Navigating the challenges: a case report on managing a complicated postpartum course in type 3 von Willebrand disease with alloantibodies.

Background: Von Willebrand disease (VWD) type 3 is characterized by a complete deficiency of von Willebrand factor (VWF), resulting in a severe bleeding phenotype. Treatment often requires administration of VWF concentrates/factor (F)VIII. However, the development of alloantibodies is a rare complication, resulting in ineffective recovery and allergic reactions. Emicizumab, a bispecific antibody mimicking FVIII function, has emerged as a potential alternative, with promising results reported in several case reports. Key Clinical Question: Description of multiple approaches to control highly severe postpartum hemorrhage in type 3 VWD with alloantibodies, including off-label use of emicizumab. Clinical Approach: Here we present a 28-year-old patient with type 3 VWD and alloantibodies, known to have arthropathy of the right elbow. Previous immune tolerance induction was unsuccessful. Despite receiving negative pregnancy advice during preconception counseling, the patient became pregnant. Delivery was induced at 38 4/7 weeks with prostaglandin, and recombinant FVIIa (rFVIIa) was administered every 2 hours. Despite administration of rFVIIa, bleeding persisted, requiring manual placental removal and insertion of a Bakri balloon. Since bleeding persisted, plasma-derived VWF was administered with an initial excellent recovery and successful embolization of the uterine artery. Twelve days postpartum, she developed endometritis and recurrent vaginal bleeding treated with antibiotics, rFVIIa every 2 hours, and multiple erythrocyte transfusions. Plasma-derived VWF was administered but was complicated by anaphylaxis and no recovery. Due to persistent vaginal bleeding, reembolization of uterine arteries was performed and off-label emicizumab was initiated. Twenty-nine days postpartum, she developed septic shock requiring an abdominal hysterectomy, again complicated by severe bleeding necessitating direct intraabdominal packing after rFVIIa. A computed tomography scan 9 days postsurgery revealed thrombosis in the left iliac vein and asymptomatic pulmonary embolisms. rFVIIa was stopped and prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin was started. The patient was discharged 2 months after delivery on low-dose low-molecular-weight heparin, emicizumab, and antibiotics for an intra-abdominal abscess. During 2.5 years of emicizumab prophylaxis, she has had no rebleeding in her arthropathic right elbow. Conclusion: The current case emphasizes the postpartum clinical challenges of patients with type 3 VWD and alloantibodies. It underscores the potential role of emicizumab in maintaining hemostatic control.

Bleeding control improves after switching to emicizumab: Real-world experience of 177 children in the PedNet registry.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the rapid uptake of emicizumab in the paediatric haemophilia A (HA) population, real-world data on the safety and efficacy is limited. AIM: To report on bleeding and safety in paediatric patients receiving emicizumab prophylaxis. METHODS: Data were extracted from the multicentre prospective observational PedNet Registry (NCT02979119). Children with haemophilia A, and ≥50 FVIII exposures or inhibitors present receiving emicizumab maintenance therapy were analysed. Data were summarized as medians with interquartile range (IQR, P25-P75). Mean (95% confidence interval (CI)), annualized (joint) bleeding rate (A(J)BR) during emicizumab and ≤2 years before emicizumab prophylaxis were modelled and compared using negative binomial regression. RESULTS: Total of 177 patients started emicizumab at median 8.6 years (IQR 4.8-13.1), most had no FVIII inhibitors (64%). Follow up before emicizumab was median: 1.68 years (IQR: 1.24-1.90) and during emicizumab: 1.32 years (IQR: .94-2.11). In patients without inhibitors, mean ABR reduced after starting emicizumab from 2.41 (CI 1.98-2.95) to 1.11 (CI .90-1.36, p < .001), while AJBR reduced from.74 (CI .56-.98) to.31 (CI .21-.46, p < .001). Concordantly, in patients with inhibitors, mean ABR reduced from 5.08 (CI 4.08-6.38) to .75 (CI .56-1.01, p < .001), while AJBR reduced from 1.90 (CI 1.42-2.58) to .34 (CI .21-.56, p < .001). Five emicizumab-related adverse events were reported (3% of the cohort), including one patient with antidrug antibodies. CONCLUSION: This study showed improved bleeding control compared to previous treatment and a favourable safety profile during emicizumab therapy in paediatric haemophilia A patients.

DosEmi study protocol: a phase IV, multicentre, open-label, crossover study to evaluate non-inferiority of pharmacokinetic-guided reduced dosing compared with conventional dosing of emicizumab in people with haemophilia A.

