaccination based on age (age ≥60 years). According to 48% of the general practitioners, the responsibility for vaccination belongs to the competence of the treating medical oncologist. CONCLUSION: Influenza vaccination coverage is limited to 59% of patients treated with chemotherapy. Guidelines for responsibility (general practitioner or medical oncologist) may increase the vaccination rate of cancer patients.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/immunology , Colorectal Neoplasms/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Female , General Practitioners/psychology , General Practitioners/statistics & numerical data , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza, Human/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Vaccine ; 31(52): 6177-84, 2013 Dec 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24176495

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Higher rates of hospitalization and mortality are described in oncology patients with influenza virus infection compared to the general population. Yearly influenza vaccination is recommended for patients treated with chemotherapy. The optimal moment to administer the vaccine during a treatment cycle has not been studied extensively. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During the influenza season 2011-2012 we conducted a multicenter randomized controlled trial (OFLUVAC, NTR2858, no sponsoring) in the Netherlands. Patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for breast or colorectal cancer were randomized between early (day 5 after chemotherapy) and late (day 16 after chemotherapy) vaccination with the influenza virus vaccine (Influvac(®) 2011/2012-Vaxigrip(®) 2011/2012). Influenza virus-specific antibody titres were determined before, 3 and 12 weeks after vaccination by haemagglutination inhibition. RESULTS: Thirty-eight breast cancer patients (early=21; late=17) and 18 colorectal cancer patients (early=8; late=10) were analyzed. In breast cancer patients overall serologic responses were adequate. A statistically significant higher response in patients who received early compared to late vaccination in the chemotherapy cycle was observed. Geometric mean titres post vaccination on day 5 versus day 16 were 69.3 versus 27.4 (H3N2), 76.4 versus 17.5 (H1N1) and 34.4 versus 26.0 (B/Brisbane), respectively. In colorectal cancer patients overall serologic responses were adequate, no significant difference was found between early and late vaccination. Geometric mean titres post vaccination on day 5 versus day 16 were 170.1 versus 192.4 (H3N2), 233.0 versus 280.8 (H1N1) and 62.6 versus 75.9 (B/Brisbane), respectively. CONCLUSION: Overall antibody response to the influenza virus vaccine in patients treated with chemotherapy for breast or colorectal cancer patients is adequate. Breast cancer patients seem to mount the best antibody response when vaccinated early after a chemotherapy cycle (≤day 5). No difference was found between early and late vaccination in colorectal cancer patients.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Vaccination/methods , Adult , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/immunology , Colorectal Neoplasms/immunology , Female , Humans , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Serum/immunology
4.
Ann Oncol ; 22(9): 2031-2035, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21303799

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients receiving chemotherapy are at increased risk for influenza virus infection. Little is known about the preferred moment of vaccination during chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Breast cancer patients received influenza vaccination during FEC (5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide)-containing chemotherapy regimens. Patients were randomised for early (day 4) or late (day 16) vaccination during the chemotherapy cycle. Influenza virus-specific antibody titres were determined before and 3 weeks after vaccination by haemagglutination inhibition. RESULTS: We included 38 breast cancer patients (20 in the early and 18 in the late group) and 21 healthy controls. The overall patient group had significant lower responses to the vaccine compared with healthy controls. Patients vaccinated at day 4 tended to have higher antibody titres as compared with patients vaccinated at day 16, although the difference in post-vaccination titres is not statistically significant. Geometric mean titres post-vaccination for day 4 versus day 16 were 63.7 versus 29.5 (H3N2), 28.2 versus 19.6 (H1N1) and 29.8 versus 16.0 (B/Brisbane), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients on chemotherapy have significantly lower responses to influenza virus vaccination compared with healthy controls. Vaccination early during the chemotherapy cycle induces better responses than does vaccination at day 16 of the cycle. Follow-up studies are needed to confirm this effect.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/immunology , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza Vaccines/immunology , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Breast Neoplasms/virology , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Drug Administration Schedule , Epirubicin/administration & dosage , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Humans , Immunization Schedule , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/immunology , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype/immunology , Influenza B virus/immunology , Middle Aged
5.
Neth J Med ; 68(6): 261-4, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20558856

ABSTRACT

Intravascular large B-cell lymphoma (IVLBCL) is a rare and aggressive variant of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with frequent involvement of the central nervous system. Its atypical presentation often delays the diagnosis and due to its aggressive behaviour, the diagnosis is made post-mortem in half of the cases. We report a case of a 67-year-old male patient presenting with speech difficulties and balance disturbances in whom a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan showed multiple lesions of the white matter, denoted as embolic infarctions. He was treated for a suspected endocarditis with antibiotics, but deteriorated neurologically with persistent fever. A consecutive FDG -PET /CT revealed an increased uptake in the adrenals, of which a biopsy showed IVLB CL. The patient was successfully treated with systemic R-CHOP with intrathecal methotrexate and achieved complete remission after six cycles of chemotherapy. The potential role of FDG-PET/CT is illustrated by this case leading to an exceptional diagnosis of IVLBCL.


Subject(s)
Cerebral Infarction/diagnosis , Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/diagnosis , Radiopharmaceuticals , Vascular Neoplasms/diagnosis , Aged , Cerebral Infarction/diagnostic imaging , Cerebral Infarction/etiology , Humans , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/complications , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/diagnostic imaging , Male , Positron-Emission Tomography , Vascular Neoplasms/complications , Vascular Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging
6.
Clin Genet ; 75(6): 537-43, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19320655

ABSTRACT

Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome is a hereditary syndrome characterized by benign disease of skin and lungs and a risk of malignant renal tumors. We describe a clinical and genetic study of a large Dutch family with a novel mutation in the FLCN gene. Renal cancer at very young age occurred in one branch of this family, while in other branches, cutaneous and pulmonary symptoms predominated. A variety of congenital anomalies and connective tissue abnormalities were observed, possibly associated with the gene mutation.


Subject(s)
Family , Kidney Neoplasms/diagnosis , Kidney Neoplasms/genetics , Adult , Age of Onset , Aged , Base Sequence , Carcinoma, Papillary/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Papillary/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Papillary/genetics , DNA/analysis , Female , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lung Diseases/diagnosis , Lung Diseases/genetics , Male , Middle Aged , Molecular Sequence Data , Pedigree , Pneumothorax/diagnosis , Pneumothorax/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/genetics , Sequence Deletion , Skin Abnormalities/diagnosis , Skin Abnormalities/genetics , Syndrome , Tumor Suppressor Proteins/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...