Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Anaesthesiol ; 36(1): 8-15, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30113350

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The current opioid epidemic highlights the urgent need for effective adjuvant therapies to complement postoperative opioid analgesia. Intra-operative ketamine infusion has been shown to reduce postoperative opioid consumption and improve pain control in opioid-tolerant patients after spinal fusion surgery. Its efficacy for opioid-naïve patients, however, remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesised that low-dose ketamine infusion after major spinal surgery reduces opioid requirements in opioid-tolerant patients, but not in opioid-naïve patients. DESIGN: Randomised placebo-controlled study. SETTING: Single-centre, tertiary care hospital, November 2012 until November 2014. PATIENTS: A total of 129 patients were classified as either opioid-tolerant (daily use of opioid medications during 2 weeks preceding the surgery) or opioid-naïve group, then randomised to receive either ketamine or placebo; there were thus four groups of patients. All patients received intravenous hydromorphone patient-controlled analgesia postoperatively. INTERVENTION: Patients in the ketamine groups received a ketamine infusion (bolus 0.2 mg kg over 30 min followed by 0.12 mg kg h for 24 h). Patients in the placebo groups received 0.9% saline. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was opioid consumption during the first 24 h postoperatively. The secondary outcome was numerical pain scores during the first 24 h and central nervous system side effects. RESULTS: Postoperative hydromorphone consumption was significantly reduced in the opioid-tolerant ketamine group, compared with the opioid-tolerant placebo group [0.007 (95% CI 0.006 to 0.008) versus 0.011 (95% CI 0.010 to 0.011) mg kg h, Bonferroni corrected P < 0.001]. There was no difference in hydromorphone use between the opioid-naïve groups (0.004 and 0.005 mg kg h in the opioid-naïve ketamine and placebo group, respectively, P = 0.118). Pain scores did not differ significantly between the opioid-tolerant ketamine group and the opioid-naïve groups. There was no significant difference in side effects among groups. CONCLUSION: Postoperative low-dose ketamine infusion reduces opioid requirements for the first 24 h following spinal fusion surgery in opioid-tolerant, but not in opioid-naïve patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03274453 with clinicaltrials.gov.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Anesthetics, Dissociative/administration & dosage , Hydromorphone/therapeutic use , Ketamine/administration & dosage , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Analgesia, Patient-Controlled/methods , Analgesia, Patient-Controlled/statistics & numerical data , Analgesics, Opioid/pharmacology , Double-Blind Method , Drug Resistance , Female , Humans , Hydromorphone/pharmacology , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Pain, Postoperative/diagnosis , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Placebos/administration & dosage , Postoperative Care/methods , Prospective Studies , Spinal Diseases/surgery
2.
J Clin Anesth ; 33: 243-9, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27555173

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether lavender fleur oil (LFO) aromatherapy would reduce anxiety when administered to women before undergoing breast surgery. DESIGN: This was a single-site, randomized study comparing the effect of LFO to unscented oil (UO). SETTING: The study was conducted in the preoperative holding area of the ambulatory surgery department of NYU Langone Medical Center. PATIENTS: Ninety three women, 18 years and older, scheduled for breast surgery. Women meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria were randomized to either LFO or UO aromatherapy and were blind to their assigned treatment. OUTCOME MEASURES: Subjects completed a Speilberger State Anxiety Inventory for Adults (STAI) before and after aromatherapy. Vital signs were recorded before and after aromatherapy. RESULTS: STAI-State questions were divided into positive and negative emotions for analysis. Before aromatherapy, there was no significant difference between groups by individual questions or overall average answer of either positive or negative questions. The use of both LFO and UO increased the positive STAI score totals, with the LFO group having a slightly, but statistically significant, greater increase. Both resulted in a statistically significant decrease in the negative score totals after treatment. There were no differences in vital signs between groups for either treatment. Following the conclusion of the trial LFO was analyzed and found to contain a very low content of the 2 major Lavandula angustifolia constituents. CONCLUSIONS: Both LFO and UO aromatherapy treatments lowered anxiety before surgery despite no significant changes in vital signs. LFO treatment generated a slight but statistically significant increase in positive feelings compared with UO treatment. It is probable that the beneficial effect observed was due to both aromatherapy with LFO and a placebo effect related to the added attention given to the patients.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/prevention & control , Aromatherapy/methods , Breast/surgery , Oils, Volatile/therapeutic use , Plant Oils/therapeutic use , Preoperative Care/methods , Adult , Aged , Anxiety/psychology , Female , Humans , Lavandula/chemistry , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...