ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the most important cause of mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and is preceded by endothelial dysfunction. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) is a noninvasive technique for measuring endothelial dysfunction. We aimed to determine the effect of long-term statin therapy versus placebo on FMD in patients with type 2 diabetes without manifest CVD. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial was performed with 250 type 2 diabetic patients. Patients were given 0.4 mg cerivastatin or placebo daily. In August 2001, when cerivastatin was withdrawn from the market, the 0.4 mg cerivastatin was replaced by 20 mg simvastatin, without deblinding the study. The primary end point was the change in FMD, measured by B-mode ultrasound, after 2 years. RESULTS: Determinants of baseline FMD were diabetes duration, common carotid intima-media thickness, and brachial artery diameter. FMD at baseline was 1.51% in the placebo group and 1.66% in the statin group and did not change significantly after 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: The 2-year statin therapy had no effect on FMD in type 2 diabetes. Statin-induced improvement of cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes may be mediated through mechanisms other than increased nitric oxide availability.
Subject(s)
Blood Flow Velocity/drug effects , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/physiopathology , Endothelium, Vascular/physiopathology , Pyridines/pharmacology , Body Mass Index , Diabetic Angiopathies/prevention & control , Double-Blind Method , Endothelium, Vascular/diagnostic imaging , Endothelium, Vascular/drug effects , Female , Humans , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Male , Middle Aged , Placebos , Simvastatin/pharmacology , UltrasonographyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Coronary artery disease is the most important cause of mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes. We aimed to determine the prevalence of silent myocardial ischemia (SMI) and the effect of statin therapy on SMI in type 2 diabetic patients without manifest cardiovascular disease. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial was performed in 250 patients with type 2 diabetes without manifest cardiovascular disease. Patients were given either 0.4 mg cerivastatin or placebo daily. In August 2001, when cerivastatin was withdrawn from the market, cerivastatin 0.4 mg was replaced by 20 mg simvastatin without deblinding the study. The primary end point was the change in ischemic episodes, duration, and burden as measured by 48-h ambulatory electrocardiography (AECG) over 2 years. RESULTS: At baseline, 47 of 233 (20%) evaluable ambulatory electrocardiograms showed evidence of ischemia. After 2 years, there was a trend toward more ischemia in both treatment groups, without significant differences between the changes in ischemic parameters (episodes P = 0.498; duration P = 0.697; burden P = 0.798) in the two treatment groups. Cardiovascular events occurred in 12 patients in the placebo group and in two patients in the statin group (P = 0.006). There was no relationship between these cardiovascular events and the presence of SMI at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: SMI occurred in 20% of type 2 diabetes patients without manifest cardiovascular disease. There was no effect from 2 years of statin therapy on SMI. In contrast, we observed a significantly lower cardiovascular event rate on statin therapy. AECG may not be a proper tool for risk stratification in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Myocardial Ischemia/drug therapy , Pyridines/therapeutic use , Awareness , Body Mass Index , Ethnicity , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Ischemia/physiopathology , PlacebosABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the most important cause of mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes. We aimed to determine the effect of statin therapy versus placebo on the progression of carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) in type 2 diabetic patients without manifest CVD. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial was performed in 250 patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients were given either 0.4 mg cerivastatin or placebo daily. In August 2001, when cerivastatin was withdrawn from the market, 0.4 mg cerivastatin was replaced by 20 mg simvastatin without deblinding the study. The primary end point was the change of mean common carotid IMT, as measured by B-mode ultrasound, over 2 years. RESULTS: Common carotid IMT at baseline was 0.780 mm in the placebo group and 0.763 mm in the statin group and did not change significantly after 2 years. There was no significant difference in IMT change in any carotid segment between the groups. LDL cholesterol was reduced by 25% in the statin group and increased by 8% in the placebo group (P <0.001). Cardiovascular events occurred in 12 patients in the placebo group and two patients in the statin group (P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: There was no effect of 2 years' statin therapy on carotid IMT in type 2 diabetic subjects. The natural history of IMT in our patients was milder than anticipated. In contrast, we observed a significantly lower cardiovascular event rate on statin therapy. Prognostic tools other than IMT should be explored in this patient group.