INTRODUCTION: Emicizumab effectively prevents bleeding in people with haemophilia A (PwHA), but is a burden for national healthcare budgets and consequently may limit access. According to the drug label, dosing of emicizumab is based on body weight with fixed intervals of 7, 14 or 28 days, which leads to mean plasma concentrations of 55 µg/mL (SD 15 µg/mL). However, a moderate variability of concentrations and a minimal effective concentration of 30 µg/mL have been suggested in studies. Therefore, a dose of emicizumab that targets a trough concentration of 30 µg/mL is hypothesised to be equally effective as conventional dosing in the prevention of bleeding. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We designed a phase IV, multicentre, open-label, crossover study to evaluate non-inferiority of bleed control of ≥6 months on conventional dosing in comparison to ≥6 months on dose intervention. This dose intervention consists of reducing the dose of emicizumab to target a trough concentrations of 30 µg/mL using individual pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. Ninety-five PwHA aged >1 years who received conventional dosing of emicizumab for ≥12 months with good bleeding control during the last 6 months will be recruited from all Dutch haemophilia treatment centres. The study is powered to detect a clinically relevant decrease (risk difference) of 15% in the proportion of patients without treated bleeds during follow-up. Secondary endpoints are spontaneous joint or muscle bleeds, and annualised treated bleeding rates (using negative binomial regression). Cost-effectivity between conventional dosing and individualised PK-guided dosing of emicizumab will be compared. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The DosEmi study was approved by the Medical Ethics Review Committee NedMec of the University Medical Center of Utrecht, The Netherlands. Study results will be communicated through publications in international scientific journals and presentations at (inter)national conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EUCTR2021-004039-10-NL at https://trialsearch.who.int. PROTOCOL VERSION: V.4.1 on 28 October 2022 (DosEmi protocol_V4.1; NL81112.041.22).

The efficacy of the entire-vial dosing of emicizumab: Real-world evidence on plasma concentrations, bleeds, and drug waste.

Background: Prophylaxis with emicizumab provides effective bleeding protection in persons with hemophilia A (PwHA) but pressures healthcare budgets. The body weight-adjusted dosing at 7-, 14-, or 28-day intervals, according to the label, often mismatches the vial content. Entire-vial dosing resulted in therapeutic concentrations according to pharmacokinetic simulations and was introduced to avoid waste. Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of entire-vial dosing of emicizumab by investigating real-world evidence of plasma concentrations, bleeds, and drug waste. Methods: This is a single-center, observational study with PwHA receiving emicizumab in mg/kg doses according to label but dosing interval extrapolated to the nearest vial size. Patient characteristics and bleeds were compared 1 year before starting emicizumab and during emicizumab until January 2022. Concentrations were assessed at weeks 4, 12, and annually. The mean (95% CI) annualized bleed rates were compared by using negative binomial regression. Drug waste between label-based dosing and entire-vial dosing was compared. Results: A total of 112 individuals (94% severe phenotype and 9% positive FVIII inhibitors) were followed for a median of 56 weeks (interquartile range [IQR] 52-68) before and 51 weeks (IQR 29-75) after starting emicizumab. The median emicizumab dose was 5.9 (IQR 5.5-6.2) mg/kg/4 wk with median concentrations of 63 (IQR 51-80) µg/mL. The annualized bleed rate of treated bleeds before emicizumab was 3.6 (95% CI 2.9-4.4) and was 0.8 (95% CI 0.6-1.1) during emicizumab (P < .001). Drug waste was reduced by 9%. Conclusion: The entire-vial dosing of emicizumab is an attractive treatment option for PwHA leading to therapeutic plasma concentrations, good bleeding control, and drug waste avoidance.

Longitudinal assessment of anti-PGL-I serology in contacts of leprosy patients in Bangladesh.

BACKGROUND: Despite elimination efforts, the number of Mycobacterium leprae (M. leprae) infected individuals who develop leprosy, is still substantial. Solid evidence exists that individuals living in close proximity to patients are at increased risk to develop leprosy. Early diagnosis of leprosy in endemic areas requires field-friendly tests that identify individuals at risk of developing the disease before clinical manifestation. Such assays will simultaneously contribute to reduction of current diagnostic delay as well as transmission. Antibody (Ab) levels directed against the M.leprae-specific phenolic glycolipid I (PGL-I) represents a surrogate marker for bacterial load. However, it is insufficiently defined whether anti-PGL-I antibodies can be utilized as prognostic biomarkers for disease in contacts. Particularly, in Bangladesh, where paucibacillary (PB) patients form the majority of leprosy cases, anti-PGL-I serology is an inadequate method for leprosy screening in contacts as a directive for prophylactic treatment. METHODS: Between 2002 and 2009, fingerstick blood from leprosy patients' contacts without clinical signs of disease from a field-trial in Bangladesh was collected on filter paper at three time points covering six years of follow-up per person. Analysis of anti-PGL-I Ab levels for 25 contacts who developed leprosy during follow-up and 199 contacts who were not diagnosed with leprosy, was performed by ELISA after elution of bloodspots from filter paper. RESULTS: Anti-PGL-I Ab levels at intake did not significantly differ between contacts who developed leprosy during the study and those who remained free of disease. Moreover, anti-PGL-I serology was not prognostic in this population as no significant correlation was identified between anti-PGL-I Ab levels at intake and the onset of leprosy. CONCLUSION: In this highly endemic population in Bangladesh, no association was observed between anti-PGL-I Ab levels and onset of disease, urging the need for an extended, more specific biomarker signature for early detection of leprosy in this area. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ISRCTN61223447.